Hillary leads polls by 27 points!

[Siete]

Clinton is still clearly a stronger candidate than anyone else the Democrats might put forward at this point. Clinton leads Scott Walker, who currently leads in our national GOP polling, 46/42. By comparison Joe Biden (46/40) and Elizabeth Warren (43/39) would both trail Walker in hypothetical match ups.

In addition to Walker, 2 other GOP hopefuls come within 4 points of Clinton. Marco Rubio trails her just 46/43, and Rand Paul's deficit is 46/42. Paul's numbers are interesting. He actually does better than anyone else on his side with independents, leading Clinton by 14 points at 47/33. But the 77% of the Republican vote he gets against Clinton is the lowest of any candidate other than Chris Christie, suggesting that some GOP voters have so much concern about him that they might not even vote for him in a general election. Overall 30% of voters see Paul favorably to 47% who have a negative opinion.

Clinton leads Ben Carson 47/42. Ted Cruz caught fire with conservatives in his party after his candidacy announcement two weeks ago and moved into the upper echelon of Republican candidates within the primary electorate, but there are still a lot of more moderate voters in his party who have deep concerns about him. The 15% of Republicans he loses to Clinton is the most of any of the party's contenders, and it puts him down 49/43. Also down by 6 points is Jeb Bush at 46/40.
The Republicans faring the worst are Mike Huckabee who trails Clinton by 7 at 48/41, Rick Perry who trails Clinton by 9 at 48/39, and Chris Christie who trails Clinton by 9 at 46/37. Only 69% of Republicans even say they would vote for Christie in the general, by far the lowest of any of the party's possible candidates.

When it comes to the Democratic primary, Clinton's position is unchanged from February- she was at 54% then and she's at 54% now. Elizabeth Warren at 14%, Joe Biden at 7%, Bernie Sanders at 6%, Martin O'Malley at 3%, and Jim Webb at 2% round out the field.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Same ole silly shit.

Hillary is toast. Americans are sick and tired of Clinton shit. SHe is sleazy, old, and out of ideas. It is questionable whether she will win the primary. It is without doubt she will lose the general election.

Preserved for posterity!!!

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Hillary is immunized from all that because of the two decades of hysteria against her

 

[The Rabbi]

Clinton is still clearly a stronger candidate than anyone else the Democrats might put forward at this point. Clinton leads Scott Walker, who currently leads in our national GOP polling, 46/42. By comparison Joe Biden (46/40) and Elizabeth Warren (43/39) would both trail Walker in hypothetical match ups.

In addition to Walker, 2 other GOP hopefuls come within 4 points of Clinton. Marco Rubio trails her just 46/43, and Rand Paul's deficit is 46/42. Paul's numbers are interesting. He actually does better than anyone else on his side with independents, leading Clinton by 14 points at 47/33. But the 77% of the Republican vote he gets against Clinton is the lowest of any candidate other than Chris Christie, suggesting that some GOP voters have so much concern about him that they might not even vote for him in a general election. Overall 30% of voters see Paul favorably to 47% who have a negative opinion.

Clinton leads Ben Carson 47/42. Ted Cruz caught fire with conservatives in his party after his candidacy announcement two weeks ago and moved into the upper echelon of Republican candidates within the primary electorate, but there are still a lot of more moderate voters in his party who have deep concerns about him. The 15% of Republicans he loses to Clinton is the most of any of the party's contenders, and it puts him down 49/43. Also down by 6 points is Jeb Bush at 46/40.
The Republicans faring the worst are Mike Huckabee who trails Clinton by 7 at 48/41, Rick Perry who trails Clinton by 9 at 48/39, and Chris Christie who trails Clinton by 9 at 46/37. Only 69% of Republicans even say they would vote for Christie in the general, by far the lowest of any of the party's possible candidates.

When it comes to the Democratic primary, Clinton's position is unchanged from February- she was at 54% then and she's at 54% now. Elizabeth Warren at 14%, Joe Biden at 7%, Bernie Sanders at 6%, Martin O'Malley at 3%, and Jim Webb at 2% round out the field.

