Hillary was swiftboated with unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, fake news, lies, FBI malfeasance

[francoHFW]

Did it really get that bad? I don't think so.

Weekly Unemployment Claims: Down 19K, Lowest Since 1973 - dshort - Advisor Perspectives

What is wrong with our economy is that in 30 years the rich people's pay has skyrocketed and the middle class has not gotten a raise. Why? I showed you in my previous post.

So when a CEO's pay goes from $3 million to $30 million and his 1000 employees don't get a raise in 30 years don't wonder why the middle class is struggling. And "you people" defend the CEO paying himself however much he wants to pay himself. And however little he wants to pay his employees regardless of how productive they are. Wake up Papa

Been awake, I see your party and the Republican in bed with the rich.

Democrats lost the working class vote this time. At least the Democrats pretended to care about the poor when Obama was elected, this time the working middle class saw through the Democrats. This lost them more in the House, they lost the Senate, the Presidency, the Governorships and the Supreme Court.

The facade that the Dems care about the working class is gone.

And the illusion that the GOP cares is out there.

It worked for Trump, he got the working class.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you agree in the last few decades all the raises have gone to upper management? So while profits and productivity are up, our wages are not keeping up. So why don't the corporations and CEO's just go back to paying us our fair share? This is why the middle class, especially blue collar, are hurting. Do you think the GOP or Trump are going to fix this?

And instead of giving workers wages, they give shareholders more. They used to take care of the workers first but since the 70's they've broke the social contract they used to have with workers. If you go to places like Germany you see the workers still have a social contract with the corporations that do business there. In America, since the 70's, corporations have said workers are worth less so we can give shareholders more. Do you think Trump is going to fix this problem?

These are the reasons why the middle class isn't doing as well as it should be. And you voted out the liberals and democrats expecting the Republicans to fix this?

HA.

Reid and Pelosi took over in 2005, Obama came in in 2008 and your precious Democrats did nothing. Nor did they do it in 1993 when the had the Presidency, the House and the Senate.

I think the idea the Dems would do anything is utter BS.

2007, 2009, actually. If you're party first a-holes like the new bs GOP, it's easy to obstruct unless the Dems have 60% of the Senate, like Obama had for 30 DAYS. Scott Brown was a catastrophe.

 

[hadit]

The plain truth is she lied, was caught, and lied again. She knowingly violated State Department protocol, why, we can only guess. Unlike Nixon, she erased the majority of emails, why, we can only guess. Face it, she beat herself, even with the AG, and FBI capitulation, she escaped prosecution, even after paid for political rally disturbances and protests she lost. The media adored and ordained her, yet to my surprise the American people rejected her. I for one have to give credit to the silent majority, they raised up and picked the better of the two. What is of concern are those blind sheep that drank too much koolaid, were unable to see the con, and played like fools.

The e-mails she deleted were personal, just like every other gov't official, dupe.

At least, that's what SHE says. Naturally, there was no independent oversight of the deletions.

And never has been....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Which is, of course, why she deliberately mixed the two together, to give her plausible reason to delete those she didn't, for whatever reason, want seen. It's a moot point anyway, because her carelessness with national security won't get near the White House without a visitor's pass.

There is no reason. Except in hater dupe world...

You're saying there is no good reason for her to delete emails. Interesting.

 

[francoHFW]

The e-mails she deleted were personal, just like every other gov't official, dupe.

At least, that's what SHE says. Naturally, there was no independent oversight of the deletions.

And never has been....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Which is, of course, why she deliberately mixed the two together, to give her plausible reason to delete those she didn't, for whatever reason, want seen. It's a moot point anyway, because her carelessness with national security won't get near the White House without a visitor's pass.

There is no reason. Except in hater dupe world...

You're saying there is no good reason for her to delete emails. Interesting.

No good reason not to. Personal. P-E-R-S-O-N-A-L. Duhhhh. IT'S not A CONSPIRACEE!!!!!

 

[hadit]

How is it different then Hillary billionaires taking over our country?

There are three dynamics that can explain the growing income gap between the rich and poor. 1. growing inequality in compensation, or skyrocketing pay for those at the top of the economy compared to everyone else; 2. a greater share of income going toward corporate profits and not wages; 3. and the increase in consumer prices that means wages don’t stretch as far. The first two basically indicate growing income inequality, and together they account for more than two-thirds of the divergence between productivity and pay between 1973 and 2014. And it’s getting worse with time: Between 2000 and 2014, these factors made up 87.2 percent of the gap.

