Hillary Promises To End Freed Speech

[bodecea]

The VOR ,
the wingnuts are gathering every crazy-assed anti-left fantasy they can find so they'll have more reasons to start their little revolution on November 9th.

But they love them some oppression of Free Press and Religious Freedom (if it's Moooslims)

 

[NoNukes]

[

Sometimes it is fun to play kick the dummy.

Are you opposed to Brown V. BOE as well as CU V. FEC?

Given your clear hatred of civil rights, one would imagine so.

Another dummy making no sense.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"... in order to claim not only tax free status but also anonymity for their donors."


Are you corrupt enough to pretend that revealing who the donors are is not a tactic designed to prevent the donors from expressing their right to free speech?
.

Free speech? Paid for political activism should not be able to hide. Donations to a charitable fund that doesn't involve itself in politics can be hidden.

"Paid for political activism should not be able to hide. Donations to a charitable fund that doesn't involve itself in politics can be hidden."

Why?

How is it your business, or any interest to any but Fascists, what my religion is, or how I vote???


Can you read English?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Does it say 'except for charities, religious folks, or political reasons'??????



So.....how does that new brown shirt fit, you Fascist?

PAC's are not people, and neither are corporations. Money does not equal free speech.

"PAC's are not people, and neither are corporations. Money does not equal free speech."


1. How about unions, you dope?

a. " The brothers that liberals like to hate are often trotted out as prime examples of why campaign finance reform is necessary. They are often portrayed as one of the biggest contributors to political candidates, their evil money financing evil Republicans...... OpenSecrets.org tallied the top donors in federal elections between 1989 and 2014. Koch Industries ;;;; doesn't appear until the 59th slot,...

b. Six of the top 10 are ... wait for it ... unions. They gave more than $278 million, with most of it going to Democrats. These are familiar names: AFSCME ($60.6 million), NEA ($53.5 million), IBEW ($44.4 million), UAW ($41.6 million), Carpenters & Joiners ($39.2 million) and SEIU ($38.3 million).

So, if money is the measure of evil in American politics and the Evil Koch Bros only come in 59th, who is really the most evil donor ever?

Turns out it's Act Blue, with just short of $100 million in contributions during its lifetime, which only started in 2004, 15 years after the Evil Koch Bros in the OpenSecrets.org compilation." Blog: 'Evil' Koch brothers just 59th on top political donation list




2. Money does equal free speech....so saith the Supreme Court.



3. Didn't we agree that you are a Fascist?

Unions are not people either. They should have to disclose where the money goes as well.

The Supreme Court once ruled that Black People were property too, no different than a mule.

"... in order to claim not only tax free status but also anonymity for their donors."


Are you corrupt enough to pretend that revealing who the donors are is not a tactic designed to prevent the donors from expressing their right to free speech?
.

Free speech? Paid for political activism should not be able to hide. Donations to a charitable fund that doesn't involve itself in politics can be hidden.

"Paid for political activism should not be able to hide. Donations to a charitable fund that doesn't involve itself in politics can be hidden."

Why?

How is it your business, or any interest to any but Fascists, what my religion is, or how I vote???


Can you read English?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Does it say 'except for charities, religious folks, or political reasons'??????



So.....how does that new brown shirt fit, you Fascist?

PAC's are not people, and neither are corporations. Money does not equal free speech.

"PAC's are not people, and neither are corporations. Money does not equal free speech."


1. How about unions, you dope?

a. " The brothers that liberals like to hate are often trotted out as prime examples of why campaign finance reform is necessary. They are often portrayed as one of the biggest contributors to political candidates, their evil money financing evil Republicans...... OpenSecrets.org tallied the top donors in federal elections between 1989 and 2014. Koch Industries ;;;; doesn't appear until the 59th slot,...

b. Six of the top 10 are ... wait for it ... unions. They gave more than $278 million, with most of it going to Democrats. These are familiar names: AFSCME ($60.6 million), NEA ($53.5 million), IBEW ($44.4 million), UAW ($41.6 million), Carpenters & Joiners ($39.2 million) and SEIU ($38.3 million).

So, if money is the measure of evil in American politics and the Evil Koch Bros only come in 59th, who is really the most evil donor ever?