Hillary was ahead by 27 points over Obama and Edwards. How'd that work out?
That she is barely ahead of Marco Rubio, whom no one knows, should point to serious trouble. Clinton's advantage at this point is everyone knows who she is. Clinton's problem at this point is everyone knows what she is.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Clinton is still clearly a stronger candidate than anyone else the Democrats might put forward at this point. Clinton leads Scott Walker, who currently leads in our national GOP polling, 46/42. By comparison Joe Biden (46/40) and Elizabeth Warren (43/39) would both trail Walker in hypothetical match ups.

In addition to Walker, 2 other GOP hopefuls come within 4 points of Clinton. Marco Rubio trails her just 46/43, and Rand Paul's deficit is 46/42. Paul's numbers are interesting. He actually does better than anyone else on his side with independents, leading Clinton by 14 points at 47/33. But the 77% of the Republican vote he gets against Clinton is the lowest of any candidate other than Chris Christie, suggesting that some GOP voters have so much concern about him that they might not even vote for him in a general election. Overall 30% of voters see Paul favorably to 47% who have a negative opinion.

Clinton leads Ben Carson 47/42. Ted Cruz caught fire with conservatives in his party after his candidacy announcement two weeks ago and moved into the upper echelon of Republican candidates within the primary electorate, but there are still a lot of more moderate voters in his party who have deep concerns about him. The 15% of Republicans he loses to Clinton is the most of any of the party's contenders, and it puts him down 49/43. Also down by 6 points is Jeb Bush at 46/40.
The Republicans faring the worst are Mike Huckabee who trails Clinton by 7 at 48/41, Rick Perry who trails Clinton by 9 at 48/39, and Chris Christie who trails Clinton by 9 at 46/37. Only 69% of Republicans even say they would vote for Christie in the general, by far the lowest of any of the party's possible candidates.

When it comes to the Democratic primary, Clinton's position is unchanged from February- she was at 54% then and she's at 54% now. Elizabeth Warren at 14%, Joe Biden at 7%, Bernie Sanders at 6%, Martin O'Malley at 3%, and Jim Webb at 2% round out the field.

You are referring to today's Quinnipiac, right?

 

[Statistikhengst]

Clinton is still clearly a stronger candidate than anyone else the Democrats might put forward at this point. Clinton leads Scott Walker, who currently leads in our national GOP polling, 46/42. By comparison Joe Biden (46/40) and Elizabeth Warren (43/39) would both trail Walker in hypothetical match ups.

In addition to Walker, 2 other GOP hopefuls come within 4 points of Clinton. Marco Rubio trails her just 46/43, and Rand Paul's deficit is 46/42. Paul's numbers are interesting. He actually does better than anyone else on his side with independents, leading Clinton by 14 points at 47/33. But the 77% of the Republican vote he gets against Clinton is the lowest of any candidate other than Chris Christie, suggesting that some GOP voters have so much concern about him that they might not even vote for him in a general election. Overall 30% of voters see Paul favorably to 47% who have a negative opinion.

Clinton leads Ben Carson 47/42. Ted Cruz caught fire with conservatives in his party after his candidacy announcement two weeks ago and moved into the upper echelon of Republican candidates within the primary electorate, but there are still a lot of more moderate voters in his party who have deep concerns about him. The 15% of Republicans he loses to Clinton is the most of any of the party's contenders, and it puts him down 49/43. Also down by 6 points is Jeb Bush at 46/40.
The Republicans faring the worst are Mike Huckabee who trails Clinton by 7 at 48/41, Rick Perry who trails Clinton by 9 at 48/39, and Chris Christie who trails Clinton by 9 at 46/37. Only 69% of Republicans even say they would vote for Christie in the general, by far the lowest of any of the party's possible candidates.

When it comes to the Democratic primary, Clinton's position is unchanged from February- she was at 54% then and she's at 54% now. Elizabeth Warren at 14%, Joe Biden at 7%, Bernie Sanders at 6%, Martin O'Malley at 3%, and Jim Webb at 2% round out the field.

Hillary was ahead by 27 points over Obama and Edwards. How'd that work out?
That she is barely ahead of Marco Rubio, whom no one knows, should point to serious trouble. Clinton's advantage at this point is everyone knows who she is. Clinton's problem at this point is everyone knows what she is.

I am gonna talk with you for a moment as if you are a sentient being with some intelligence in you.

