Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.
Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.
Speaking of hot wet ones, A O-C sure let a few go last night. She was sure a short fifteen minutes.In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.
A loss is a loss.
Losing a football game 24-23 is the same as being shut out.
fact is - they still lost.This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.
Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
Similar to a special election in Western Pa. where Dem Conor Lamb beat Rick Saccone in a district that Trump won by 19+%. Trump came to town to support Saccone. Now that gerrymandering has ended in Pa. Conor Lamb has to run against Keith Rothfus who`s been in Congress since 2012. Lamb leads the polling 51%-39%. Perhaps Rothfus will ask for Trump`s help too.This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.
Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
Moron...
It is a special election.
It is in August.
The same two are running again for November.
Trump was supposed to lose these races for these guys.....his guy won.
You guys can pretend this was a win for you.....it wasn't.
Similar to a special election in Western Pa. where Dem Conor Lamb beat Rick Saccone in a district that Trump won by 19+%. Trump came to town to support Saccone. Now that gerrymandering has ended in Pa. Conor Lamb has to run against Keith Rothfus who`s been in Congress since 2012. Lamb leads the polling 51%-39%. Perhaps Rothfus will ask for Trump`s help too.This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.
Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
Moron...
It is a special election.
It is in August.
The same two are running again for November.
Trump was supposed to lose these races for these guys.....his guy won.
You guys can pretend this was a win for you.....it wasn't.
Poll: Conor Lamb leads Keith Rothfus big, Dem enthusiasm high in key Pa. congressional race
A loss is a loss.This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.
Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
What you don`t know is that the districts have changed since the Pa, Supreme Court undid the gerrymandered districts. Saccone was the incumbent Republican (that means red) and Rothfus is the incumbent (current office holder) and yes, that`s red. I submit that you don`t know shit. I live in Allegheny county btw.Similar to a special election in Western Pa. where Dem Conor Lamb beat Rick Saccone in a district that Trump won by 19+%. Trump came to town to support Saccone. Now that gerrymandering has ended in Pa. Conor Lamb has to run against Keith Rothfus who`s been in Congress since 2012. Lamb leads the polling 51%-39%. Perhaps Rothfus will ask for Trump`s help too.Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
Moron...
It is a special election.
It is in August.
The same two are running again for November.
Trump was supposed to lose these races for these guys.....his guy won.
You guys can pretend this was a win for you.....it wasn't.
Poll: Conor Lamb leads Keith Rothfus big, Dem enthusiasm high in key Pa. congressional race
That is total bullshit. I know the area and many people there where Connor Lamb won. It is a BLUE BLUE BLUE district and they voted HEAVY HILLARY in 2016! They ALWAYS vote blue. I don't know where you get your data but they are full of it!
leave them their pyrrhic victory.Similar to a special election in Western Pa. where Dem Conor Lamb beat Rick Saccone in a district that Trump won by 19+%. Trump came to town to support Saccone. Now that gerrymandering has ended in Pa. Conor Lamb has to run against Keith Rothfus who`s been in Congress since 2012. Lamb leads the polling 51%-39%. Perhaps Rothfus will ask for Trump`s help too.Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
Moron...
It is a special election.
It is in August.
The same two are running again for November.
Trump was supposed to lose these races for these guys.....his guy won.
You guys can pretend this was a win for you.....it wasn't.
Poll: Conor Lamb leads Keith Rothfus big, Dem enthusiasm high in key Pa. congressional race
That is total bullshit. I know the area and many people there where Connor Lamb won. It is a BLUE BLUE BLUE district and they voted HEAVY HILLARY in 2016! They ALWAYS vote blue. I don't know where you get your data but they are full of it!
Here’s what I think...What you don`t know is that the districts have changed since the Pa, Supreme Court undid the gerrymandered districts. Saccone was the incumbent Republican (that means red) and Rothfus is the incumbent (current office holder) and yes, that`s red. I submit that you don`t know shit. I live in Allegheny county btw.Similar to a special election in Western Pa. where Dem Conor Lamb beat Rick Saccone in a district that Trump won by 19+%. Trump came to town to support Saccone. Now that gerrymandering has ended in Pa. Conor Lamb has to run against Keith Rothfus who`s been in Congress since 2012. Lamb leads the polling 51%-39%. Perhaps Rothfus will ask for Trump`s help too.Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
Moron...
It is a special election.
It is in August.
The same two are running again for November.
Trump was supposed to lose these races for these guys.....his guy won.
You guys can pretend this was a win for you.....it wasn't.
Poll: Conor Lamb leads Keith Rothfus big, Dem enthusiasm high in key Pa. congressional race
That is total bullshit. I know the area and many people there where Connor Lamb won. It is a BLUE BLUE BLUE district and they voted HEAVY HILLARY in 2016! They ALWAYS vote blue. I don't know where you get your data but they are full of it!
Guess what? He still won. Spin how you want. He won. In case you missed it, he won.This particular district was considered virtually unflippable. And it's still too close to call.In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
The beauty of the Democrats is that even when they lose (and they do so all the time), they take it as a victory. In every state Hillary lost, in every battle they lose, they focus on the one element: money spent, tightness of race, redness of district, whatever it is that they can turn to and say they DID REALLY WELL . . . CONSIDERING, then spin that into proof that the blue wave is building steam. Even when that steam only turns out to be a hot, wet fart.
Well, as the current vote looks, the GOP candidate only won by .9%, in the previous 2016 election, Trump's spread was about 10% and that district spread for the GOP House winner was a 37%.
Still lost.
Where is that blue wave?
OK goose-stepper, this race was never supposed to be this close. The fact the Trump and other GOP heavy hitters came to the 12th District to campaign for Balderson, plus the historical GOP winning margins, no one expected an only .9% margin.
Facts are against you, Gomer.
In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
But but but NOT BY THAT MUCH!!!!!!!!!
I guess to liberals, at this point, not getting completely clobbered is a victory.
In the special election yesterday, Dems lost out bigtime on what was said was going to be a seat that would change to blue.
No can do.
Dems hang tough in safe GOP districts during special elections, but victories are elusive
It's been Republican since 1983. It's been Democrat ONCE since 1939. That's how Republican it is.
In 2016 Tiberi won by 250,000 to 112,000. More than double. Before that nearly triple, closest was 2008 when it was less than 50,000 votes between the two candidates on the back of Obama doing really well.
They can pump the money is during special elections, but when the whole country's voting, they're going to find it a little tougher.
