Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And they have exactly the same right of marriage as any other citizen. I'm heterosexual and I can't marry another man either.I don't see anything about class in here. Just "citizens". Which...homosexuals are.
Derp.
Dork.
Would legalizing gay marriage take away your ability to marry the opposite sex?
No, no it wouldn't.
Let's say you're having a business party in which everyone is given a slice of apple pie. Assume everyone is required to attend.
2 people come up to the counter.
Person #1 says "Mmm, apple pie! My favorite! I'll have 3 slices please!"
Person #2 says "Ick, apple pie! Don't you have something tasty, like peach pie?"
The person behind the counter replies "We're sorry sir, but everyone has the right to apple pie here; we refuse to serve you peach pie even though we have some behind us."
So you've perverted the idea from "You have the right to eat what you want" to "You have the right to eat what we tell you to eat", except it's become "You have the right to marry whatever gender you want" to "You have the right to marry the gender we tell you to".
When they normalized homosexuality, they were in their Golden Ages.
Did you say "age" or "shower"?
When they normalized homosexuality, they were in their Golden Ages.
Did you say "age" or "shower"?
It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.And they have exactly the same right of marriage as any other citizen. I'm heterosexual and I can't marry another man either.
Dork.
Would legalizing gay marriage take away your ability to marry the opposite sex?
No, no it wouldn't.
Let's say you're having a business party in which everyone is given a slice of apple pie. Assume everyone is required to attend.
2 people come up to the counter.
Person #1 says "Mmm, apple pie! My favorite! I'll have 3 slices please!"
Person #2 says "Ick, apple pie! Don't you have something tasty, like peach pie?"
The person behind the counter replies "We're sorry sir, but everyone has the right to apple pie here; we refuse to serve you peach pie even though we have some behind us."
So you've perverted the idea from "You have the right to eat what you want" to "You have the right to eat what we tell you to eat", except it's become "You have the right to marry whatever gender you want" to "You have the right to marry the gender we tell you to".
Deflection is not an option here.
The Tennessee State Constitution defines "marriage" as one man and one woman. Someone can go to MA and get married any way they want. But if it isn't one man and one woman they are not married in TN.
Don't like it? Go live somewhere else.
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.Would legalizing gay marriage take away your ability to marry the opposite sex?
No, no it wouldn't.
Let's say you're having a business party in which everyone is given a slice of apple pie. Assume everyone is required to attend.
2 people come up to the counter.
Person #1 says "Mmm, apple pie! My favorite! I'll have 3 slices please!"
Person #2 says "Ick, apple pie! Don't you have something tasty, like peach pie?"
The person behind the counter replies "We're sorry sir, but everyone has the right to apple pie here; we refuse to serve you peach pie even though we have some behind us."
So you've perverted the idea from "You have the right to eat what you want" to "You have the right to eat what we tell you to eat", except it's become "You have the right to marry whatever gender you want" to "You have the right to marry the gender we tell you to".
Deflection is not an option here.
The Tennessee State Constitution defines "marriage" as one man and one woman. Someone can go to MA and get married any way they want. But if it isn't one man and one woman they are not married in TN.
Don't like it? Go live somewhere else.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
School district to reconsider allowing teachers to discuss homosexuality in the classroom - CNN.com They barred it in 2009 now reconsidering it.
California passes bill mandating pro-gay teaching in schools, no parent opt-out | LifeSiteNews.com
WHOLE STATE will be taught it.
During Monday night's hearing, the school board will propose replacing that policy with a "controversial topics curriculum policy" that, according to the proposed wording, "recognizes the importance of providing information about controversial topics in a democracy."
However, it states that teachers and staff "shall not advocate personal beliefs or opinions" regarding those controversial topics -- which are not named -- in the classroom.
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.Deflection is not an option here.
The Tennessee State Constitution defines "marriage" as one man and one woman. Someone can go to MA and get married any way they want. But if it isn't one man and one woman they are not married in TN.
Don't like it? Go live somewhere else.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
And quit fucking whining about it.
