Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because it has nothing to do with pie.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
I think that what he is actually saying is that homosexuals do not have a right to dicktate what kind of pie is being served. I agree.
That would be incorrect.
If gay marriage was to be legalized, heterosexual marriage would not be outlawed in the process. Not in the slightest.
What you're saying is that the homosexuals want to dictate that everyone, heterosexual or homosexual, gets served peach pie instead of the traditional apple pie, but that would be incorrect.
What they're actually going for is so that the heterosexuals that like apple pie can get their apple pie and the homosexuals that like peach pie can get peach pie.
I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept for the two of you to grasp.
Did you really just write that!If its naturally occurring then its normal for it to occur to some individuals. Accepting that fact leads to more intelligent people. You are going backwards and your post just revealed that.
Down's Syndrome occurs naturally but no one would call that normal.
Down's Syndrome is a mutation. It doesn't count.
Down's Syndrome occurs naturally but no one would call that normal.
Down's Syndrome is a mutation. It doesn't count.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
Because it has nothing to do with pie.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
I think that what he is actually saying is that homosexuals do not have a right to dicktate what kind of pie is being served. I agree.
That would be incorrect.
If gay marriage was to be legalized, heterosexual marriage would not be outlawed in the process. Not in the slightest.
What you're saying is that the homosexuals want to dictate that everyone, heterosexual or homosexual, gets served peach pie instead of the traditional apple pie, but that would be incorrect.
What they're actually going for is so that the heterosexuals that like apple pie can get their apple pie and the homosexuals that like peach pie can get peach pie.
I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept for the two of you to grasp.
Heterosexuals get to dictate what defines marriage because they comprise about 97% of the population. And in TN they comprised over 80% of the votes in favor.
Quit whining about how "ohh it's not faaaiiiiirrr." Fairness has nothing to do with it.
Down's Syndrome occurs naturally but no one would call that normal.
Down's Syndrome is a mutation. It doesn't count.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
the changing of the structure of a gene, resulting in a variant form that may be transmitted to subsequent generations, caused by the alteration of single base units in DNA, or the deletion, insertion, or rearrangement of larger sections of genes or chromosomes.
If you're against blacks, does that mean you're black?
If you're against Nazis, does that mean you're a Nazi?
If you're against Hispanics, does that mean you're Hispanic?
If you're against Jews, does that mean you're a Jew?
Are any of those groups attracting hate because of their sexual preference? What does that have to do with being a closet gay person if you are hating on gays? There is absolutely nothing you can point to that a gay person does that effects you in anyway unless they force you to watch them have sex. You wish you had the courage to participate but are afraid and practically everyone knows it.
Actually being homosexual is the least of the reasons I hate fags. They want to indoctrinate kids into thinking their lifestyle is normal,the parades,the whining in the news etc etc etc...christ we could go on...Its bad enough with schools "teaching" sex ed which belongs at home with the parents teaching it but putting homosexual garbage in there is wrong. They want to indoctrinate kids into thinking like them. Not gonna happen. Being a parent is a tough job and its even tougher in this day and age when you must protect them from *******,jews,faggots all wanting to either kill them,rape them or indoctrinate them.
Down's Syndrome is a mutation. It doesn't count.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
Down's Syndrome is a mutation. It doesn't count.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
Down's Syndrome is a mutation. It doesn't count.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
Because it has nothing to do with pie.That would be incorrect.
If gay marriage was to be legalized, heterosexual marriage would not be outlawed in the process. Not in the slightest.
What you're saying is that the homosexuals want to dictate that everyone, heterosexual or homosexual, gets served peach pie instead of the traditional apple pie, but that would be incorrect.
What they're actually going for is so that the heterosexuals that like apple pie can get their apple pie and the homosexuals that like peach pie can get peach pie.
I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept for the two of you to grasp.
Heterosexuals get to dictate what defines marriage because they comprise about 97% of the population. And in TN they comprised over 80% of the votes in favor.
Quit whining about how "ohh it's not faaaiiiiirrr." Fairness has nothing to do with it.
Why does it matter to you that heterosexuals dictate who homosexuals can marry?
"Because heterosexuals said so" is not an answer.
If 97% of the population was Hindu and they wanted to outlaw Christianity, should they be allowed to do it? After all, they're the majority of the population.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
the changing of the structure of a gene, resulting in a variant form that may be transmitted to subsequent generations, caused by the alteration of single base units in DNA, or the deletion, insertion, or rearrangement of larger sections of genes or chromosomes.
Down's Syndrome fits the definition of a mutation.
Homosexuality doesn't.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
It may not be a choice. Treating it as normal is the choice.
Because it has nothing to do with pie.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
I think that what he is actually saying is that homosexuals do not have a right to dicktate what kind of pie is being served. I agree.
That would be incorrect.
