🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Hillary violates national security at last night's debate?

Can you imagine Hillary with the nuclear button? The woman throws lamps at her husband for Christ's sake.


And, according to the emails between Podesta and another aid, she can't remember what she says or does from one day to the next. They said she doesn't know what planet she's on.
 
You announce it to reduce civilian casualties. In his cartoonish version of the world, Mosul is a city that is 100% enemy. His world view is one of WWII where Germany was the enemy and the whole of Germany must be destroyed. Things have changed over the intervening 70+ years.


Riiiiight, because only civilians get the message. Those animals use women and children as human shields. I don't think innocent people there have the option of leaving or taking cover.
 
I have never heard before the strategically very sensitive information that it took 4 minutes to launch a NUCLEAR STRIKE after the Presidential decision to "Go" is made.

Hillary casually referenced this very strategically important information at last night's debate. Did she violate national security?


It was in a attempt to show how easily the emotionally unstable MALE drama queen you've nominated would be able to fire off a Nuke.

th
 
your right

isis is now fortified with billions of dollars

worth of American equipment that the admin left behind

it should never have been allowed to fester to this size

another big shout out to this admin

Actually, ISIL got all of their equipment that was supplied to the Iraqi soldiers so that they could defend themselves, when the Iraqis got scared, turned tail and ran, leaving their weapons and uniforms behind.

If you want to blame someone for arming ISIL, blame the Iraqi soldiers that abandoned their weapons and armor.

still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon
Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.
The development of ISIS in Iraq is down to Bush. The causal chain links it clearly to Bush. If we had never been there in the first place, none of it would have happened. If Bush had not invaded Iraq, if Bush had not set a date for us to withdraw (a date which Obama simply honored), ISIS would not have developed in Iraq.

It is all down to Bush...that is what the logic determins. Causal chain. Bush.

no it is not

ISIS did not exist under bush

this a monster that came about during the obama administration
Sorry Jon but you are completely wrong and Esme is completely Correct,just saying steve
 
You announce it to reduce civilian casualties. In his cartoonish version of the world, Mosul is a city that is 100% enemy. His world view is one of WWII where Germany was the enemy and the whole of Germany must be destroyed. Things have changed over the intervening 70+ years.


Riiiiight, because only civilians get the message. Those animals use women and children as human shields. I don't think innocent people there have the option of leaving or taking cover.

Your ignorance is deep and profound.
 
I love how Trump continually brings up how it is strategically inept to announce where you are going to attack,

Last night....Why do they announce they are going to attack Mosul? Why give them warning? We need to sneak attack

Mosul is a major fortified city. Does Trump think they don't know they will be attacked? Does he think an army can advance on a city and nobody would realize it?

Another moronic never served military "genius". You people are true idiots.
 
I love how Trump continually brings up how it is strategically inept to announce where you are going to attack,

Last night....Why do they announce they are going to attack Mosul? Why give them warning? We need to sneak attack

Mosul is a major fortified city. Does Trump think they don't know they will be attacked? Does he think an army can advance on a city and nobody would realize it?

Another moronic never served military "genius". You people are true idiots.

Deferment Don knows more than the Generals about ISIS…just ask him.
 
Actually, ISIL got all of their equipment that was supplied to the Iraqi soldiers so that they could defend themselves, when the Iraqis got scared, turned tail and ran, leaving their weapons and uniforms behind.

If you want to blame someone for arming ISIL, blame the Iraqi soldiers that abandoned their weapons and armor.

still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon
Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.
The development of ISIS in Iraq is down to Bush. The causal chain links it clearly to Bush. If we had never been there in the first place, none of it would have happened. If Bush had not invaded Iraq, if Bush had not set a date for us to withdraw (a date which Obama simply honored), ISIS would not have developed in Iraq.

It is all down to Bush...that is what the logic determins. Causal chain. Bush.

no it is not

ISIS did not exist under bush

this a monster that came about during the obama administration
Sorry Jon but you are completely wrong and Esme is completely Correct,just saying steve


cant have it both ways steve

either isis didnt exist prior to obama

or the administration knew going it that they were arming and supporting

isis in Libya

which is it
 
This isn't as big deal....the technology she sold to China during bill's first 2 terms in office did far more damage to American national security than that comment....and just imagine the secrets she sold to foreign governments for bribes funneled through the clinton foundation.......that too is far more damaging than that comment.......she didn't even get a bribe to make that statement...

Or did she.....? is it possible that she recieved money to get that information, and that is how she decided to reveal it?
 
Hillary Spills National Secrets in Debate

http://i0.wp.com/truepundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/hillary-nuclear.jpg?w=1020

And you want this woman to be president and have her finger on the nuke button?

