Hospital Won't Back Obama Birth Claim

[CrimsonWhite]

If I was Obama I wouldn't produce SHIT for your dumbasses!

AND........

I'd tell you to KISS my ENTIRE Black Ass!

Can't BELIEVE this shit is STILL going on!

WHAT other fucking president has EVER had to go thru this?

You HAVE to wonder why.......

Keep it your pocket.

 

[Modbert]

Keep it your pocket.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_v63oTveUEGI/SVzd-H9APqI/AAAAAAAAHpU/PwIS_ZuLzYo/s400/race_card.gif

I choose you Pikachu!



Use Thundershock!

 

[DiveCon]

If I was Obama I wouldn't produce SHIT for your dumbasses!

AND........

I'd tell you to KISS my ENTIRE Black Ass!

Can't BELIEVE this shit is STILL going on!

WHAT other fucking president has EVER had to go thru this?

You HAVE to wonder why.......

LOL

gee, Reagan, Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43
they all got it
what makes Obama special?

 

[Modbert]

LOL

gee, Reagan, Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43
they all got it
what makes Obama special?

(Of course, my feelings on this issue are well known, that this issue is completely bogus.)

 

[DiveCon]

LOL

gee, Reagan, Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43
they all got it
what makes Obama special?

View attachment 7622

(Of course, my feelings on this issue are well known, that this issue is completely bogus.)

but this is nothing new
there were tons of rumors anhd CT's on Reagan, and Bush 41
and who can forget the Clinton death list and the other many conspiracies
and with Bush 43 i think it broke records for the number of stupid CT's that have been called on him
Obama is just the new kid on the block

 

[Modbert]

but this is nothing new
there were tons of rumors anhd CT's on Reagan, and Bush 41
and who can forget the Clinton death list and the other many conspiracies
and with Bush 43 i think it broke records for the number of stupid CT's that have been called on him
Obama is just the new kid on the block

Oh, I thought you were referring to the birth certificate stuff, not in general.

My favorite CT so far is that Obama was born a Socialist Muslim who was trained in the Soviet Union and came to America to turn us all into Socialists.

 

[DiveCon]

but this is nothing new
there were tons of rumors anhd CT's on Reagan, and Bush 41
and who can forget the Clinton death list and the other many conspiracies
and with Bush 43 i think it broke records for the number of stupid CT's that have been called on him
Obama is just the new kid on the block

Oh, I thought you were referring to the birth certificate stuff, not in general.

My favorite CT so far is that Obama was born a Socialist Muslim who was trained in the Soviet Union and came to America to turn us all into Socialists.

never seen THAT one

 

[Modbert]

never seen THAT one

Well actually it gets so much better, I was trying to remember it and found it sorta:

In a February 10, 2009, column, Janet Porter further alleged that President Obama was acting as a mole for the Soviet Union. Porter suggested that Obama was raised as an atheist and Communist and was subsequently trained by Soviet agents during the early 1990s. Porter also suggested that Obama's election as president was the result of a long-term Communist conspiracy. Porter's only evidence for these allegations was a series of uncorroborated claims made to her by an American computer programmer, who claimed to have spoken to a Russian scientist in 1994 who told him that Obama was a Communist and was being groomed by Russian agents to infiltrate the presidency

That column was posted on WND if you were wondering. It's just such a lulzy CT.

 

[DiveCon]

never seen THAT one

Well actually it gets so much better, I was trying to remember it and found it sorta:

In a February 10, 2009, column, Janet Porter further alleged that President Obama was acting as a mole for the Soviet Union. Porter suggested that Obama was raised as an atheist and Communist and was subsequently trained by Soviet agents during the early 1990s. Porter also suggested that Obama's election as president was the result of a long-term Communist conspiracy. Porter's only evidence for these allegations was a series of uncorroborated claims made to her by an American computer programmer, who claimed to have spoken to a Russian scientist in 1994 who told him that Obama was a Communist and was being groomed by Russian agents to infiltrate the presidency

That column was posted on WND if you were wondering. It's just such a lulzy CT.

never read WND
i figure its not worth my time when they get so much WRONG
lol

 

[eots]

if he was eligible for the presidency without question they would not be blocking lawsuits that are trying to prove this,,he was not born in Hawaii


Obama Not Eligible For Presidency?
By DMartyr · Wednesday, October 22. 2008 07:22
Philip Berg has filed for a default win in his case against Barack Hussein [no response] Obama. According to Berg, Obama's failure to respond in a timely manner amounts to an admission of guilt.

Obama could have avoided this entire issue by simply providing his original birth certificate to prove he is constitutionally qualified to run for the office of U.S. President. Instead, his attorneys have tried to have the case dismissed.

This action only begs the question: What is Barack Hussein Obama hiding?



http://snappedshot.com/archives/3018-Obama-Not-Eligible-For-Presidency.html

 

[Modbert]

if he was eligible for the presidency without question they would not be blocking lawsuits that are trying to prove this,,he was not born in Hawaii

See, in the U.S., any crackpot can file a lawsuit. The reason the courts are blocking these lawsuits are because it's already been proven by law where he was born, when, etc. The courts are already so backed up that they aren't going to take on a case that could take up countless time that could actually be spent on real cases.