Turns out it's Act Blue, with just short of $100 million in contributions during its lifetime, which only started in 2004, 15 years after the Evil Koch Bros in the OpenSecrets.org compilation." Blog: 'Evil' Koch brothers just 59th on top political donation list




2. Money does equal free speech....so saith the Supreme Court.



3. Didn't we agree that you are a Fascist?

Unions are not people either. They should have to disclose where the money goes as well.

The Supreme Court once ruled that Black People were property too, no different than a mule.

Why?


Didn't you see this?
In the 2007-08 election cycle, spending in all campaigns, from city council members up to the presidency, was $8.6 billion, about what Americans spend annually on potato chips.


Enough reason to end the first amendment?


You're pretty good at clicking those heels on your jackboots.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The VOR ,
the wingnuts are gathering every crazy-assed anti-left fantasy they can find so they'll have more reasons to start their little revolution on November 9th.

But they love them some oppression of Free Press and Religious Freedom (if it's Moooslims)

"But they love them some oppression of Free Press and Religious Freedom (if it's Moooslims)"


Link?

Or are you simply lying?



Do Liberals get some sort of special dispensation to absolve them of the lies???

 

[Uncensored2008]

Oh god you guys are so lame

So you deny this?

{
“CLINTON SUGGESTS WALL STREET INSIDERS ARE WHAT IS NEEDED TO FIX WALL STREET,” which she offered at the same Goldman symposium:
There’s nothing magic about regulations, too much is bad, too little is bad. How do you get to the golden key, how do we figure out what works? And the people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.


Clinton isn't outright saying she would populate the Treasury Department with Goldman and J.P. Morgan alums (though in a separate excerpt, she does suggest politicians have made it too hard for people who have been successful in business to serve in government). But she clearly is saying she's open to their input on how their companies should be regulated.

Then there are the bits that sound OK in context but cringe-worthy in isolation. Take this bit from an event in San Diego:

When I was a Senator from New York, I represented and worked with so many talented principled people who made their living in finance. But even thought I represented them and did all I could to make sure they continued to prosper, I called for closing the carried interest loophole and addressing skyrocketing CEO pay. I also was calling in ‘06, ‘07 for doing something about the mortgage crisis, because I saw every day from Wall Street literally to main streets across New York how a well-functioning financial system is essential. So when I raised early warnings about early warnings about subprime mortgages and called for regulating derivatives and over complex financial products, I didn’t get some big arguments, because people sort of said, no, that makes sense. But boy, have we had fights about it ever since.}

Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street Speeches Have Leaked. No Wonder She Didn’t Want Them to Get Out.

It's from the Communist publication Slate - are they lying?

 

[PoliticalChic]

[

Sometimes it is fun to play kick the dummy.

Are you opposed to Brown V. BOE as well as CU V. FEC?

Given your clear hatred of civil rights, one would imagine so.

Another dummy making no sense.

How many times a day do I have to eviscerate (better look that up) you???

Give me the number early, so we can get the slaughter over with.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm not picking sides here asshole. Neither unions nor corporations should be allowed to pour money into elections to influence/buy them.

Bullshit. Under McCain-Feingold, the law passed by Congress that severely restricted the freedom of speech, Unions were free to engage in electioneering through union rallies and news letter, and to extort union dues to financially promote the democratic party.

McCain-Feingold existed to silence the opposition, period.

You are picking the side of ending the 1st Amendment to promote the democratic party.

 

[Uncensored2008]

They have been trained like the intellectual seals that they are to flap their flippers in agreement to whatever their controllers tell them to...


She sez, while dutifully regurgitating what Mr. Prager has been paid to tell her.

Do you support repealing the Bill of Rights, perhaps by an executive order from Obama or Hillary, and replacing it with a Bill of Duties and Privileges, that defines each persons role in respect to serving the party?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm not picking sides here asshole. Neither unions nor corporations should be allowed to pour money into elections to influence/buy them.

Bullshit. Under McCain-Feingold, the law passed by Congress that severely restricted the freedom of speech, Unions were free to engage in electioneering through union rallies and news letter, and to extort union dues to financially promote the democratic party.

McCain-Feingold existed to silence the opposition, period.

You are picking the side of ending the 1st Amendment to promote the democratic party.