And income inequality has resulted from deliberate government policy choices, “policy decisions made on behalf of those with the most income, wealth, and power that suppressed wage growth.” Research has consistently shown that the government is more responsive to the desires of the rich than everyone else. Things like: allowing unemployment to remain too high, failing to raise the minimum wage, letting overtime protections erode, and the corrosion of collective bargaining rights.

Yep, Wall St. owns Washington and party doesn't matter. You might be finally figuring it out.

So then we can agree this is no victory for the middle class?

It is a victory for the middle class in that their voice was heard.

Sure, dupe. Enjoy the tax cut for the rich and the double down on W shell games. Hillary wanted a tax hike on the bloated rich and investment in America and Americans. You got duped AGAIN by malevolent bs gossip and racist fear mongering...

Let me guess, you actually believed that she could tax enough to pay for massive new spending!!

 

[hadit]

At least, that's what SHE says. Naturally, there was no independent oversight of the deletions.

And never has been....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Which is, of course, why she deliberately mixed the two together, to give her plausible reason to delete those she didn't, for whatever reason, want seen. It's a moot point anyway, because her carelessness with national security won't get near the White House without a visitor's pass.

There is no reason. Except in hater dupe world...

You're saying there is no good reason for her to delete emails. Interesting.

No good reason not to. Personal. P-E-R-S-O-N-A-L. Duhhhh. IT'S not A CONSPIRACEE!!!!!

Naturally, you actually believe that. Because she said so, and stuff.

 

[francoHFW]

And never has been....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Which is, of course, why she deliberately mixed the two together, to give her plausible reason to delete those she didn't, for whatever reason, want seen. It's a moot point anyway, because her carelessness with national security won't get near the White House without a visitor's pass.

There is no reason. Except in hater dupe world...

You're saying there is no good reason for her to delete emails. Interesting.

No good reason not to. Personal. P-E-R-S-O-N-A-L. Duhhhh. IT'S not A CONSPIRACEE!!!!!

Naturally, you actually believe that. Because she said so, and stuff.

No, she had facts and studies. Unlike you, fear mongered bs propaganda dupe. Anything to save the bloated greedy GOP megarich from paying their fair share. Enjoy their giant tax cut.

 

[P@triot]

Remember fool, "I could shoot someone and not lose one vote" is a quote from the billionaire you worship. You think the middle class won? You just put a billionaire in charge and gave the GOP complete control. You're so fucked!

At least Trump made his wealth in the private sector. Unlike the Clinton's who got unimaginably wealthy as public servants by selling their power to the highest bidders.

And to think you want to put that in the White House. Shows your complete lack of integrity.

 

[P@triot]

Just wait and see all the secrecy and corruption and lies that come out of our new President's administration. And Trump will blow it all off and just blame the lyin liberal media.

That is hilarious coming from an Obama and Clinton worshipper...

 

[P@triot]

You know what? I just realized the people who did well under Bush were coal miners and oil company employees. They were doing well when gas was $4. Alaska was doing great at the expense of the rest of the country.

As opposed to Obama and the Clinton's who did really well at the expense of the rest of the country.

 

[Papageorgio]

There are three dynamics that can explain the growing income gap between the rich and poor. 1. growing inequality in compensation, or skyrocketing pay for those at the top of the economy compared to everyone else; 2. a greater share of income going toward corporate profits and not wages; 3. and the increase in consumer prices that means wages don’t stretch as far. The first two basically indicate growing income inequality, and together they account for more than two-thirds of the divergence between productivity and pay between 1973 and 2014. And it’s getting worse with time: Between 2000 and 2014, these factors made up 87.2 percent of the gap.

And income inequality has resulted from deliberate government policy choices, “policy decisions made on behalf of those with the most income, wealth, and power that suppressed wage growth.” Research has consistently shown that the government is more responsive to the desires of the rich than everyone else. Things like: allowing unemployment to remain too high, failing to raise the minimum wage, letting overtime protections erode, and the corrosion of collective bargaining rights.

Yep, Wall St. owns Washington and party doesn't matter. You might be finally figuring it out.

So then we can agree this is no victory for the middle class?

It is a victory for the middle class in that their voice was heard.

Sure, dupe. Enjoy the tax cut for the rich and the double down on W shell games. Hillary wanted a tax hike on the bloated rich and investment in America and Americans. You got duped AGAIN by malevolent bs gossip and racist fear mongering...