In 2008, Obama and Edwards had already declared. Even before they declared, Clinton's numbers were not as high as they are now. If any Dems with any heft want in for 2016, they are going to need to get in like yesterday in order to build a 50 state organization.

Furthermore, Rubio is enjoying a jump from his announcement and the Quinnipiac values are the leanest ones out there. The Wapo, CNN AND Rasmussen margins are far larger than this. They are probably too wide and these margins from Qpiac are likely too lean. The truth at this moment likely is somewhere in between, as polling aggregates tend to be.

 

[Siete]

Clinton is still clearly a stronger candidate than anyone else the Democrats might put forward at this point. Clinton leads Scott Walker, who currently leads in our national GOP polling, 46/42. By comparison Joe Biden (46/40) and Elizabeth Warren (43/39) would both trail Walker in hypothetical match ups.

In addition to Walker, 2 other GOP hopefuls come within 4 points of Clinton. Marco Rubio trails her just 46/43, and Rand Paul's deficit is 46/42. Paul's numbers are interesting. He actually does better than anyone else on his side with independents, leading Clinton by 14 points at 47/33. But the 77% of the Republican vote he gets against Clinton is the lowest of any candidate other than Chris Christie, suggesting that some GOP voters have so much concern about him that they might not even vote for him in a general election. Overall 30% of voters see Paul favorably to 47% who have a negative opinion.

Clinton leads Ben Carson 47/42. Ted Cruz caught fire with conservatives in his party after his candidacy announcement two weeks ago and moved into the upper echelon of Republican candidates within the primary electorate, but there are still a lot of more moderate voters in his party who have deep concerns about him. The 15% of Republicans he loses to Clinton is the most of any of the party's contenders, and it puts him down 49/43. Also down by 6 points is Jeb Bush at 46/40.
The Republicans faring the worst are Mike Huckabee who trails Clinton by 7 at 48/41, Rick Perry who trails Clinton by 9 at 48/39, and Chris Christie who trails Clinton by 9 at 46/37. Only 69% of Republicans even say they would vote for Christie in the general, by far the lowest of any of the party's possible candidates.

When it comes to the Democratic primary, Clinton's position is unchanged from February- she was at 54% then and she's at 54% now. Elizabeth Warren at 14%, Joe Biden at 7%, Bernie Sanders at 6%, Martin O'Malley at 3%, and Jim Webb at 2% round out the field.

You are referring to today's Quinnipiac, right?

nope, April 7 .. too early for polls, and as polls go, any poll showing Clinton with a lead is not credible ... just ask a RW'r

Clinton leads GOP field nationally although down from February - Public Policy Polling

 

[Statistikhengst]

Clinton is still clearly a stronger candidate than anyone else the Democrats might put forward at this point. Clinton leads Scott Walker, who currently leads in our national GOP polling, 46/42. By comparison Joe Biden (46/40) and Elizabeth Warren (43/39) would both trail Walker in hypothetical match ups.

In addition to Walker, 2 other GOP hopefuls come within 4 points of Clinton. Marco Rubio trails her just 46/43, and Rand Paul's deficit is 46/42. Paul's numbers are interesting. He actually does better than anyone else on his side with independents, leading Clinton by 14 points at 47/33. But the 77% of the Republican vote he gets against Clinton is the lowest of any candidate other than Chris Christie, suggesting that some GOP voters have so much concern about him that they might not even vote for him in a general election. Overall 30% of voters see Paul favorably to 47% who have a negative opinion.

Clinton leads Ben Carson 47/42. Ted Cruz caught fire with conservatives in his party after his candidacy announcement two weeks ago and moved into the upper echelon of Republican candidates within the primary electorate, but there are still a lot of more moderate voters in his party who have deep concerns about him. The 15% of Republicans he loses to Clinton is the most of any of the party's contenders, and it puts him down 49/43. Also down by 6 points is Jeb Bush at 46/40.
The Republicans faring the worst are Mike Huckabee who trails Clinton by 7 at 48/41, Rick Perry who trails Clinton by 9 at 48/39, and Chris Christie who trails Clinton by 9 at 46/37. Only 69% of Republicans even say they would vote for Christie in the general, by far the lowest of any of the party's possible candidates.