1. Soros money supported and catalyzed theMcCain-Feingold Act, which banned ‘soft money,’ stripping the two major parties of their financial base. This allowed Soros to create a “Shadow Party,” designed to funnel massive amounts of capital into organizations that would assume the role that the political parties traditionally played.

a. A 527 group is a private, tax-exempt political organization set up under Section 527 of the U.S. tax code. Such groups have been around for years but never took center stage until 2004, when they became major players. That's because McCain-Feingold shut the door on unlimited contributions (so-called "soft money") to political parties, so that many of the big-dollar donations began flowing to 527 groups instead. McCain-Feingold at Rest

 

[PoliticalChic]

They have been trained like the intellectual seals that they are to flap their flippers in agreement to whatever their controllers tell them to...


She sez, while dutifully regurgitating what Mr. Prager has been paid to tell her.

Do you support repealing the Bill of Rights, perhaps by an executive order from Obama or Hillary, and replacing it with a Bill of Duties and Privileges, that defines each persons role in respect to serving the party?

Already done.


Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????


" Donald Trump: As President, I’ll Reverse the Law That Prevents Churches from Endorsing Candidates
Trump said near the end of his speech that he would rescind the IRS rule preventing churches from endorsing candidates.

That takes you and it makes you less powerful than a man or woman walking up and down the street. You actually have less power.”

And yet if you look at it, I was talking to someone, we probably have 250 million, maybe even more, in terms of people, so we have more Christians… than we have men or women in our country and we don’t have a lobby because they’re afraid to have a lobby because they don’t want to lose their tax status.

So I am going to work like hell to get rid of that prohibition and we’re going to have the strongest Christian lobby and it’s going to happen. This took place during the presidency of Lyndon Johnson and it has had a terrible chilling effect."
Donald Trump: As President, I’ll Reverse the Law That Prevents Churches from Endorsing Candidates

 

[Uncensored2008]

The woman is a moron.

Son, she pisses out more IQ points every morning than you and NYC combined ever mustered...

 

[Uncensored2008]

The left controls areas where you need an education.

Like finance and engineering?

The left controls areas where hard facts don't matter.

 

[Uncensored2008]

But they love them some oppression of Free Press and Religious Freedom (if it's Moooslims)

Holy shit, the average IQ in this thread just dropped 60 points..

oh, Hi Bode...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Something about this thread seems to have set our Liberal pals off. What could it be? The truth, perhaps?


Let's review:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

"...no law..." No statute, no regulation, no requirement, nor command. Not any.




9. "People who say there is "too much money in politics" are necessarily saying three very sinister things.
First, they are saying that there is too much political speech; second, they are saying that they know just the right amount of political speech;
and third, they are saying that government should enforce the limits they want on the amount of political speech. That is, the government should regulate speech about the government.


....what they want -- to restrict free speech -- is incompatible with the Constitution.


So, for the first time in American history, reformers calling themselves Progressives are proposing to change the First Amendment in order to empower Congress to decide the quantity, content and timing of political speech.

And who would benefit from the speech-restricting rules Congress would write? Well, we know this: every campaign finance law that ever has existed, or ever will exist has been, or will be, written by incumbent legislators. That is, all laws regulating campaigns will favor the re-election of incumbents." Money in Politics: What's the Problem?




Can you see why the same ethos is found in all six: Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Socialism, Progressivism, and Nazism?

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Opposing, insensitive points of view shall not be tolerated.......facist little proggressive snowflakes....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Opposing, insensitive points of view shall not be tolerated.......facist little proggressive snowflakes....

Seems that they're working on that as an amendment....it will include 'trigger warnings' and 'safe spaces.'

 

[BlindBoo]

Something about this thread seems to have set our Liberal pals off. What could it be?

The lie that overturning CU would be the end of free speech.

imo.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Opposing, insensitive points of view shall not be tolerated.......facist little proggressive snowflakes....

Seems that they're working on that as an amendment....it will include 'trigger warnings' and 'safe spaces.'

Neutered, pathetic, little imbeciles..... One can only mock & marvel...... lol
,

 

[PoliticalChic]

Something about this thread seems to have set our Liberal pals off. What could it be?

The lie that overturning CU would be the end of free speech.

imo.

I never lie.

Proving your fascistic instincts was a bonus of sorts.

 

[BlindBoo]

Something about this thread seems to have set our Liberal pals off. What could it be?

The lie that overturning CU would be the end of free speech.

imo.

I never lie.

Proving your fascistic instincts was a bonus of sorts.

Your posts always contain a lie. Sometime subtle, sometimes not.