- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,517
- 63,178
- 3,605
Trump will verbally attack a witness??? so what this is America...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Prior restraint is unconstitutional.... especially in a case against a former president....
Prior Restraint
Prior restraint allows the government to review the content of printed materials and prevent their publication. Prior restraint usually violates the First Amendment.firstamendment.mtsu.edu
Please explain how the judge is acting out in anger.
Former White House aide Hope Hicks is expected to testify in former President Donald Trump’s New York hush money payment trial, according to a source with direct knowledge of the situation. NBC News’ Vaughn Hillyard reports on what information Hicks may be able to provide during her testimony.
Hope Hicks expected to testify in Trump hush money trial
Interesting. If she does testify - will it be for or against Trump? She will be under oath. This adds another level of uncertainty to the trial. What do you think?
The prosecution would absolutely love if he testified I am sure.A judge can not tell an innocent man he can't speak in his own defense...
It is prior restraint because the gag order was imposed before the trial started and without cause...That is very nice, a gag order is not prior restraint
This gag order is for outside the courtroom....The prosecution would absolutely love if he testified I am sure.
She will soon be labeled a RINO and a Traitor.Everyone says it is... that its laughable... and the judge is acting out in anger and that will doom this case...
True, the trump CULT is full of Anger.
The cult that has no perspective but anger.
.
A judge can not tell an innocent man he can't speak in his own defense...
Trump will verbally attack a witness??? so what this is America...
A judge can not impose a gag order on an innocent man... and the presumption of innocence doesn't go away just because of whom the defendant is....
It is prior restraint because the gag order was imposed before the trial started and without cause...
A judge can not impose a gag order on an innocent man... and the presumption of innocence doesn't go away just because of whom the defendant is....
Maybe. Maybe not.
Do you TDS libs want to give up the presumption of innocence in America?...