But here’s the deal. The bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There’s about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so.” –Hillary Clinton, National TV Appearance

It's not that countries like Russia and China don't already know this. It's blabbing it out on national TV with the whole world watching.

More @ Pentagon: Hillary Clinton Should Be Arrested For Leaking Top Secret Nuclear Intelligence on National TV
jebus longknife! You are such a tool of misinformation it is astounding.... Why don't you EVER do any research on your own instead of being a Ditto head of the right wing propaganda machine? Why? What makes you this way? OR ANYONE this way...such an easy tool of propaganda....??? The lack of intellect? The lack of curiosity? Pure Laziness?

As usual, Attack! Attack! Don't bother to even try to make a lucid comment in refutation.
Longknife, I did not mean for my comments to come off as an attack on you or you alone or you and others...it's just so frustrating to see people NOT USE their God given brain and RESEARCH what these propagandist sites and sites you even trust and fact check what they have said....I saw this thread title and did a google and found two to three articles mentioning only having a handful of minutes from when notified to when the nuke button would be pulled to make a decision...

THIS IS PUBLIC INFORMATION.....

So why oh why oh why would you and others PUSH this CLEARLY FALSE information that Hillary broke some kind of National Security? WHY?

2 minutes to find out this GARBAGE being passed around by the right wing propaganda machine is simply NOT TRUE.

Why can't YOU and others, spend a few minutes to research the contention of these type of propaganda articles? WHY?

TWO MINUTES to find the TRUTH....2 minutes....
Well, I FAILED to do what you did and search to find out whether or not this was public information. I will be more careful in the future.
 
She doesn't know what she is doing.

Big stick foreign policy is meant for powers that can't stand up to you.

If you really think we could stomp them out in a conventional war in a nano-second you don't know shit about military history.

Our forces our deployed and weakened across the planet, their aren't.

1. They are prepared and realistic about the situation, we aren't.

2. They are ready for a real confrontation, we aren't.

3. They are serious about the situation, we aren't.

russian-bear-obama-merkel_telegraph.jpg



A no-fly zone for Aleppo risks a war that could engulf us all | Jonathan Steele


Oh ye, of so little faith.... don't fool yourself, we are MORE than prepared for a Conventional War against Russia, in fact about 10 times more prepared than Russia...


Oh yeah?

Link me to where civil preparedness drills have been run in the population, go on, take your time.


Went through that in the 60s

Duck and cover

It was a waste of time


That was back when MAD was the mutual policy of both nations.

Now, they have both gotten rid of many of their ICBM's, and both powers somehow have the delusion that they can fight a limited exchange.

Added to that, the elites have built D.U.M.B.'s for themselves and critical infrastructure.


We have reached the point where Russia could use nukes and we could use conventional and we would still win

That is how superior our military is


We're fighting in too many theatres, this is simply wrong. We are stretched too thin to fight, it would have to be done with Nukes.
 
So preppers, do you have a 4 minute bugout bag? Yeah, nobody does.
Actually, I noticed long ago that the really hard core preppers and folks that have connections to the elites left the forum over a year ago. I'm not even sure they are in an area that has good wireless connection to log on to the forum to tell the truth.


A lot of them aren't even in the US or Europe any longer.
 
Oh ye, of so little faith.... don't fool yourself, we are MORE than prepared for a Conventional War against Russia, in fact about 10 times more prepared than Russia...

Oh yeah?

Link me to where civil preparedness drills have been run in the population, go on, take your time.

Went through that in the 60s

Duck and cover

It was a waste of time

That was back when MAD was the mutual policy of both nations.

Now, they have both gotten rid of many of their ICBM's, and both powers somehow have the delusion that they can fight a limited exchange.

Added to that, the elites have built D.U.M.B.'s for themselves and critical infrastructure.

We have reached the point where Russia could use nukes and we could use conventional and we would still win

That is how superior our military is

We're fighting in too many theatres, this is simply wrong. We are stretched too thin to fight, it would have to be done with Nukes.
He's just trying to reassure the partisans and the drones that don't know shit. This is common knowledge.


The left and the neo-con NWO agenda 21 are playing with a shitty hand and they having nothing left but to bluff or kick over the game board. They have lost and need to reorganize the pieces. The losers are going to be the plebes in the west if we don't boot the internationalists out while there is still time.


. . . . if there is still time. It seems the hour has grown late. Much too late.



If rightwinger had anything, he would back his bullshit up with links. As it is, he doesn't.


What kind of idiot says a global power can beat a nuclear power with conventional forces only?