And he says "I didn't vote for Hillary or Trump". Fact is if he didn't vote Hillary and he's not rich, he got duped. And he doesn't even know it.

Papa sounds like all the dumb ass blacks who say they didn't vote because it doesn't matter. Papa voted for Jill or Gary? What a fucking joke. Like they were credible/real candidates. LOL. Jill must be an idiot too who didn't think there was a difference. Now lets see how GREEN this country becomes, Jill stein, stupidest cUmT of the fucking year.

Nope, McMullun. Love how you assholes make fun of people that don't follow your agenda. I knew he wouldn't win but at least I didn't vote for one of the two worst candidates in the history of our nation and you have the nerve to make fun of me, you are a big joke! You don't even pay your fair share of taxes and then you complain about others? LOL!

Hillary was going to increase the separation between rich and poor, why vote for her, she long ago forgot about the middle class and poor and even called them deplorables. She is the deplorable one.

 

[Papageorgio]

Been awake, I see your party and the Republican in bed with the rich.

Democrats lost the working class vote this time. At least the Democrats pretended to care about the poor when Obama was elected, this time the working middle class saw through the Democrats. This lost them more in the House, they lost the Senate, the Presidency, the Governorships and the Supreme Court.

The facade that the Dems care about the working class is gone.

And the illusion that the GOP cares is out there.

It worked for Trump, he got the working class.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you agree in the last few decades all the raises have gone to upper management? So while profits and productivity are up, our wages are not keeping up. So why don't the corporations and CEO's just go back to paying us our fair share? This is why the middle class, especially blue collar, are hurting. Do you think the GOP or Trump are going to fix this?

And instead of giving workers wages, they give shareholders more. They used to take care of the workers first but since the 70's they've broke the social contract they used to have with workers. If you go to places like Germany you see the workers still have a social contract with the corporations that do business there. In America, since the 70's, corporations have said workers are worth less so we can give shareholders more. Do you think Trump is going to fix this problem?

These are the reasons why the middle class isn't doing as well as it should be. And you voted out the liberals and democrats expecting the Republicans to fix this?

HA.

Reid and Pelosi took over in 2005, Obama came in in 2008 and your precious Democrats did nothing. Nor did they do it in 1993 when the had the Presidency, the House and the Senate.

I think the idea the Dems would do anything is utter BS.

2007, 2009, actually. If you're party first a-holes like the new bs GOP, it's easy to obstruct unless the Dems have 60% of the Senate, like Obama had for 30 DAYS. Scott Brown was a catastrophe.

If you really believe that then you know with certainty Trump will get nothing passed.

 

[P@triot]

And he says "I didn't vote for Hillary or Trump". Fact is if he didn't vote Hillary and he's not rich, he got duped. And he doesn't even know it.

Papa sounds like all the dumb ass blacks who say they didn't vote because it doesn't matter. Papa voted for Jill or Gary? What a fucking joke. Like they were credible/real candidates. LOL. Jill must be an idiot too who didn't think there was a difference. Now lets see how GREEN this country becomes, Jill stein, stupidest cUmT of the fucking year.

Watching all of you progressives have epic meltdowns is hilarious... You people are sitting around screaming that everyone is an a-hole. Trump. The American people. Any fellow progressive that didn't vote for Hitlery Clinton.

It's pretty clear that the entire nation was a lot smarter than you!

 

[sealybobo]

At least, that's what SHE says. Naturally, there was no independent oversight of the deletions.

And never has been....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Which is, of course, why she deliberately mixed the two together, to give her plausible reason to delete those she didn't, for whatever reason, want seen. It's a moot point anyway, because her carelessness with national security won't get near the White House without a visitor's pass.

There is no reason. Except in hater dupe world...

You're saying there is no good reason for her to delete emails. Interesting.

No good reason not to. Personal. P-E-R-S-O-N-A-L. Duhhhh. IT'S not A CONSPIRACEE!!!!!

I'd love to comb through all of hadit's emails. Do you think he would delete the ones that expose him for being a bisexual?

Funny these guys are into freedom and privacy when it comes to Trump and Bush but not for Hillary.

 

[sealybobo]

And the illusion that the GOP cares is out there.

It worked for Trump, he got the working class.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you agree in the last few decades all the raises have gone to upper management? So while profits and productivity are up, our wages are not keeping up. So why don't the corporations and CEO's just go back to paying us our fair share? This is why the middle class, especially blue collar, are hurting. Do you think the GOP or Trump are going to fix this?

