Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jake calls everybody who doesn't tout the progressive party line a right wing extremist. At the same time, he pretends he's a moderate middle of the road fellow.
It's to desensitize people to his own extremism, and move the middle further to the left.
well when you are looking from his perspective....
Extreme Left --- FakeJake ----------------------------Centrist -------------------------Extreme Right
Jake calls everybody who doesn't tout the progressive party line a right wing extremist. At the same time, he pretends he's a moderate middle of the road fellow.
It's to desensitize people to his own extremism, and move the middle further to the left.
well when you are looking from his perspective....
Extreme Left --- FakeJake ----------------------------Centrist -------------------------Extreme Right
Shouldn't Jake be about 30 dashes to the left?
Stop your whining and pining, son. You are a far right extremist out of touch with the American mainstream who wants nothing to do with the modern 21st century. Simply move on, and leave your betters to their world. Move along.
So you admit you're afraid to answer a simple question?
Well, we knew you were a pussy, so it's understandable...
You often source wikipedia, so why do you complain when others do it?...
You're too stupid to grasp how stupid you look doing that...
How telling that one old GOP mainstreamer can easily refute four (count them) reactionary extremists to the far right.
House asks about Wikipedia, which was never used here by me, and ignores the comptent [sic] repudiation of extremist reactionaery fear from the right of the sources that were used here by me.
Thinking that the our modern left v right debate has anything to do with Hitler is just plain silly.
Claiming that Hitlerism is either a good example socialism OR capitalism gone wrong misses the point entirely.
Of course thinking that our major US political parties are either socialists or facsicsts is equally the stuff of clueless partisans, too, isn't it?
Stop your whining and pining, son. You are a far right extremist out of touch with the American mainstream who wants nothing to do with the modern 21st century. Simply move on, and leave your betters to their world. Move along.
So you admit you're afraid to answer a simple question?
Well, we knew you were a pussy, so it's understandable...
You often source wikipedia, so why do you complain when others do it?...
You're too stupid to grasp how stupid you look doing that...
Stop your whining and pining, son. You are a far right extremist out of touch with the American mainstream who wants nothing to do with the modern 21st century. Simply move on, and leave your betters to their world. Move along.
So you admit you're afraid to answer a simple question?
Well, we knew you were a pussy, so it's understandable...
You often source wikipedia, so why do you complain when others do it?...
You're too stupid to grasp how stupid you look doing that...
Bump...
FakeJake is the one who says it is not a credible source... I never said it wasn't...So you admit you're afraid to answer a simple question?
Well, we knew you were a pussy, so it's understandable...
You often source wikipedia, so why do you complain when others do it?...
You're too stupid to grasp how stupid you look doing that...
Bump...
HouseGimp...you really are the biggest idiot faggot on USMB. Wiki is an excellent source of information. You on the other hand... not. NOTHING on the internet is absolute truth. Wiki is a good place to start when doing research. At least Wiki shows all it's sources. It is up to the user to do due dilligence and check out the sources.
And your last dozen posts were YooToobz and false assumptions... I guess your low IQ needs an outlet, but a few of us got a good laugh out of your stupidity in another thread, so thank you.Your last dozen posts just show how little intelligence you possess and how obssessive [sic] compulsive you are in your internet activity.
Interesting, coming from such a feckless wonder as yourself... Perhaps you can invent a word to convey your inane bleating whenever you stray from posts about homosexuality... I look forward to what a low IQ brain like yours can "invent"...Word for word yours are the most meaningless here at USMB. I would never say "all of the forum" as you do so frequently and erringly but it is sure that MOST of the board thinks you are a useless clown.
How telling that one old GOP mainstreamer can easily refute four (count them) reactionary extremists to the far right.
House asks about Wikipedia, which was never used here by me, and ignores the comptent [sic] repudiation of extremist reactionaery fear from the right of the sources that were used here by me.
That is a lie, FakeJake...
You know it, I know it, and the forum knows it....
Average age of the Swiss is about five years older than Americans, which will count for some of the difference. List of countries by median age - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Interestingly, of the almost twenty countries with older average ages than the Swiss. the great majority have national health care with less pressure on the GDP.
Barry, the far right just won't accept that.
"
"Living With Hitler" attempts to answer these questions by looking at the experiences of German liberals -- namely the leaders of Germany's liberal Democratic Party -- during the twelve years of Hitler's rule.
It shows, first, that German liberals shared many beliefs with their Nazi rivals, and therefore favored some of Hitler's policies even as they opposed National Socialism in other respects. Like the Nazis, the liberals detested Communism and the Versailles Treaty, advocated a right to national self-determination for all ethnic Germans, and possessed nearly unbounded optimism toward science and technology. They supported the Third Reich's Keynesian response to the Great Depression, a moderately interventionist welfare state, and corporatist arrangement between capital and labor. In terms of women's issues, health care, and family policy, there were more than passing affinities between liberal and Nazi programs as well."
Liberals under Nazism: lessons for today? - Short Stack
Maybe if you would read and stop commenting you might comprehend what's being said and discussed.
That would be asking too much from concerned trolls
Staying with the template is all they are capable of....
Some of them even try to claim that statism exist nowhere in the world
Again, before the war, many Progressives. left and right
were fascinated with Fascism and Progressive leaders desperate
to get out of the Great Depression looked at their big gov't ways for guidance
For example
FDR said:
There seems to be no question that [Mussolini] is really interested in what we are doing and I am much interested and deeply impressed by what he has accomplished and by his evidenced honest purpose of restoring Italy.Comment in early 1933 about Benito Mussolini to US Ambassador to Italy Breckinridge Long, as quoted in Three New Deals : Reflections on Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, 1933-1939 (2006) by Wolfgang Schivelbusch, p. 31
I don't mind telling you in confidence that I am keeping in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.
Comment on Benito Mussolini in 1933, as quoted in Three New Deals : Reflections on Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, 1933-1939 (2006) by Wolfgang Schivelbusch, p. 31
Mussolini himself praised the New Deal as following his own corporate state, as quoted in a July 1933 article in the New York Times, "Your plan for coordination of industry follows precisely our lines of cooperation."
Which makes sense since the NRA, with its regulations and industry organizations, was nothing more than another creature of the left- corporatism.
Of course and for good reason, the Left tried to distance themselves from their early fascination with Fascism with the
war and the aftermath.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed
Mussolini said
"The Fascist conception of life, stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only
in so far as his interests coincide with the State. It is opposed to classical liberalism [which] denied the
State in the name of the individual; Fascism reasserts the rights of the State as expressing the real essence of the individual."
As said before,
They are part of the Rousseauian vision. It holds that the collective comes before the individual
----------------------------------------------------------------
Here boy
AT LAST somebody has given a source. Thank you.
1933? The first six months of FDR's presidency? Really? Give us something of worth, NeoTroll.
Notice the far right trolls cannot put their argument into context.
That is typical of Mises drones and followers.
Is what it is: a far right failure again.
I'm asking you why you, a known poster that sources wikipedia, would be concerned about the sources posted by others?
I am voting for Romney and I am glad he will crush the likes of you in the partyThe Nazis were Socialists, leftists. They were not about individual freedom and liberty-----------------------------------
Here boy
You want Frank crushed. You will get you wish. Romney will crush you, too.
Romney is a good guy, and he can see you guys would pull what the Nazis did if you could get away it, so your days are numbered.
