Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The people who "came up" with that definition voted it into law in my state. Don't like it? Don't live here.
Of course it is a mutation and a choice. Much like pedophilia.
It can't be both a mutation and a choice. Those contradict each other.
Pedophilia is also not a mutation. But you know the difference between pedophilia and homosexuality? Pedophilia actually hurts people, children to be specific.
Are you prepared to argue that homosexuality hurts anyone?
Of course htey do not contradict each other.
One has an inclination, that can be genetic.
One acts on it. That's a choice.
Pretty simple.
How much do the consequences of homo behavior cost us in medical bills every year?
Because it has nothing to do with pie.That would be incorrect.
If gay marriage was to be legalized, heterosexual marriage would not be outlawed in the process. Not in the slightest.
What you're saying is that the homosexuals want to dictate that everyone, heterosexual or homosexual, gets served peach pie instead of the traditional apple pie, but that would be incorrect.
What they're actually going for is so that the heterosexuals that like apple pie can get their apple pie and the homosexuals that like peach pie can get peach pie.
I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept for the two of you to grasp.
Heterosexuals get to dictate what defines marriage because they comprise about 97% of the population. And in TN they comprised over 80% of the votes in favor.
Quit whining about how "ohh it's not faaaiiiiirrr." Fairness has nothing to do with it.
So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?
Yes if what they are doing is not harming anyone and is between 2 consenting adults."So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?"
So you think small minorities have the right to redefine the law to suit themselves?
It can't be both a mutation and a choice. Those contradict each other.
Pedophilia is also not a mutation. But you know the difference between pedophilia and homosexuality? Pedophilia actually hurts people, children to be specific.
Are you prepared to argue that homosexuality hurts anyone?
Of course htey do not contradict each other.
One has an inclination, that can be genetic.
One acts on it. That's a choice.
Pretty simple.
How much do the consequences of homo behavior cost us in medical bills every year?
What you are saying then is that their being gay is not a choice its inherent. Their decision to engage in homosexual behavior is as strong as a heterosexuals is to have that type of sex. If thats true what is the problem with it?
Yes if what they are doing is not harming anyone and is between 2 consenting adults."So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?"
So you think small minorities have the right to redefine the law to suit themselves?
Of course htey do not contradict each other.
One has an inclination, that can be genetic.
One acts on it. That's a choice.
Pretty simple.
How much do the consequences of homo behavior cost us in medical bills every year?
What you are saying then is that their being gay is not a choice its inherent. Their decision to engage in homosexual behavior is as strong as a heterosexuals is to have that type of sex. If thats true what is the problem with it?
None. Right up to the point where they demand that others consider it normal behavior. Child molesters say the same thing, it isn't a choice. It is inherent. It is a sexual orientation and just as valid as any other sexual orientation. They too would like for their sexual orientation to be considered normal.
Yes if what they are doing is not harming anyone and is between 2 consenting adults."So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?"
So you think small minorities have the right to redefine the law to suit themselves?
Then it should stay between two consenting adults and not involve everyone else in their lifestyle choices.
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
And quit fucking whining about it.
One does not forfeit his civil liberties merely as a consequence of this state of residence; and the people of a given state do not have the authority to decide who will or who will not have his civil rights, as our rights are inalienable.
The right of citizens to move freely about the country is fundamental, that one is a member of a minority in a given jurisdiction does not justify denying that minority its civil liberties, nor is moving to another state a viable or Constitutional solution.
Yes if what they are doing is not harming anyone and is between 2 consenting adults."So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?"
So you think small minorities have the right to redefine the law to suit themselves?
What you are saying then is that their being gay is not a choice its inherent. Their decision to engage in homosexual behavior is as strong as a heterosexuals is to have that type of sex. If thats true what is the problem with it?
None. Right up to the point where they demand that others consider it normal behavior. Child molesters say the same thing, it isn't a choice. It is inherent. It is a sexual orientation and just as valid as any other sexual orientation. They too would like for their sexual orientation to be considered normal.
It is normal for them. How are you missing that? Pedo are not having sex with an adult. Thats statutory rape which is the same for heteros and homosexuals alike.
Yes if what they are doing is not harming anyone and is between 2 consenting adults."So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?"
So you think small minorities have the right to redefine the law to suit themselves?
You are wrong.
The people who "came up" with that definition voted it into law in my state. Don't like it? Don't live here.
Of course it is a mutation and a choice. Much like pedophilia.
It can't be both a mutation and a choice. Those contradict each other.
Pedophilia is also not a mutation. But you know the difference between pedophilia and homosexuality? Pedophilia actually hurts people, children to be specific.
Are you prepared to argue that homosexuality hurts anyone?
Of course htey do not contradict each other.
One has an inclination, that can be genetic.
One acts on it. That's a choice.
Pretty simple.
How much do the consequences of homo behavior cost us in medical bills every year?
None. Right up to the point where they demand that others consider it normal behavior. Child molesters say the same thing, it isn't a choice. It is inherent. It is a sexual orientation and just as valid as any other sexual orientation. They too would like for their sexual orientation to be considered normal.
It is normal for them. How are you missing that? Pedo are not having sex with an adult. Thats statutory rape which is the same for heteros and homosexuals alike.
No it isn't. Doesn't the Kaitlyn Hunt case mean anything to do. A lesbian pedophile isn't the same as a heterosexual pedophile.
Cannibalism was "normal" for Jeffrey Dahmer too.
Yes if what they are doing is not harming anyone and is between 2 consenting adults.
You are wrong.
Do you have some proof?
Because it has nothing to do with pie.
Heterosexuals get to dictate what defines marriage because they comprise about 97% of the population. And in TN they comprised over 80% of the votes in favor.
Quit whining about how "ohh it's not faaaiiiiirrr." Fairness has nothing to do with it.
So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?
Sure. Otherwise cities would not have ordinances and states would not have state laws. You do not have the right to marry your sister or your dog, or the two year old neighbor. You do not have the right to park your car anywhere you feel like. You do not (as we recently discovered) have the right to walk in a forest when you want to. You do not have the right to live in any home you want. You do not have the right to force others to agree to your demands.
You are wrong.
Do you have some proof?
Baker Who Lost Shop After Refusing Gay Couple?s Wedding Cake Has Surprise Reaction to Ongoing Attacks: ?My Eternal Home Is What Matters? | Video | TheBlaze.com
Court Holds That Wedding Photographer Cannot Refuse Service To Gay Couples
Iowa's Gortz Haus Under Fire For Rejecting Gay Couple Who Sought Wedding Venue
Failure to treat homosexuality as normal behavior has certainly harmed others.
"So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?"
So you think small minorities have the right to redefine the law to suit themselves?
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.
And quit fucking whining about it.
One does not forfeit his civil liberties merely as a consequence of this state of residence; and the people of a given state do not have the authority to decide who will or who will not have his civil rights, as our rights are inalienable.
The right of citizens to move freely about the country is fundamental, that one is a member of a minority in a given jurisdiction does not justify denying that minority its civil liberties, nor is moving to another state a viable or Constitutional solution.
No one's civil liberties are forfeited. There is no civil liberty case here. That argument has already been refuted.
I don't see where they are involving you. It is you who are demanding that the government acknowledge your hatred of gaysYes if what they are doing is not harming anyone and is between 2 consenting adults."So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?"
So you think small minorities have the right to redefine the law to suit themselves?
Then it should stay between two consenting adults and not involve everyone else in their lifestyle choices.