Its a gateway...course its california what can we expect.School district to reconsider allowing teachers to discuss homosexuality in the classroom - CNN.com They barred it in 2009 now reconsidering it.
California passes bill mandating pro-gay teaching in schools, no parent opt-out | LifeSiteNews.com
WHOLE STATE will be taught it.
Article 1:
During Monday night's hearing, the school board will propose replacing that policy with a "controversial topics curriculum policy" that, according to the proposed wording, "recognizes the importance of providing information about controversial topics in a democracy."
However, it states that teachers and staff "shall not advocate personal beliefs or opinions" regarding those controversial topics -- which are not named -- in the classroom.
They're not allowed to take a side on homosexuality. They can't say it's good or bad. It also doesn't necessarily include actual sexual practices.
Article 2:
That talks about the accomplishments of people who were homosexual...that has nothing to do with actual gay sex.
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
And quit fucking whining about it.
Thanks for confirming that you're saying exactly what I said you were saying.
It's appreciated.
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.
And quit fucking whining about it.
Thanks for confirming that you're saying exactly what I said you were saying.
It's appreciated.
OK. Then i assume you're fine with it.
Bottom line it was still 2 or more guys having sex with other. You cant explain it away because of the social context.
It was very different. There was no "gay marriage" in ancient Greece. A younger boy would hook up with an older man for a while. Then he would get married to a woman and have a family. Very few people were effiminately homosexual all their lives. And they were made merciless fun of if they were.
Not at all. It was 2 guys having sex. Nothing different about it. i wasnt even talking about marriage. My point is that homosexuality has always been around and always will. its not a choice. Its natures way of providing population control is my best guess.
Thanks for confirming that you're saying exactly what I said you were saying.
It's appreciated.
OK. Then i assume you're fine with it.
No, it means I'm done arguing with you because the concept seems to be lost on you.
It was very different. There was no "gay marriage" in ancient Greece. A younger boy would hook up with an older man for a while. Then he would get married to a woman and have a family. Very few people were effiminately homosexual all their lives. And they were made merciless fun of if they were.
Not at all. It was 2 guys having sex. Nothing different about it. i wasnt even talking about marriage. My point is that homosexuality has always been around and always will. its not a choice. Its natures way of providing population control is my best guess.
Homosexuality has always been around and always will be around as a naturally occurring abnormality.
Accepting it and treating homosexualty as normal behavior instead of the abnormality it is, is a signal of a civilization in decay. Healthy cultures do not treat homosexuality as normal behavior. Only sick ones do.
If its naturally occurring then its normal for it to occur to some individuals. Accepting that fact leads to more intelligent people. You are going backwards and your post just revealed that.Not at all. It was 2 guys having sex. Nothing different about it. i wasnt even talking about marriage. My point is that homosexuality has always been around and always will. its not a choice. Its natures way of providing population control is my best guess.
Homosexuality has always been around and always will be around as a naturally occurring abnormality.
Accepting it and treating homosexualty as normal behavior instead of the abnormality it is, is a signal of a civilization in decay. Healthy cultures do not treat homosexuality as normal behavior. Only sick ones do.
Did you really just write that!
It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
I think that what he is actually saying is that homosexuals do not have a right to dicktate what kind of pie is being served. I agree.
Homosexuality has always been around and always will be around as a naturally occurring abnormality.
Accepting it and treating homosexualty as normal behavior instead of the abnormality it is, is a signal of a civilization in decay. Healthy cultures do not treat homosexuality as normal behavior. Only sick ones do.
Did you really just write that!
Down's Syndrome occurs naturally but no one would call that normal.
Homosexuality has always been around and always will be around as a naturally occurring abnormality.
Accepting it and treating homosexualty as normal behavior instead of the abnormality it is, is a signal of a civilization in decay. Healthy cultures do not treat homosexuality as normal behavior. Only sick ones do.
Did you really just write that!
Down's Syndrome occurs naturally but no one would call that normal.