When it comes to the Democratic primary, Clinton's position is unchanged from February- she was at 54% then and she's at 54% now. Elizabeth Warren at 14%, Joe Biden at 7%, Bernie Sanders at 6%, Martin O'Malley at 3%, and Jim Webb at 2% round out the field.

You are referring to today's Quinnipiac, right?

nope, April 7 .. too early for polls, and as polls go, any poll showing Clinton with a lead is not credible ... just ask a RW'r

Clinton leads GOP field nationally although down from February - Public Policy Polling

Well, that's the point I wanted to make. The PPP (D) and the Qpiac values are close to each other, because they both use a more restrictive model. The Wapo, CNN polls use less restrictive models.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Translation: Soros and Al Aweed got their candidate the nomination in 2008 and it will be no different in 2016

uh, no, not really.

But I don't think if i explain it to you again you'd understand.

Simply put. Obama won because he was where the majority of his party and the country was at in 2008.

Period.

Obama was the guy who took the stand the Iraq War was a terrible idea in 2003, when that wasn't a popular position.

By 2008, everyone knew it was a bad idea, and he looked visionary for saying it first.

Obama won because he's owned by Soros and Al Aweed

Obama won because he was black

 

[Jarhead]

Obama won because he was black, that's all.

That must have left a mark on you. Here your party ran the best white guys money could buy and you all still got your asses kicked by the black guy.

That has really left a mark. Beaten by the black guy.

And now you are gonna be beaten by a woman.

I don't know if you all can recover from that.

Interesting.

So you think a white man should be ashamed for losing to a black man or a woman?

Funny....I never really though that was something to be ashamed of.

But obviously you do.

Kind of transparent.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Translation: Soros and Al Aweed got their candidate the nomination in 2008 and it will be no different in 2016

uh, no, not really.

But I don't think if i explain it to you again you'd understand.

Simply put. Obama won because he was where the majority of his party and the country was at in 2008.

Period.

Obama was the guy who took the stand the Iraq War was a terrible idea in 2003, when that wasn't a popular position.

By 2008, everyone knew it was a bad idea, and he looked visionary for saying it first.

Obama won because he's owned by Soros and Al Aweed

Obama won because he was black

Yes, we've heard this bellyaching before...

 

[warf]

Clinton Sustains Huge Lead in Democratic Nomination Race

It sure looks like she has a lock on the nomination.

It's a year and a half until the election.

Does anyone think these early polls mean anything?

 

[Redfish]

Clinton Sustains Huge Lead in Democratic Nomination Race

It sure looks like she has a lock on the nomination.

It's a year and a half until the election.

Does anyone think these early polls mean anything?

only the idiots who can't see who and what HRC really is.

so a majority of the 1200 polled think HRC will win??????????????? Big fricken deal. 700 out of 330,000,000. It means absolutely nothing, it is nothing but political cat shit.

Do any of you libs, or cons who buy into polling bullshit, have any knowledge of basic math, not to mention statistics? Do you understand what a representative sample is? Do you understand how foolish it is to try to extrapolate a sample of 1200 to a population of 330,000,000?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Clinton Sustains Huge Lead in Democratic Nomination Race

It sure looks like she has a lock on the nomination.

Poll from 2007. Not relevant to 2015/2016. You do understand the difference between the years 2007 and 2015, right?

Also from Gallup, a pollster that disgraced itself both in 2010 and 2012 and had to pay a multi-million dollar settlement out of court for having cooked the books.

This time, Hillary towers over the field of potential Democratic contenders by about 50 points, pretty similar to George H. W. Bush in the Republican primaries of 1988.

Any more stupid you want to pile on today?

Uhm, that was his point.... she was a shoe in as POTUS in 2008. Any more clueless you want to pile on today?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

And even better, the lady who is now the most infinitely qualified, was thrown under the bus for "Hope 'n Change" and "Yes We Can".

You just can't make this shit up... everyone should go home and watch "Idiocracy" this evening... this is where we are headed at this rate.

 

[The Rabbi]

Clinton Sustains Huge Lead in Democratic Nomination Race

It sure looks like she has a lock on the nomination.

Poll from 2007. Not relevant to 2015/2016. You do understand the difference between the years 2007 and 2015, right?

Also from Gallup, a pollster that disgraced itself both in 2010 and 2012 and had to pay a multi-million dollar settlement out of court for having cooked the books.

