Holy skitshi 12th District of Ohio to close to call!!! A solid RED district!

[SSGT Bags]

2nd place is always first loser

-Geaux

The Dems are blaming it on The Green Party splitting the vote!

 

[airplanemechanic]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

 

[jon_berzerk]

2nd place is always first loser

-Geaux

The Dems are blaming it on The Green Party splitting the vote!

last night they said the Russians did it --LOL

btw Trump took 5 by 5

--LOL

 

[Nosmo King]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

Dems lost out big time? Big time? The Republicans outspent the Democrats by how much in a district that has been solidly red since when? And Trump had to show up? Exactly what makes up "big time"?

 

[airplanemechanic]

A loss is a loss.

Losing a football game 24-23 is the same as being shut out.

 

[Edgetho]

The American People have more than one enemy --

dimocrap FILTH are number one but close behind them are the GOPe and Kasschit is a shining example of everything that was wrong with it.

Remember, that was the District where that scum-sucker came from. And he worked hard to keep the Republican Candidate from winning. "Damned with faint praise" would fit the type of support the RINO/GOPe Kaschit gave him.

And, oh.......

Close only counts in Horse Shoes and Hydrogen Bombs.

Just ask UberCunt.

Or ManBearPig

 

[Nosmo King]

A loss is a loss.

Losing a football game 24-23 is the same as being shut out.

"Big time"

 

[toobfreak]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.

 

[Nosmo King]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.

This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.

 

[SSGT Bags]

2nd place is always first loser

-Geaux

CNN and MSNBC are both reporting that the Dems finished in 2nd place, while the GOP finished next to last!

 

[August West]

The district has been red for 3 decades and Trump almost blew it for them. Not exactly a sign of a big red wave coming.

 

[dave p]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

Dems lost out big time? Big time? The Republicans outspent the Democrats by how much in a district that has been solidly red since when? And Trump had to show up? Exactly what makes up "big time"?

They didn’t win. Do you need pictures?

 

[kiwiman127]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.

This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.

Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.

 

[airplanemechanic]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.

This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.

Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.

Still lost.

Where is that blue wave?

 

[Indeependent]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

Dems lost out big time? Big time? The Republicans outspent the Democrats by how much in a district that has been solidly red since when? And Trump had to show up? Exactly what makes up "big time"?

You lost...true story.

 

[my2¢]

Does this push Trump into settling these trade deals?​

Think it is a pretty safe guess that both parties will be examining the poll data over the next week. Well off suburbs in northern Franklin / southern Delaware counties while a good part of the rest of the district 12 is rural farming. Not many rust belt type of blue collar jobs in the region.

Unlike southern Franklin County (district 3)…. where I lived for most of my 5 years in the city

​

 

[toobfreak]

The district has been red for 3 decades and Trump almost blew it for them. Not exactly a sign of a big red wave coming.

.... Like I said. Trump is not a republican except in name only, he is a populist, a tea party, even the GOP said as much during the race, yet when the Dems have a close race, rather than admit the race is run on the CANDIDATES, they immediately revert to laying the "blame" on Trump as a reductive force in the GOP. The truth is that if the Dems have a close race in a red district, LOOK AT WHAT THE GOP HAS DONE, or not done, over the past 1.5 years to earn, or not earn, those votes. It looks like the GOP has eroded its support somewhat, but not quite enough that the population wants to resort to putting democrats back in charge! The GOP is already the majority, they have nothing to prove. It's up to the Dems to take the seats and I'm just not seeing any big blue wave as promised.

 

[kiwiman127]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.

This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.

Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.

Still lost.

Where is that blue wave?

OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.

 

[Indeependent]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.

This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.

Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.

Still lost.

Where is that blue wave?

OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.

You lost...true story.

 

[2aguy]

In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.

No can do.

Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive

Remember when they told us that anyone who ran with Trump was toast? That Trump was ballot poison? The cowards on the republican party who have been hiding under their beds as they waited for Trump candidates to lose..... now will have to come out and realize that supporting Trump helps, not hurts.