 

[eots]

if he was eligible for the presidency without question they would not be blocking lawsuits that are trying to prove this,,he was not born in Hawaii

See, in the U.S., any crackpot can file a lawsuit. The reason the courts are blocking these lawsuits are because it's already been proven by law where he was born, when, etc. The courts are already so backed up that they aren't going to take on a case that could take up countless time that could actually be spent on real cases.

and thats how easy it is to silence the bots...carry on

 

[Chimera]

yurt, it is not called a Birth Certification either... It is called:

State of Hawaii
Certification of Live Birth

Why not sue the State of Hawaii, If you do not accept what they deem their legal Certification of Birth?

yeah, you see how much i am distracted by this....

thank you for setting willy straight that it is not a birth certificate....

um, people have sued to get a copy and they have all lost due to standing...the law is clear on who has a right to see a copy of the original, a court of law could order it say in a paternity suit, will dispute etc....but so far every judge has denied standing or some apparently have simply thrown it out as frivolous which is absurd, because without a copy of the original, how can any judge say it is frivolous. to get frivolous you have to look at ALL the evidence and then determine that with ALL the evidence the claim lacks any merit.

since no judge has produced a copy of the original, denial is wholly improper.

It is what Hawaii deems as their legal birth certification, equal to a birth certificate for most all cases, where one is legally needed.

Does the constitution say anything at all about whether a State uses a Certification of Live Birth or a Birth Certification as the legal proof of citizenship for the presidency?

Care

I was born in NJ, and I am looking at my BC right now. It says: "Certificate of Live Birth."

 

[Yurt]

yurt, it is not called a Birth Certification either... It is called:

State of Hawaii
Certification of Live Birth

Why not sue the State of Hawaii, If you do not accept what they deem their legal Certification of Birth?

yeah, you see how much i am distracted by this....

thank you for setting willy straight that it is not a birth certificate....

um, people have sued to get a copy and they have all lost due to standing...the law is clear on who has a right to see a copy of the original, a court of law could order it say in a paternity suit, will dispute etc....but so far every judge has denied standing or some apparently have simply thrown it out as frivolous which is absurd, because without a copy of the original, how can any judge say it is frivolous. to get frivolous you have to look at ALL the evidence and then determine that with ALL the evidence the claim lacks any merit.

since no judge has produced a copy of the original, denial is wholly improper.

It is what Hawaii deems as their legal birth certification, equal to a birth certificate for most all cases, where one is legally needed.

Does the constitution say anything at all about whether a State uses a Certification of Live Birth or a Birth Certification as the legal proof of citizenship for the presidency?

Care

care,

i've already given you the specific HI codes that say it is not. i'm not doing it again. look up the HI codes yourself....it is not the same thing at all. that is why it says it is only prima facie evidence....that means it is not absolute proof, we've been through this and i'm not doing your homework for you again.

no the constitution does not, that is irrelevent to the discussion of whether obama is qualified or not. for the umpteenth time, people claim that the original will show something nefarious. as such, the prima facie certificate is NO longer proof care, i've also defined prima facie for you.

as to whether the government vetted him, give me a break, the government has been incompetent in so many other areas i would not dare assume the government is competent here.

the fact is people, what obama showed is not a copy of the original, it does not contain all the information, it is only prima facie evidence and if the original exists that is the proof under HI codes.

i suggest you guys stop being so partisan and blindly defending obama and look up the law, HI codes are posted online.

 

[geauxtohell]

amazing...you seem to think if you say it enough it makes it true.....

obama is not american

palin is smart...

too bad it doesnt work that way

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”

- Joseph Goebbels

 

[Care4all]

yeah, you see how much i am distracted by this....

thank you for setting willy straight that it is not a birth certificate....

um, people have sued to get a copy and they have all lost due to standing...the law is clear on who has a right to see a copy of the original, a court of law could order it say in a paternity suit, will dispute etc....but so far every judge has denied standing or some apparently have simply thrown it out as frivolous which is absurd, because without a copy of the original, how can any judge say it is frivolous. to get frivolous you have to look at ALL the evidence and then determine that with ALL the evidence the claim lacks any merit.

since no judge has produced a copy of the original, denial is wholly improper.

It is what Hawaii deems as their legal birth certification, equal to a birth certificate for most all cases, where one is legally needed.

Does the constitution say anything at all about whether a State uses a Certification of Live Birth or a Birth Certification as the legal proof of citizenship for the presidency?

Care

care,

i've already given you the specific HI codes that say it is not. i'm not doing it again. look up the HI codes yourself....it is not the same thing at all. that is why it says it is only prima facie evidence....that means it is not absolute proof, we've been through this and i'm not doing your homework for you again.

no the constitution does not, that is irrelevent to the discussion of whether obama is qualified or not. for the umpteenth time, people claim that the original will show something nefarious. as such, the prima facie certificate is NO longer proof care, i've also defined prima facie for you.

as to whether the government vetted him, give me a break, the government has been incompetent in so many other areas i would not dare assume the government is competent here.

the fact is people, what obama showed is not a copy of the original, it does not contain all the information, it is only prima facie evidence and if the original exists that is the proof under HI codes.

i suggest you guys stop being so partisan and blindly defending obama and look up the law, HI codes are posted online.

