Home invasion...thank goodness victims didn't have a gun...grandfather was beaten to death though...

[HereWeGoAgain]

Happened exactly how I said it did. Dont really care if you believe it or not to tell you the truth.
No sense in calling the cops. What are you going to tell em? Three mexicans in an 82 Cutlass with different colored primer quarter panels?
Yeah they'll get right on it...and stop every mexican they see in a beat to shit 82 Cutlass....in Houston.

Happened exactly how I said it did. Dont really care if you believe it or not to tell you the truth.
No sense in calling the cops. What are you going to tell em? Three mexicans in an 82 Cutlass with different colored primer quarter panels?
Yeah they'll get right on it...and stop every mexican they see in a beat to shit 82 Cutlass....in Houston.

How long ago was this?

I dont mind telling you ..but I have to ask,what difference does that make?

I'm curious. Most surveys are asking for defenses in the last 3-5 years. Was curious if yours would qualify.

This was around 25 years ago.

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

 

[Brain357]

How long ago was this?

I dont mind telling you ..but I have to ask,what difference does that make?

I'm curious. Most surveys are asking for defenses in the last 3-5 years. Was curious if yours would qualify.

This was around 25 years ago.

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I dont mind telling you ..but I have to ask,what difference does that make?

I'm curious. Most surveys are asking for defenses in the last 3-5 years. Was curious if yours would qualify.

This was around 25 years ago.

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

 

[Brain357]

I'm curious. Most surveys are asking for defenses in the last 3-5 years. Was curious if yours would qualify.

This was around 25 years ago.

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This was around 25 years ago.

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

 

[Brain357]

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

 

[Correll]

This was around 25 years ago.

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

Actually, it's you that had the "nice try".

You were looking for an excuse to dismiss this example of a defensive use of a gun.

You couldn't shake his story, so now you are pretending that the fact that it was "not in the time range" means it should not be considered.

The point of any personal self defense shows that the self defense argument is valid.

As does this one.

Trouble with details of timing do NOT invalidate the lessons of this example.

 

[Correll]

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

There is nothing questionable about his defense.

Lack of accuracy on time after more than a decade is to be expected. A few fuzzy details?

That you try to spin that into a reason to dismiss this example shows how weak your case is.

 

[Brain357]

Interesting. That brings us to about 1990. No wonder you noticed they were carrying a cell phone. Those were quite rare back then and very big. These must have been some very dumb criminals. Walking up to the door with their very rare big cell phone asking to make a call. It's almost unbelievable.
Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S. 1985 2010

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

Actually, it's you that had the "nice try".

You were looking for an excuse to dismiss this example of a defensive use of a gun.

You couldn't shake his story, so now you are pretending that the fact that it was "not in the time range" means it should not be considered.

The point of any personal self defense shows that the self defense argument is valid.

As does this one.

Trouble with details of timing do NOT invalidate the lessons of this example.

He claimed 3 Mexicans with a cell phone came to his door in 1990. His story was shaken. He then had to change his story to 12-25 years ago to cover his lie. This change then proved what I have been saying about surveys and false positives. Double win for me.

 

[Brain357]

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

There is nothing questionable about his defense.

Lack of accuracy on time after more than a decade is to be expected. A few fuzzy details?

That you try to spin that into a reason to dismiss this example shows how weak your case is.

12-25 years ago? Is your mind that fuzzy too? Mine isn't.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

Again,I dont care what you believe since your acceptance of what happened doesn't change my life one iota.
All I need to know is that shotgun stopped a home invasion. Dont like it? Tough shit.

 

[Brain357]

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

Again,I dont care what you believe since your acceptance of what happened doesn't change my life one iota.
All I need to know is that shotgun stopped a home invasion. Dont like it? Tough shit.

Sure it did. Was that 12 or 25 years ago? Sorry but Sherlock caught you.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

Actually, it's you that had the "nice try".

You were looking for an excuse to dismiss this example of a defensive use of a gun.

You couldn't shake his story, so now you are pretending that the fact that it was "not in the time range" means it should not be considered.

The point of any personal self defense shows that the self defense argument is valid.

As does this one.

Trouble with details of timing do NOT invalidate the lessons of this example.

He claimed 3 Mexicans with a cell phone came to his door in 1990. His story was shaken. He then had to change his story to 12-25 years ago to cover his lie. This change then proved what I have been saying about surveys and false positives. Double win for me.

Now you're just getting pathetic in your attempts to discredit.
You're free to find the at least three posts where I've described the happenings on that day. You'll find them to be exact in every detail.
Maybe I should have back shot the spics. Then I'd have some newspaper clippings to show you.

 

[Brain357]

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

Actually, it's you that had the "nice try".

You were looking for an excuse to dismiss this example of a defensive use of a gun.

You couldn't shake his story, so now you are pretending that the fact that it was "not in the time range" means it should not be considered.

The point of any personal self defense shows that the self defense argument is valid.

As does this one.

Trouble with details of timing do NOT invalidate the lessons of this example.

He claimed 3 Mexicans with a cell phone came to his door in 1990. His story was shaken. He then had to change his story to 12-25 years ago to cover his lie. This change then proved what I have been saying about surveys and false positives. Double win for me.