If gay marriage was to be legalized, heterosexual marriage would not be outlawed in the process. Not in the slightest.
What you're saying is that the homosexuals want to dictate that everyone, heterosexual or homosexual, gets served peach pie instead of the traditional apple pie, but that would be incorrect.
What they're actually going for is so that the heterosexuals that like apple pie can get their apple pie and the homosexuals that like peach pie can get peach pie.
I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept for the two of you to grasp.
Heterosexuals get to dictate what defines marriage because they comprise about 97% of the population. And in TN they comprised over 80% of the votes in favor.
Quit whining about how "ohh it's not faaaiiiiirrr." Fairness has nothing to do with it.
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
It's called the homophobe delusion.
They came up with this idea that marriage is strictly limited to heterosexuals because they said it is, and that homosexuality is a mutation and a choice at the same time.
Funny how that works.
Because it has nothing to do with pie.That would be incorrect.
If gay marriage was to be legalized, heterosexual marriage would not be outlawed in the process. Not in the slightest.
What you're saying is that the homosexuals want to dictate that everyone, heterosexual or homosexual, gets served peach pie instead of the traditional apple pie, but that would be incorrect.
What they're actually going for is so that the heterosexuals that like apple pie can get their apple pie and the homosexuals that like peach pie can get peach pie.
I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept for the two of you to grasp.
Heterosexuals get to dictate what defines marriage because they comprise about 97% of the population. And in TN they comprised over 80% of the votes in favor.
Quit whining about how "ohh it's not faaaiiiiirrr." Fairness has nothing to do with it.
So you think you get to vote on what rights others are allowed to have?
Because it has nothing to do with pie.
Heterosexuals get to dictate what defines marriage because they comprise about 97% of the population. And in TN they comprised over 80% of the votes in favor.
Quit whining about how "ohh it's not faaaiiiiirrr." Fairness has nothing to do with it.
Why does it matter to you that heterosexuals dictate who homosexuals can marry?
"Because heterosexuals said so" is not an answer.
If 97% of the population was Hindu and they wanted to outlaw Christianity, should they be allowed to do it? After all, they're the majority of the population.
the changing of the structure of a gene, resulting in a variant form that may be transmitted to subsequent generations, caused by the alteration of single base units in DNA, or the deletion, insertion, or rearrangement of larger sections of genes or chromosomes.
Down's Syndrome fits the definition of a mutation.
Homosexuality doesn't.
Because doing so would destroy your argument?
Because it refutes the argument?
Homosexuality is a mutation too.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
Bloodlust might be a mutation too. But that doesnt excuse murder.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
It's called the homophobe delusion.
They came up with this idea that marriage is strictly limited to heterosexuals because they said it is, and that homosexuality is a mutation and a choice at the same time.
Funny how that works.
The people who "came up" with that definition voted it into law in my state. Don't like it? Don't live here.
Of course it is a mutation and a choice. Much like pedophilia.
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.Deflection is not an option here.
The Tennessee State Constitution defines "marriage" as one man and one woman. Someone can go to MA and get married any way they want. But if it isn't one man and one woman they are not married in TN.
Don't like it? Go live somewhere else.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
And quit fucking whining about it.
If its a mutation how can it be a choice?
It's called the homophobe delusion.
They came up with this idea that marriage is strictly limited to heterosexuals because they said it is, and that homosexuality is a mutation and a choice at the same time.
Funny how that works.
The people who "came up" with that definition voted it into law in my state. Don't like it? Don't live here.
Of course it is a mutation and a choice. Much like pedophilia.
It's called the homophobe delusion.
They came up with this idea that marriage is strictly limited to heterosexuals because they said it is, and that homosexuality is a mutation and a choice at the same time.
Funny how that works.
The people who "came up" with that definition voted it into law in my state. Don't like it? Don't live here.
Of course it is a mutation and a choice. Much like pedophilia.
It can't be both a mutation and a choice. Those contradict each other.
Pedophilia is also not a mutation. But you know the difference between pedophilia and homosexuality? Pedophilia actually hurts people, children to be specific.
Are you prepared to argue that homosexuality hurts anyone?
No, I'm saying if homos want the state to recognize their "marriage" then they need to move to a state that will. Much like if people want to carry handguns they ought to move to a state that allows it. Or if people want a state that allows late term abortions, they need to go to such a state.It's not a deflection; it's actually what you're saying.
You're saying that if homosexuals don't like the same pie that you do, they have to move to get their favorite kind of pie.
It's bullshit.
And quit fucking whining about it.
One does not forfeit his civil liberties merely as a consequence of this state of residence; and the people of a given state do not have the authority to decide who will or who will not have his civil rights, as our rights are inalienable.
The right of citizens to move freely about the country is fundamental, that one is a member of a minority in a given jurisdiction does not justify denying that minority its civil liberties, nor is moving to another state a viable or Constitutional solution.