Yurt, HOW HAS people shown obama's Certification of live birth, nefarious? HOW? They haven't, thus the frivolous mention by several of the courts imo...

so no need to insist on an original....if you can show us how obama's Certification of Birth was nefarious then maybe they would have a case to insist on seeing the original, no?

 

[geauxtohell]

What courts, you blithering nitwit? What the hell do the courts have to do with anything? They don't bring charges or demand proof. A case has to come before them.

Good grief.

You mean other than enforce the laws of our land?

Nothing.

 

[Yurt]

It is what Hawaii deems as their legal birth certification, equal to a birth certificate for most all cases, where one is legally needed.

Does the constitution say anything at all about whether a State uses a Certification of Live Birth or a Birth Certification as the legal proof of citizenship for the presidency?

Care

care,

i've already given you the specific HI codes that say it is not. i'm not doing it again. look up the HI codes yourself....it is not the same thing at all. that is why it says it is only prima facie evidence....that means it is not absolute proof, we've been through this and i'm not doing your homework for you again.

no the constitution does not, that is irrelevent to the discussion of whether obama is qualified or not. for the umpteenth time, people claim that the original will show something nefarious. as such, the prima facie certificate is NO longer proof care, i've also defined prima facie for you.

as to whether the government vetted him, give me a break, the government has been incompetent in so many other areas i would not dare assume the government is competent here.

the fact is people, what obama showed is not a copy of the original, it does not contain all the information, it is only prima facie evidence and if the original exists that is the proof under HI codes.

i suggest you guys stop being so partisan and blindly defending obama and look up the law, HI codes are posted online.

Yurt, HOW HAS people shown obama's Certification of live birth, nefarious? HOW? They haven't, thus the frivious mention by several of the courts imo...

so no need to insist on an original....if you can show us how obama's Certification of Birth was nefarious then maybe they would have a case to insist on seeing the original, no?

care,

they have not been given access in order to show it. there are questions about which hospital, inconsistencies are what i believe they claim. how can they show anything when they can't see a copy of the certificate of live birth care?

the certification of live birth only gives partial information, that is why it is not titled the same. if there is nothing to hide care, what harm is there in releasing a copy? if obama doesn't want to waste court time, release a copy like mccain did and shut everyone up. the majority of people that have a problem with this is due solely to the fact he won't release a copy of original. i've been pos repped numerous times by people in this threads and every single one of them is about the original.

it begs the question that HI states it exists, yet he won't release it. look at the energy you're spending arguing its frivolous when you don't even know what all is contained the original.

 

[Care4all]

care,

i've already given you the specific HI codes that say it is not. i'm not doing it again. look up the HI codes yourself....it is not the same thing at all. that is why it says it is only prima facie evidence....that means it is not absolute proof, we've been through this and i'm not doing your homework for you again.

no the constitution does not, that is irrelevent to the discussion of whether obama is qualified or not. for the umpteenth time, people claim that the original will show something nefarious. as such, the prima facie certificate is NO longer proof care, i've also defined prima facie for you.

as to whether the government vetted him, give me a break, the government has been incompetent in so many other areas i would not dare assume the government is competent here.

the fact is people, what obama showed is not a copy of the original, it does not contain all the information, it is only prima facie evidence and if the original exists that is the proof under HI codes.

i suggest you guys stop being so partisan and blindly defending obama and look up the law, HI codes are posted online.

Yurt, HOW HAS people shown obama's Certification of live birth, nefarious? HOW? They haven't, thus the frivious mention by several of the courts imo...

so no need to insist on an original....if you can show us how obama's Certification of Birth was nefarious then maybe they would have a case to insist on seeing the original, no?

care,

they have not been given access in order to show it. there are questions about which hospital, inconsistencies are what i believe they claim. how can they show anything when they can't see a copy of the certificate of live birth care?

the certification of live birth only gives partial information, that is why it is not titled the same. if there is nothing to hide care, what harm is there in releasing a copy? if obama doesn't want to waste court time, release a copy like mccain did and shut everyone up. the majority of people that have a problem with this is due solely to the fact he won't release a copy of original. i've been pos repped numerous times by people in this threads and every single one of them is about the original.

it begs the question that HI states it exists, yet he won't release it. look at the energy you're spending arguing its frivolous when you don't even know what all is contained the original.

YURT,

whether Obama was born in Kenya or timbuktu he is a natural born citizen, of the United States....you realize such, don't you?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/general-discussion/81295-usa-citizenship-laws-history-vs-obama.html

 

[geauxtohell]

and thats how easy it is to silence the bots...carry on

You know, something doesn't gain virture simply because it is a conspiracy thoery.

And if you buy into every conspiracy theory, it doesn't put you "in the know", it just makes you paranoid.

My point: calling a person a "bot" simply, because they apply the rational person filter doesn't buy you any cool points.