Now you're just getting pathetic in your attempts to discredit.
You're free to find the at least three posts where I've described the happenings on that day. You'll find them to be exact in every detail.
Maybe I should have back shot the spics. Then I'd have some newspaper clippings to show you.

The only thing pathetic is making up a story that can't be believed. Be mad at yourself for that not me.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

Again,I dont care what you believe since your acceptance of what happened doesn't change my life one iota.
All I need to know is that shotgun stopped a home invasion. Dont like it? Tough shit.

Sure it did. Was that 12 or 25 years ago? Sorry but Sherlock caught you.

If it happened in 1990, it was 25 years ago. What difference at this point does it make (in my best Hillary Clinton voice)?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

Actually, it's you that had the "nice try".

You were looking for an excuse to dismiss this example of a defensive use of a gun.

You couldn't shake his story, so now you are pretending that the fact that it was "not in the time range" means it should not be considered.

The point of any personal self defense shows that the self defense argument is valid.

As does this one.

Trouble with details of timing do NOT invalidate the lessons of this example.

He claimed 3 Mexicans with a cell phone came to his door in 1990. His story was shaken. He then had to change his story to 12-25 years ago to cover his lie. This change then proved what I have been saying about surveys and false positives. Double win for me.

Now you're just getting pathetic in your attempts to discredit.
You're free to find the at least three posts where I've described the happenings on that day. You'll find them to be exact in every detail.
Maybe I should have back shot the spics. Then I'd have some newspaper clippings to show you.

The only thing pathetic is making up a story that can't be believed. Be mad at yourself for that not me.

I believed his story.

 

[Brain357]

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

Again,I dont care what you believe since your acceptance of what happened doesn't change my life one iota.
All I need to know is that shotgun stopped a home invasion. Dont like it? Tough shit.

Sure it did. Was that 12 or 25 years ago? Sorry but Sherlock caught you.

If it happened in 1990, it was 25 years ago. What difference at this point does it make (in my best Hillary Clinton voice)?

25 years ago his story didn't add up. His criminals had a cell phone which was a very rare sight in 1990. Not only did they have a big and rare 1990 cell phone but they walked up holding it and asked to use his phone. No need to defend his lie, I know defenses happen. Just much less than some would have you believe.

 

[Brain357]

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

Actually, it's you that had the "nice try".

You were looking for an excuse to dismiss this example of a defensive use of a gun.

You couldn't shake his story, so now you are pretending that the fact that it was "not in the time range" means it should not be considered.

The point of any personal self defense shows that the self defense argument is valid.

As does this one.

Trouble with details of timing do NOT invalidate the lessons of this example.

He claimed 3 Mexicans with a cell phone came to his door in 1990. His story was shaken. He then had to change his story to 12-25 years ago to cover his lie. This change then proved what I have been saying about surveys and false positives. Double win for me.

Now you're just getting pathetic in your attempts to discredit.
You're free to find the at least three posts where I've described the happenings on that day. You'll find them to be exact in every detail.
Maybe I should have back shot the spics. Then I'd have some newspaper clippings to show you.

The only thing pathetic is making up a story that can't be believed. Be mad at yourself for that not me.

I believed his story.

That's because you are a pro gun nut. You believe anything pro gun without question. I look for the truth however.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I said around 25 years ago.
This happened in our first house which we purchased right after we got married at 24 which would have been around 1990. We lived in that house for 13 years,when it actually happened in that 13 year window I couldnt tell you.
But keep trying ...it's amusing.

Yes if you are going to make up a story it should at least be believable. But at the very least you proved why surveys are so inaccurate. They always ask if it's been in the last 3-5 years. Here you can't remember if it was 12 years ago or 25. Most positive responses in the surveys are not in the actual time range. No further questions.

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try. People caught in a lie are never very happy.

Actually, it's you that had the "nice try".

You were looking for an excuse to dismiss this example of a defensive use of a gun.

You couldn't shake his story, so now you are pretending that the fact that it was "not in the time range" means it should not be considered.

The point of any personal self defense shows that the self defense argument is valid.

As does this one.

Trouble with details of timing do NOT invalidate the lessons of this example.

He claimed 3 Mexicans with a cell phone came to his door in 1990. His story was shaken. He then had to change his story to 12-25 years ago to cover his lie. This change then proved what I have been saying about surveys and false positives. Double win for me.

Which is why I said AROUND 25 years ago.
That same house got struck by lightening and fried every damn electronic in the house and started a small fire.....but I couldnt tell you what year it happened.
Your shit is weak.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I dont give a rats ass about your survey. Nor do I care about your fear of firearms.
The only thing that matters is I was able to protect my wife and myself.
Thank you Remington.
And kiss my ass little boi gun grabber.

Thank you for answering my questions. Nice try.

You taking a survey?

There are very few people who say they have had a defense. The few that claim it are very questionable.

There is nothing questionable about his defense.

Lack of accuracy on time after more than a decade is to be expected. A few fuzzy details?

That you try to spin that into a reason to dismiss this example shows how weak your case is.

12-25 years ago? Is your mind that fuzzy too? Mine isn't.

So you're telling me you can pin point with accuracy every detail of your life?
What a fucken liar.