Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pale Rider said:Evidently nakie didn't see "HOMOSEXUAL" in the definition of "queer". I mean it's right there, but he likes to pretend he doesn't see things that he doesn't like or agree with.
manu1959 said:i thought it was "pencil neck geek"
no1tovote4 said:I remember that song on Dr. Demento.
Pencil neck geek, grit eating freak.
Scum-sucking pee-head with a lousy physique.
You a no-good one-man losing streak.
Nothing but a pencil-necked geek!
Pale Rider said:Evidently nakie didn't see "HOMOSEXUAL" in the definition of "queer". I mean it's right there, but he likes to pretend he doesn't see things that he doesn't like or agree with.
nakedemperor said:Obviously no one can argue with "my god says homosexuality is a sin". So I'm not going to go there. All Christians who believe the bible is literally the word of their god should not be expected to believe otherwise about gay people. But stop bashing them! They're normal people just like everyone else, who are the way they are, for whatever reason, and can and do live safely, harmoniously, and productively everywhere on earth. Live and let live, man.
gop_jeff said:NE, while I would argue that pointing out the sinfulness if homosexuality is justifiable, I agree that bashing gays just for being gay is crossing the line. Unfortunately, there are too many Christians in the world who bash gays as "unsavable" or somehow less worthy of God's love. I think it casts a negative light on Christianity in general and keeps homosexuals from wanting to hear about Christianity at all.
archangel said:Can we move on from this "beating a dead horse issue?"
archangel said:I for one cannot comprehend how anyone would prefer to masturbate their life away...yes I said masturbate....this is all homosexuals do...putting it another way...ultimate narcism...self love and gratification...
nakedemperor said:Whoa whoa, "all homosexuals do"? Sweeping generalizations like this get you nowhere. Gays can be and are productive and responsible members of society. All they do is masturbate? Outdated what?
nakedemperor said:This is a case of a limited definition of sexual intercourse. Re: Bill Clinton
nakedemperor said:This is a case of a limited definition of sexual intercourse. Re: Bill Clinton
nakedemperor They're normal people just like everyone else said:No they are not normal by any means. Face reality Nakey, you'll be better for it.
archangel said:When two people of the same sex engadge in pseudo intercourse...well they are definetly engadged in masturbation...ultimate to be exact...they are putting like parts together...mirror image...in the case of hetrosexuals they are putting parts together that were designed for a purpose other than sexual gratification...even though there is a orgasim to enjoy in the process!
Therefore your arguments are outdated in the realm that they have been argued for centuries...and have been the detriment of many great nations...
Seek counseling...you can be saved...I think!
nakedemperor said:So we've defined homosexual sexual relations as "masturbation". Gravy. Now moving on to the dubious claim that "all they do is masturbate". Where on earth do you get an idea like this? I bet you watch out for those gay bathhouse strories that pop up occasionally on the evening news; this is a stereotype, and a false one at that. By two best friends are a gay couple, and they've been exclusively together for 3 years now. Disease free. One in the Cum Laude society, the other a succesful football player. They're both active in the campus LGBTA. Now tell me, how could they accomplish all this if all they do is fornicate all day, as you've *bluntly* stated? To be honest, the gay people that I know are in fact *more* faithful, less sexually active, and far less sexually aggresive in terms of wearing theirs sexuality on their sleeves than many heteros. I don't think that in general there is a lot that seperates the sexual activities of heteros and homos.
archangel said:We were debating the sexual convictions of homosexuals vs hetrosexuals..
Never said or inferred they were not productive outside the bedroom..This is where it sould stay...not in public forum...I would also take on a hetrosexual be it male or female who expoused say a preference for a female to have intercourse with a male dog or a male who has say a fetish for his girlfriends panties and expoused the desire to marry her panties rather than her...Personally I could care less what consenting adults do in the privacy of the bedroom...just keep it there...no marriage rights! Got it?And no more public school forums saying "It's okay to be gay" It has no place whatsoever in our childrens schools!
-=d=- said:*couldn't care less.
:
![]()
archangel said:In the heat of the moment I forgot to edit...sorry...then again....so what...LOL... Just getting a little bit tired of all this BS on sexual rights...we have major world problems and all we hear about is a persons rights or perceived rights to do whatever makes them feel good... :bangheads![]()