Hollywood Is Taking Beating At Box Office

[Shattered]

Hell.. While we're at it, you've started entire *threads* based on the content of PM's you weren't happy about receiving.

 

[Gem]

Arch Wrote:

I apologize for what I may had said to you in a pm many months ago...however pms are supposed to be private... between the parties involved..is this not a violation of the rules? No problem I am not complaining... just airing my concern as to where you are going with this! I made a New Years resolution to be a kinder and gentler person...although it is hard from time to time!

No need to apologize, I only mentioned it because your post reminded me of the past posts you have written to me...I am not planning on "going" anywhere with it past this thread. That being said, I admire your New Year's Resolution...it can be tough to bite your tongue so good luck with that.

As to the violation of the rules...as others have stated, I did not refer to a PM, but to rep...which is discussed here all the time. I brought up your previous comments only to clarify my statement "...you do not have to like me or my posts..."

I do not feel that what I said was in any way, a violation of the rules...however if a member of the USMB staff disagrees I will gladly apologize for mentioning your comments.

Cheers.


P.S. While this is fun and all...I would eventually like to be able to get back to talking about the thread topic!!!

 

[archangel]

Arch Wrote:


No need to apologize, I only mentioned it because your post reminded me of the past posts you have written to me...I am not planning on "going" anywhere with it past this thread. That being said, I admire your New Year's Resolution...it can be tough to bite your tongue so good luck with that.

As to the violation of the rules...as others have stated, I did not refer to a PM, but to rep...which is discussed here all the time. I brought up your previous comments only to clarify my statement "...you do not have to like me or my posts..."

I do not feel that what I said was in any way, a violation of the rules...however if a member of the USMB staff disagrees I will gladly apologize for mentioning your comments.

Cheers.


P.S. While this is fun and all...I would eventually like to be able to get back to talking about the thread topic!!!

rep it was not pm..my bad...it was along time ago...carry on!

 

[MissileMan]

being labeled as a know it all...I can attest as to being a former Fed Investigator of child porn...that of the cases I worked 65% of all child porn was related to "Gay" males...go figure! :shocked:

How many cases did you work?

 

[rtwngAvngr]

How many cases did you work?

You afraid he did your?

 

[archangel]

You afraid he did your?

maybe...who knows for sure...don't remember a 'missleman'(pun) though!wonder why he did not go back and cite other threads where I addressed this issue as some in here tonight did? :bangheads

 

[MissileMan]

maybe...who knows for sure...don't remember a 'missleman'(pun) though!wonder why he did not go back and cite other threads where I addressed this issue as some in here tonight did? :bangheads

It's a simple question Arch. And if you can remember the number, perhaps you can include some more details, like if they were all of the cases from the same year, same city, same county, etc.

 

[Annie]

It's a simple question Arch. And if you can remember the number, perhaps you can include some more details, like if they were all of the cases from the same year, same city, same county, etc.

Careful, careful, he probably has 'acquaintances' he can ask to investigate you. Run!

 

[Hobbit]

See now I go away for a while and I miss about 6 pages. Anyway, I'd like to defend something I said earlier. Once again, it's 2 bit, Monday morning, armchair psychology to assume that criticism means that the critic suffers the same problem. It's also a rather convenient way for people such as Menewa to discredit any critics. I mean, if your "basic psychology" was universal, then police officers, D.A.'s, and judges, whose job it is to criticize and judge people, must all be criminals. I mean, a D.A. accuses people of murder all the time. That must mean he's a murderer, right?

 

[007]

See now I go away for a while and I miss about 6 pages.

You and me both Hobbit. 6 pages and about 40 ignored posts for me. Never used the ignore before. Now I wonder why not. It sure cleans up the crap.

Anyway, I'd like to defend something I said earlier. Once again, it's 2 bit, Monday morning, armchair psychology to assume that criticism means that the critic suffers the same problem. It's also a rather convenient way for people such as Menewa to discredit any critics. I mean, if your "basic psychology" was universal, then police officers, D.A.'s, and judges, whose job it is to criticize and judge people, must all be criminals. I mean, a D.A. accuses people of murder all the time. That must mean he's a murderer, right?

I was going to comment on menewa's grade school, "na n'na n'na na, I know you are but what am I" tactic, but I see after reading through all the pages, that's already been done in spades. His tactic is typical liberal jiberish for this topic. EXTREMELY typical. OLD typical. BEEN RODE HARD AND PUT AWAY WET typical. FRIED, DIED, AND LAID TO THE SIDE typical, but, he dug it up and tried it anyway, only to be splashed like an F-22 Raptor ripping apart a MIG 23.

Nice try menewa, but you've been outclassed by just about every single person that responded to your nonsense.

Better luck next time son.

 

[MissileMan]

It's a simple question Arch. And if you can remember the number, perhaps you can include some more details, like if they were all of the cases from the same year, same city, same county, etc.

Yo Arch...where'd ya go?

 

[Said1]

Yo Arch...where'd ya go?

 

[archangel]

Yo Arch...where'd ya go?

and if ya really want to go down this road...AGAIN...ask a mod to dig up my comments on the issue you are persuing...It was already answered and it boring to rehash!

 

[MissileMan]

and if ya really want to go down this road...AGAIN...ask a mod to dig up my comments on the issue you are persuing...It was already answered and it boring to rehash!

Are you that unsure of what you've written before that you're afraid you might contradict yourself? Is providing 2 small pieces of information too much to ask? I know you aren't shy when it comes to repeating things. How many child porn cases did you work on? Were those cases all from the same time frame/geographic area?

Reluctance to provide details might be construed as an attempt to conceal lily gilding.

 

[Annie]

and if ya really want to go down this road...AGAIN...ask a mod to dig up my comments on the issue you are persuing...It was already answered and it boring to rehash!

Ahem, excuse me, but Mods no matter their proclivity towards searches and such are the 'Ask Me' Desk. Unless you know something that no one has clued me into...do your own work.

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Are you that unsure of what you've written before that you're afraid you might contradict yourself? Is providing 2 small pieces of information too much to ask? I know you aren't shy when it comes to repeating things. How many child porn cases did you work on? Were those cases all from the same time frame/geographic area?

Reluctance to provide details might be construed as an attempt to conceal lily gilding.

Just tag my hand as you come flying off the top turnbuckle.

 

[archangel]

Are you that unsure of what you've written before that you're afraid you might contradict yourself? Is providing 2 small pieces of information too much to ask? I know you aren't shy when it comes to repeating things. How many child porn cases did you work on? Were those cases all from the same time frame/geographic area?

Reluctance to provide details might be construed as an attempt to conceal lily gilding.

think what ya want...I already answered this question ie:many other threads...are you related to "Charlie"? Both of you use the same old worn tactics!

 

[The ClayTaurus]

Both of you use the same old worn tactics!

Calling you on your bullshit?
Asking you questions you can't answer?
Laughing at you?

 

[archangel]

Ahem, excuse me, but Mods no matter their proclivity towards searches and such are the 'Ask Me' Desk. Unless you know something that no one has clued me into...do your own work.

but I did not refer a request to you personally...are you that popular? That you would think this...and I suggest that Mr.Missleman do his own homework! :hail:

 

[Annie]

Calling you on your bullshit?
Asking you questions you can't answer?
Laughing at you?

Ya think? Gee, what one could do if they would only say, there might be things to learn...