And instead of giving workers wages, they give shareholders more. They used to take care of the workers first but since the 70's they've broke the social contract they used to have with workers. If you go to places like Germany you see the workers still have a social contract with the corporations that do business there. In America, since the 70's, corporations have said workers are worth less so we can give shareholders more. Do you think Trump is going to fix this problem?

These are the reasons why the middle class isn't doing as well as it should be. And you voted out the liberals and democrats expecting the Republicans to fix this?

HA.

Reid and Pelosi took over in 2005, Obama came in in 2008 and your precious Democrats did nothing. Nor did they do it in 1993 when the had the Presidency, the House and the Senate.

I think the idea the Dems would do anything is utter BS.

2007, 2009, actually. If you're party first a-holes like the new bs GOP, it's easy to obstruct unless the Dems have 60% of the Senate, like Obama had for 30 DAYS. Scott Brown was a catastrophe.

If you really believe that then you know with certainty Trump will get nothing passed.

Actually for some reason Bush was able to get more passed with less of a majority. One things for sure the Democrats only obstruct when the GOP try to push something that is unacceptable. But the GOP just obstructed EVERYTHING the Dems tried.

Remember you said Democrats are just as bad? Well, a few of them will prove you right when they cross over and vote with the Republicans. Perhaps they are promised something in return for going along? Perhaps they are threatened?

 

[hadit]

And never has been....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Which is, of course, why she deliberately mixed the two together, to give her plausible reason to delete those she didn't, for whatever reason, want seen. It's a moot point anyway, because her carelessness with national security won't get near the White House without a visitor's pass.

There is no reason. Except in hater dupe world...

You're saying there is no good reason for her to delete emails. Interesting.

No good reason not to. Personal. P-E-R-S-O-N-A-L. Duhhhh. IT'S not A CONSPIRACEE!!!!!

I'd love to comb through all of hadit's emails. Do you think he would delete the ones that expose him for being a bisexual?

Funny these guys are into freedom and privacy when it comes to Trump and Bush but not for Hillary.

The difference between Hillary and me is not that I know how to separate my business emails from my personal ones and she doesn't, because she does. The difference is that I keep them separate and she did not. But you knew that, right?

 

[Papageorgio]

It worked for Trump, he got the working class.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you agree in the last few decades all the raises have gone to upper management? So while profits and productivity are up, our wages are not keeping up. So why don't the corporations and CEO's just go back to paying us our fair share? This is why the middle class, especially blue collar, are hurting. Do you think the GOP or Trump are going to fix this?

And instead of giving workers wages, they give shareholders more. They used to take care of the workers first but since the 70's they've broke the social contract they used to have with workers. If you go to places like Germany you see the workers still have a social contract with the corporations that do business there. In America, since the 70's, corporations have said workers are worth less so we can give shareholders more. Do you think Trump is going to fix this problem?

These are the reasons why the middle class isn't doing as well as it should be. And you voted out the liberals and democrats expecting the Republicans to fix this?

HA.

Reid and Pelosi took over in 2005, Obama came in in 2008 and your precious Democrats did nothing. Nor did they do it in 1993 when the had the Presidency, the House and the Senate.

I think the idea the Dems would do anything is utter BS.

2007, 2009, actually. If you're party first a-holes like the new bs GOP, it's easy to obstruct unless the Dems have 60% of the Senate, like Obama had for 30 DAYS. Scott Brown was a catastrophe.

If you really believe that then you know with certainty Trump will get nothing passed.

Actually for some reason Bush was able to get more passed with less of a majority. One things for sure the Democrats only obstruct when the GOP try to push something that is unacceptable. But the GOP just obstructed EVERYTHING the Dems tried.

Remember you said Democrats are just as bad? Well, a few of them will prove you right when they cross over and vote with the Republicans. Perhaps they are promised something in return for going along? Perhaps they are threatened?

Threatened? By who?

Bush got things passed because he worked with Congress, Obama told Republicans to take a back seat. That was arrogant and it hurt his ability to work with anyone, even fellow Democrats.

 

[sealybobo]

Do you agree in the last few decades all the raises have gone to upper management? So while profits and productivity are up, our wages are not keeping up. So why don't the corporations and CEO's just go back to paying us our fair share? This is why the middle class, especially blue collar, are hurting. Do you think the GOP or Trump are going to fix this?

