Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're a piece of shit.lol, wicked jester and the fatfailrebel are throwing tantrums for days and in the end bodecea buys them some candy.
bad move, bodecea. that only enables the toddlers.
I fully called it......You can't trust fuckin' liberals. She fully proved my point, by trying to weasel her way out, after so obviously losing.
And now she tries to spin it that she's, "taking the high road'?
You're a piece of shit.
True story!
You're a piece of shit.lol, wicked jester and the fatfailrebel are throwing tantrums for days and in the end bodecea buys them some candy.
bad move, bodecea. that only enables the toddlers.
I fully called it......You can't trust fuckin' liberals. She fully proved my point, by trying to weasel her way out, after so obviously losing.
And now she tries to spin it that she's, "taking the high road'?
True story!
And you're a fake soldier.You're a piece of shit.
I fully called it......You can't trust fuckin' liberals. She fully proved my point, by trying to weasel her way out, after so obviously losing.
And now she tries to spin it that she's, "taking the high road'?
True story!
You're a liberal pussy!
Fully confirmed!
And you're a fake soldier.
Tangent:-Moochele Bachmann April 15, 2010
And you're a fake soldier.You're a piece of shit.
True story!
You're a liberal pussy!
Fully confirmed!
lol, wicked jester and the fatfailrebel are throwing tantrums for days and in the end bodecea buys them some candy.
bad move, bodecea. that only enables the toddlers.
I fully called it......You can't trust fuckin' liberals. She fully proved my point, by trying to weasel her way out, after so obviously losing.
And now she tries to spin it that she's, "taking the high road'?
C-YA!I won by default. changing the rules after the requirments have been met is a default.
Then again if you think about it why does the date of the link matter?
It still meets her requirements. The left was whining about bachman.
You need to look up the definition of default.
But this is what I am going to do, after thinking it over.
I am going to agree that no time period was set for evidence when the bet was made.
I am going to agree that a 30 month old locked thread that someone pulled up for you is good enough to prove your point for the purposes of this bet.
I am going to agree that anytime someone wants to prove a current point by pulling up old data from years ago, it will continue to be good enough.
I am going to agree that I am the one taking the high road and will self-ban for 30 days because even tho I contacted 3 mods, not one of them have yet made a ruling one way or another.
After all, we know that even if a mod did come and agree with me, you would never abide by the bet yourself.
So, I will.
See you in October.
You thoroughly lost, fair and square......Now, don't forget the sig line end of the bet, when you return!
You ought to know by now I get all my insults from precedents already established by CON$ on this board parroting their MessiahRushie just to see them piss and moan when the Golden Rule bites them in their hypocritical asses.Tangent:-Moochele Bachmann April 15, 2010
How quickly would you shit your pants if someone referred to the First Lady as "Moochelle"?
Hoffa called for VOTING the Teabag SOBs out of office, only someone too ignorant to recognize the same name that appears twice in the same post is STUPID enough to call VOTING "incitement!There was no more "violence" in Hoffa's speech than in Moochele's "take out" speech.
Who is Moochele?
Regardless, even if what you claim is true, it's irrelevant. Obama made a point of condemning incitement speech, for the other guys...
It's the hypocrisy, sycophant.
Doesn't change the hypocrisy of your Messiah®, edtheliar.We need you to take out some of these bad guys.
-Moochele Bachmann April 15, 2010
So, once again, instead of avoiding behavior you condemn, you choose to wallow in it. Thanks again for reminding us all of your hypocrisy.You ought to know by now I get all my insults from precedents already established by CON$ on this board parroting their MessiahRushie just to see them piss and moan when the Golden Rule bites them in their hypocritical asses.Tangent:-Moochele Bachmann April 15, 2010
How quickly would you shit your pants if someone referred to the First Lady as "Moochelle"?
Thank you.
BTW, this was explained to you just a few months ago when you played dumb as if CON$ would never stoop to that level. Nice to see you still think you can play dumb and post your phony outrage yet again.
thank you again.
Your last dumb act:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3766223-post262.html
Your fellow CON$ parroting your MessiahRushie starting about a year ago;
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2876462-post10.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2981195-post3.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2981283-post9.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3995756-post85.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/4106537-post3.html
Tangent:-Moochele Bachmann April 15, 2010
How quickly would you shit your pants if someone referred to the First Lady as "Moochelle"?
He was outed by another member.And you're a fake soldier.
You're a liberal pussy!
Fully confirmed!
Having never worn the uniform yourself, how would you know?
So you think it's okay to attack Nancy Reagan -- just not as bad as McKinney?Tangent:-Moochele Bachmann April 15, 2010
How quickly would you shit your pants if someone referred to the First Lady as "Moochelle"?
First Ladies are not in the political game, regardless of the way their chosen 'cause' is politicized by the opposition. I don't think it's acceptable to attack Nancy Reagan and Cynthia McKinney equally.
He was outed by another member.And you're a fake soldier.
Having never worn the uniform yourself, how would you know?
I'm a Cynic, please show where I've said anything about this "moral high ground" Straw Man of yours!!!! As a Cynic, I get Right in the gutter with you CON$ervative scum and beat you at your OWN game. There is nothing "moral" about CON$ervatism so there is no "moral high ground" in the CON$ervative gutter!So, once again, instead of avoiding behavior you condemn, you choose to wallow in it. Thanks again for reminding us all of your hypocrisy.You ought to know by now I get all my insults from precedents already established by CON$ on this board parroting their MessiahRushie just to see them piss and moan when the Golden Rule bites them in their hypocritical asses.Tangent:
How quickly would you shit your pants if someone referred to the First Lady as "Moochelle"?
Thank you.
BTW, this was explained to you just a few months ago when you played dumb as if CON$ would never stoop to that level. Nice to see you still think you can play dumb and post your phony outrage yet again.
thank you again.
Your last dumb act:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3766223-post262.html
Your fellow CON$ parroting your MessiahRushie starting about a year ago;
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2876462-post10.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2981195-post3.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2981283-post9.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/3995756-post85.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/4106537-post3.html
What you delude yourself into believing is the moral high ground is, in fact, a huge pile of horseshit.
Bwhahhahhhahahhahaahhahahhaahahahhahahahhahaaaa!He was outed by another member.And you're a fake soldier.
Having never worn the uniform yourself, how would you know?
No. That's not what I said.So you think it's okay to attack Nancy Reagan -- just not as bad as McKinney?Tangent:
How quickly would you shit your pants if someone referred to the First Lady as "Moochelle"?
First Ladies are not in the political game, regardless of the way their chosen 'cause' is politicized by the opposition. I don't think it's acceptable to attack Nancy Reagan and Cynthia McKinney equally.
Having never worn the uniform yourself, how would you know?
