Hope Hicks expected to testify in Trump hush money trial

[Lakhota]

Former White House aide Hope Hicks is expected to testify in former President Donald Trump’s New York hush money payment trial, according to a source with direct knowledge of the situation. NBC News’ Vaughn Hillyard reports on what information Hicks may be able to provide during her testimony.



Hope Hicks expected to testify in Trump hush money trial

Interesting. If she does testify - will it be for or against Trump? She will be under oath. This adds another level of uncertainty to the trial. What do you think?

 

[Rambunctious]

This is the weakest case against Trump....

 

[Lakhota]

This is the weakest case against Trump....

Maybe. Maybe not.

 

[Rambunctious]

Maybe. Maybe not.

Everyone says it is... that its laughable... and the judge is acting out in anger and that will doom this case...

 

[Lakhota]

Everyone says it is... that its laughable... and the judge is acting out in anger and that will doom this case...

Please explain how the judge is acting out in anger.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Everyone says it is... that its laughable... and the judge is acting out in anger and that will doom this case...

who's 'everyone?'

 

[surada]

Former White House aide Hope Hicks is expected to testify in former President Donald Trump’s New York hush money payment trial, according to a source with direct knowledge of the situation. NBC News’ Vaughn Hillyard reports on what information Hicks may be able to provide during her testimony.



Hope Hicks expected to testify in Trump hush money trial

Interesting. If she does testify - will it be for or against Trump? She will be under oath. This adds another level of uncertainty to the trial. What do you think?

All she can do is tell the truth. It's very simple.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Everyone says it is... that its laughable... and the judge is acting out in anger and that will doom this case...

.

The cult that has no perspective but anger.

.

 

[SeaMajor7]

tHE sTaLiNisT sTruGgLe

 

[Rambunctious]

Please explain how the judge is acting out in anger.

Starting with a unconstitutional gag order.... before the trial even began...

 

[Harpy Eagle]

This is the weakest case against Trump....

I would not be so sure. Nobody is questioning if it happened, just if it were illegal.

 

[MagicMike]

Everyone says it is

Whom exactly?

 

[struth]

The demafascsit are desperate.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Starting with a unconstitutional gag order.... before the trial even began...

There is nothing unconstitutional about gag orders, the SCOTUS has upheld them

 

[surada]

tHE sTaLiNisT sTruGgLe

There's no struggle. The courts will just do what they do.

 

[surada]

There is nothing unconstitutional about gag orders, the SCOTUS has upheld them

Trump just makes things worse. Sad.

 

[Rambunctious]

There is nothing unconstitutional about gag orders, the SCOTUS has upheld them

Prior restraint is unconstitutional.... especially in a case against a former president....

Prior Restraint

Prior restraint allows the government to review the content of printed materials and prevent their publication. Prior restraint usually violates the First Amendment.

firstamendment.mtsu.edu

 

[Rambunctious]

Whom exactly?

 

[Auld Phart]

This is the weakest case against Trump....

Lakhotas motto: any port in a storm.

 

[Rambunctious]

Prior restraint is not allowed under our constitution... look it up...
Laws and rules should not change just because the court hates the defendant....