Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's not clear to me what it was that you think didn't happen since my comment included numerous things that the prosecution intends to prove actually happened.how is it vague??
you made a comment and I said thank god that didnt happen,,,
sounds like youre just a fucking troll that has his thumb up his ass
beings I didnt list any specifics what do you think I meant??It's not clear to me what it was that you think didn't happen since my comment included numerous things that the prosecution intends to prove actually happened.
And you ignored the rest of my post, which sure seems like you are just here to attack me and troll without providing any actual rebuttal.
My best guess is that you meant that she wasn't paid off because it wasn't intended to protect his campaign.beings I didnt list any specifics what do you think I meant??
Why don't you ask Dotard Trump & his AG Bill Barr who failed to pursue your accusation, CLOWN?So why isn't' she on trial just like Trump? It's the same scenario, and all she and the DNC got were fines.
Definitely a two tiered justice system.
FEC fines Clinton and DNC for misreporting Steele dossier funding
Both were fined for misreporting the dossier funding as legal services instead of opposition research, according to the FEC.www.axios.com
the real problem is you dont have a problem with a candidate paying a former russian spy to make shit up and write it in a report so they can use it against their opponent to influence an elections,,,My best guess is that you meant that she wasn't paid off because it wasn't intended to protect his campaign.
But why should I have to guess about what you meant? If I just assumed things, you guys would jump down my throat for making too many assumptions.
Again, you ignore the content of my responses and focus on little bitty personal shit.
The thread started with a childish rant of wanting to see Clinton prosecuted.
For what? No one knows. You just want it and you want it NOW!
Like it or not, it doesn't matter. That's not illegal. Not really sure how it affected the election anyway since it wasn't used against Trump.the real problem is you dont have a problem with a candidate paying a former russian spy to make shit up and write it in a report so they can use it against their opponent to influence an elections,,,
If he broke the law to do so, then we should indeed be talking about it.but sure lets talk about a guy that fucked a hooker and didnt want her talking about it when everyone already knew he did,,
and call it election interference,,,
Please tell me exactly how she "colluded with Russia".The country saw how she colluded with Russia to undermine Trump, and we made our choice accordingly.
it may not matter to you,, but it matters in the real world,,Like it or not, it doesn't matter. That's not illegal. Not really sure how it affected the election anyway since it wasn't used against Trump.
If he broke the law to do so, then we should indeed be talking about it.
Pecker testified that Cohen was acting as Trump’s personal attorney, and wasn’t working for the campaign.My best guess is that you meant that she wasn't paid off because it wasn't intended to protect his campaign.
But why should I have to guess about what you meant? If I just assumed things, you guys would jump down my throat for making too many assumptions.
Again, you ignore the content of my responses and focus on little bitty personal shit.
We are not vagueLike I said, you're very vague which prevents you from being disproven. Without saying anything specific, you can't be refuted.
That's how you hide.
The prosecution believes he did this to protect his campaign. It's very reasonable. We all know he didn't record it as a campaign expense.
Maybe you don't believe it was done to protect the campaign, but you haven't seen all the evidence so your opinion isn't very helpful.
Please tell me exactly how she "colluded with Russia".
Why does it matter to the "real world"? The real world didn't even hear about the dossier until well after the election. Clinton may have paid for it, but unless she actually used it, not really sure what your beef is.it may not matter to you,, but it matters in the real world,,
even if he did what you claim,, thats a misdemeanor and a small fine not a felony,,
Good thing that never happened.It's outlined in the OP, and it doesn't matter whether you like it or not. Hillary colluded with Barack Obama and a group of Russian intelligence assets led by Christopher Steele to try to undermine Trump in 2016.
3 times isnt enough,,We are not vague
You are dumb and need the same thing explained to you three times to get it
we actually have proof of that one,,Good thing that never happened.
You really don't. Durham was tasked with proving that case but he came up with nothing and had no successful prosecutions.we actually have proof of that one,,
the trump claims have no proof,, well other than proof it didnt happen,,
Good thing that never happened.
Compiled by Christopher Steele.It did, though.
Where do you think the dossier came from?