The only way that could be done is with classified break away civilization space weapons. If he is talking about that sort of stuff, he has just entered tin foil hat territory. :tinfoil: IN that case, we'll need some serious links.

maxresdefault.jpg
 
I love how Trump continually brings up how it is strategically inept to announce where you are going to attack,

Last night....Why do they announce they are going to attack Mosul? Why give them warning? We need to sneak attack

Mosul is a major fortified city. Does Trump think they don't know they will be attacked? Does he think an army can advance on a city and nobody would realize it?

your right

isis is now fortified with billions of dollars

worth of American equipment that the admin left behind

it should never have been allowed to fester to this size

another big shout out to this admin

Actually, ISIL got all of their equipment that was supplied to the Iraqi soldiers so that they could defend themselves, when the Iraqis got scared, turned tail and ran, leaving their weapons and uniforms behind.

If you want to blame someone for arming ISIL, blame the Iraqi soldiers that abandoned their weapons and armor.

still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon
Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.
So you never read the Wikileaks on how ISIS was created huh?

Typical.
RussiaLeaks/WikiLies is hardly a reliable source for anything. ISIS started under Bush, and no amount of Trump trumpery can change that fact.
 
your right

isis is now fortified with billions of dollars

worth of American equipment that the admin left behind

it should never have been allowed to fester to this size

another big shout out to this admin

Actually, ISIL got all of their equipment that was supplied to the Iraqi soldiers so that they could defend themselves, when the Iraqis got scared, turned tail and ran, leaving their weapons and uniforms behind.

If you want to blame someone for arming ISIL, blame the Iraqi soldiers that abandoned their weapons and armor.

still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon
Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.
So you never read the Wikileaks on how ISIS was created huh?

Typical.
RussiaLeaks/WikiLies is hardly a reliable source for anything. ISIS started under Bush, and no amount of Trump trumpery can change that fact.


Wrong.....isis started after obama pulled our troops out of Iraq....which he didn't have to do since the Afghan government was willing to renogotiate the Status of Forces Agreement.....obama didn't care, he just wanted out...now we have isis....
 
I love how Trump continually brings up how it is strategically inept to announce where you are going to attack,

Last night....Why do they announce they are going to attack Mosul? Why give them warning? We need to sneak attack

Mosul is a major fortified city. Does Trump think they don't know they will be attacked? Does he think an army can advance on a city and nobody would realize it?

your right

isis is now fortified with billions of dollars

worth of American equipment that the admin left behind

it should never have been allowed to fester to this size

another big shout out to this admin

Actually, ISIL got all of their equipment that was supplied to the Iraqi soldiers so that they could defend themselves, when the Iraqis got scared, turned tail and ran, leaving their weapons and uniforms behind.

If you want to blame someone for arming ISIL, blame the Iraqi soldiers that abandoned their weapons and armor.

still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon
Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.


trump didnt want the war in the first place
Pure trumpery.
Trump wanted the war until Bush was losing it and then in 2008 Trump wanted immediate and complete withdrawal. A withdrawal that he now claims creates a vacuum for ISIS.
 
Actually, ISIL got all of their equipment that was supplied to the Iraqi soldiers so that they could defend themselves, when the Iraqis got scared, turned tail and ran, leaving their weapons and uniforms behind.

If you want to blame someone for arming ISIL, blame the Iraqi soldiers that abandoned their weapons and armor.

still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon
Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.
So you never read the Wikileaks on how ISIS was created huh?

Typical.
RussiaLeaks/WikiLies is hardly a reliable source for anything. ISIS started under Bush, and no amount of Trump trumpery can change that fact.


Wrong.....isis started after obama pulled our troops out of Iraq....which he didn't have to do since the Afghan government was willing to renogotiate the Status of Forces Agreement.....obama didn't care, he just wanted out...now we have isis....
ISIS began in 2004, Obama had no control over our troops.
 
still the prezbos fault for leaving too soon
Trump wanted to leave 3 years earlier. Clearly Trump wanted ISIS to be created sooner rather than later.
So you never read the Wikileaks on how ISIS was created huh?

Typical.
RussiaLeaks/WikiLies is hardly a reliable source for anything. ISIS started under Bush, and no amount of Trump trumpery can change that fact.


Wrong.....isis started after obama pulled our troops out of Iraq....which he didn't have to do since the Afghan government was willing to renogotiate the Status of Forces Agreement.....obama didn't care, he just wanted out...now we have isis....
ISIS began in 2004, Obama had no control over our troops.


Wrong......obama pulled our troops and isis took over...
 
Wrong.....isis started after obama pulled our troops out of Iraq....which he didn't have to do since the Afghan government was willing to renogotiate the Status of Forces Agreement.....obama didn't care, he just wanted out...now we have isis....
The Afghan government has nothing to do with Iraq's government. :asshole:
 

Forum List

Back
Top