And instead of giving workers wages, they give shareholders more. They used to take care of the workers first but since the 70's they've broke the social contract they used to have with workers. If you go to places like Germany you see the workers still have a social contract with the corporations that do business there. In America, since the 70's, corporations have said workers are worth less so we can give shareholders more. Do you think Trump is going to fix this problem?

These are the reasons why the middle class isn't doing as well as it should be. And you voted out the liberals and democrats expecting the Republicans to fix this?

HA.

Reid and Pelosi took over in 2005, Obama came in in 2008 and your precious Democrats did nothing. Nor did they do it in 1993 when the had the Presidency, the House and the Senate.

I think the idea the Dems would do anything is utter BS.

2007, 2009, actually. If you're party first a-holes like the new bs GOP, it's easy to obstruct unless the Dems have 60% of the Senate, like Obama had for 30 DAYS. Scott Brown was a catastrophe.

If you really believe that then you know with certainty Trump will get nothing passed.

Actually for some reason Bush was able to get more passed with less of a majority. One things for sure the Democrats only obstruct when the GOP try to push something that is unacceptable. But the GOP just obstructed EVERYTHING the Dems tried.

Remember you said Democrats are just as bad? Well, a few of them will prove you right when they cross over and vote with the Republicans. Perhaps they are promised something in return for going along? Perhaps they are threatened?

Threatened? By who?

I don't know. Maybe like when Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy wouldn't sign the Patriot Act so Chaney mailed them anthrax?

Funny they were the 2 holding up the Patriot Act and they were the only two politicians to be mailed anthrax.

 

[sealybobo]

Which is, of course, why she deliberately mixed the two together, to give her plausible reason to delete those she didn't, for whatever reason, want seen. It's a moot point anyway, because her carelessness with national security won't get near the White House without a visitor's pass.

There is no reason. Except in hater dupe world...

You're saying there is no good reason for her to delete emails. Interesting.

No good reason not to. Personal. P-E-R-S-O-N-A-L. Duhhhh. IT'S not A CONSPIRACEE!!!!!

I'd love to comb through all of hadit's emails. Do you think he would delete the ones that expose him for being a bisexual?

Funny these guys are into freedom and privacy when it comes to Trump and Bush but not for Hillary.

The difference between Hillary and me is not that I know how to separate my business emails from my personal ones and she doesn't, because she does. The difference is that I keep them separate and she did not. But you knew that, right?

They say that it wasn't done to be sneaky. These old politicians don't know shit about technology.

They all did it. Powell did it. You guys always catch Democrats in shit you yourselves do. But you will gladly sacrifice some pawns to take down the queen. Same way you went after clinton for having an affair when all the scumbags going after him were having affairs. It's all about taking out the King and Queen. I can't believe you guys finally beat the clintons. Amazing.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Swiftboating: The act of pointing out what a political candidate has actually done, backed up by bringing in dozens or even hundreds of witnesses who were actually there and watched him do it.
To point out the need to refute his exaggerations and outright lies on the subject and let the electorate decide for themselves whether his reputation deserves to be "damaged" by the truth being revealed.

 

[Papageorgio]

Reid and Pelosi took over in 2005, Obama came in in 2008 and your precious Democrats did nothing. Nor did they do it in 1993 when the had the Presidency, the House and the Senate.

I think the idea the Dems would do anything is utter BS.

2007, 2009, actually. If you're party first a-holes like the new bs GOP, it's easy to obstruct unless the Dems have 60% of the Senate, like Obama had for 30 DAYS. Scott Brown was a catastrophe.

If you really believe that then you know with certainty Trump will get nothing passed.

Actually for some reason Bush was able to get more passed with less of a majority. One things for sure the Democrats only obstruct when the GOP try to push something that is unacceptable. But the GOP just obstructed EVERYTHING the Dems tried.

Remember you said Democrats are just as bad? Well, a few of them will prove you right when they cross over and vote with the Republicans. Perhaps they are promised something in return for going along? Perhaps they are threatened?

Threatened? By who?

I don't know. Maybe like when Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy wouldn't sign the Patriot Act so Chaney mailed them anthrax?

Funny they were the 2 holding up the Patriot Act and they were the only two politicians to be mailed anthrax.

Oh, conspiracy theory and who would threaten now? I tire of all this conspiracy BS.

Maybe you should go to Colorado, Oregon or Washington and get some commercial weed to chill you out.