This time, Hillary towers over the field of potential Democratic contenders by about 50 points, pretty similar to George H. W. Bush in the Republican primaries of 1988.

Any more stupid you want to pile on today?

Uhm, that was his point.... she was a shoe in as POTUS in 2008. Any more clueless you want to pile on today?

Statistheilhitler likes to cherry pick polls that agree with what he says and dismiss contrary evidence.
The truth is polls this early are not indicative. Lots can happen. Howrard Dean's campaign looked on track with a huge war chest. And fell apart after his famous scream within 2 weeks.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Clinton Sustains Huge Lead in Democratic Nomination Race

It sure looks like she has a lock on the nomination.

Poll from 2007. Not relevant to 2015/2016. You do understand the difference between the years 2007 and 2015, right?

Also from Gallup, a pollster that disgraced itself both in 2010 and 2012 and had to pay a multi-million dollar settlement out of court for having cooked the books.

This time, Hillary towers over the field of potential Democratic contenders by about 50 points, pretty similar to George H. W. Bush in the Republican primaries of 1988.

Any more stupid you want to pile on today?

Uhm, that was his point.... she was a shoe in as POTUS in 2008. Any more clueless you want to pile on today?

Statistheilhitler likes to cherry pick polls that agree with what he says and dismiss contrary evidence.
The truth is polls this early are not indicative. Lots can happen. Howrard Dean's campaign looked on track with a huge war chest. And fell apart after his famous scream within 2 weeks.

Don't you have a nazi to go defend somewhere, you stinky liar?

I cherry pick no polls at all. I log ALL of them.

Must suck to be you, fake Rabbi.

Now, go suck an egg.

 

[Jroc]

Clinton is still clearly a stronger candidate than anyone else the Democrats might put forward at this point. Clinton leads Scott Walker, who currently leads in our national GOP polling, 46/42. By comparison Joe Biden (46/40) and Elizabeth Warren (43/39) would both trail Walker in hypothetical match ups.

In addition to Walker, 2 other GOP hopefuls come within 4 points of Clinton. Marco Rubio trails her just 46/43, and Rand Paul's deficit is 46/42. Paul's numbers are interesting. He actually does better than anyone else on his side with independents, leading Clinton by 14 points at 47/33. But the 77% of the Republican vote he gets against Clinton is the lowest of any candidate other than Chris Christie, suggesting that some GOP voters have so much concern about him that they might not even vote for him in a general election. Overall 30% of voters see Paul favorably to 47% who have a negative opinion.

Clinton leads Ben Carson 47/42. Ted Cruz caught fire with conservatives in his party after his candidacy announcement two weeks ago and moved into the upper echelon of Republican candidates within the primary electorate, but there are still a lot of more moderate voters in his party who have deep concerns about him. The 15% of Republicans he loses to Clinton is the most of any of the party's contenders, and it puts him down 49/43. Also down by 6 points is Jeb Bush at 46/40.
The Republicans faring the worst are Mike Huckabee who trails Clinton by 7 at 48/41, Rick Perry who trails Clinton by 9 at 48/39, and Chris Christie who trails Clinton by 9 at 46/37. Only 69% of Republicans even say they would vote for Christie in the general, by far the lowest of any of the party's possible candidates.

When it comes to the Democratic primary, Clinton's position is unchanged from February- she was at 54% then and she's at 54% now. Elizabeth Warren at 14%, Joe Biden at 7%, Bernie Sanders at 6%, Martin O'Malley at 3%, and Jim Webb at 2% round out the field.

You are referring to today's Quinnipiac, right?

You're watching the "Hillary for president" campaign fall apart before your eyes....It must be hard for you

 

[AudeSapere]

Ahhhh the Presidential elections, the illusion of choice. Will it be the plutocracys' puppet A from the Pandercrats or will it be the plutocracys' puppet B from the Repandercans? The Globalists-Internationalists agenda for America marches forward.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Ahhhh the Presidential elections, the illusion of choice. Will it be the plutocracys' puppet A from the Pandercrats or will it be the plutocracys' puppet B from the Repandercans? The Globalists' agenda for America marches forward.

ZOG!! ZOG!! ZOG!!

Black Helicopters!! Black Helicopters!!