Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On October 7, 2008, Corsi and his media consultant Tim Bueler were detained by immigration authorities in Kenya while doing further research related to the book, allegedly for failure to have a work permit. Corsi had scheduled a press conference to announce new research proving that as Senator Obama had raised a million dollars for the election campaign of Kenyan prime minister Raila Odinga, and had helped run Odinga's campaign as a strategist, including setting the stage for the campaign of violence and bloodshed that had brought Odinga to power after a disputed election. The meeting was interrupted by Kenyan immigration officials when they detained Corsi.[59][60] Corsi was eventually deported, [61] [62]
Well, according to your own accounts, and your willingness to agree with Snopes, it is time to lay this matter to rest. It appears that Obama was indeed born in Hawaii. The exact hospital may be in question but they seem to agree he was born in Hawaii. I'm not an Obama fan, but it appears to me that this case is closed.
Stand up and salute the President of the United States, Barak Hussein Obama.
That is your president Pale. You should respect him as such. Or are you some sort of traitor?
more meadowmuffins from sweet willy....they found NO STANDING
they did not rule or decide anything on the merits, they said citizens lack standing to bring a claim, not because they believe anything about obama
No, that's not the only finding. Another one was tossed and thoroughly trounced by the judge as utterly frivilous and a waste of the courts time. Nothing about standing, nothing about procedure, just a whole lot about STUPID. In fact, after dismissing the case as frivilous, he demanded the plantiffs attorney's return and explain why they shouldn't have to pay Obama's attorneys.
Judge Assails Lawsuit Questioning Obama CitizenshipWASHINGTON - A federal judge today threw out a lawsuit questioning President Barack Obama's citizenship, lambasting the case as a waste of the court's time and suggesting the plaintiff's attorney may have to compensate the president's lawyer.
"This case, if it were allowed to proceed, would deserve mention in one of those books that seek to prove that the law is foolish or that America has too many lawyers with not enough to do," U.S. District Judge James Robertson said in his written opinion.
The case was tossed because it was foolish, dumb ass.
Does anyone have the constitutional requirement about which hospital you are born in? I had it here somewhere but seems to have been lost.
BC says he was born in Hawaii.
End of stroy.
In response last summer, Obama's campaign posted his Hawaiian birth certificate
Robertson ordered plaintiff's attorney John Hemenway of Colorado Springs, Colo., to show why he hasn't violated court rules barring frivolous and harassing cases and shouldn't have to pay Obama's attorney, Bob Bauer, for his time arguing that the case should be thrown ou
LMAO....sweet willy's link contains a big fat lie:
In response last summer, Obama's campaign posted his Hawaiian birth certificate
face the facts, no court has ever heard the case on the merits, merely give perfunctory opinions based not on all the evidence, but on some evidence. it is the height of anti americanism to not allow people to demand proof, the best evidence of a president's constitutional eligibility.....
Plaintiff having invoked both diversity and the federal
interpleader statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1355, I do have jurisdiction.
Because plaintiffs only claim invokes the interpleader statute,
however, the suit must be dismissed for failure to state a claim.
I have already called the interpleader claim
frivolous in two interlocutory rulings [#10 and #14], and I do
so again here.
Because it
appears that the complaint in this case may have been presented
for an improper purpose such as to harass; and that the
interpleader claims and other legal contentions of plaintiff are
not warranted by existing law or by non-frivolous arguments for
extending, modifying or reversing existing law or for
establishing new law, the accompanying order of dismissal
requires Mr. Hemenway to show cause why he has not violated Rules
11(b)(1) and 11(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
and why he should not be required to pay reasonable attorneys
fees and other expenses to counsel for the defendants.
JAMES ROBERTSON
United States District Judge
LMAO....sweet willy's link contains a big fat lie:
In response last summer, Obama's campaign posted his Hawaiian birth certificate
face the facts, no court has ever heard the case on the merits, merely give perfunctory opinions based not on all the evidence, but on some evidence. it is the height of anti americanism to not allow people to demand proof, the best evidence of a president's constitutional eligibility.....
There is no lie. His BC was posted, is posted, you can find it anywhere.
The case has been rejected for being frivilous.
Your claims are frivilous. It is not reasonable to suspect that the Hawaiian BC, the same BC that is acceptable as proof of US birth for any purpose, is not adequate to prove his place of birth.
The Health Department in Hawaii has repeatedly verified that the BC is a true reflection of the original.
You Fail.
Wow! It must be so sad to be you.
You must be so disappointed that the republican party is so stupid as to let Obama be President. You must be so disappointed that the Clinton campaign let Obama win the nomination.
You cannot honestly believe that these people would allow someone you think is not a natural born citizen serve in the White House.
Give it a rest.
Are you stupid or crazy or just want attention?
If he was not a citizen, more powerful people then you would have stopped him. Look at the court battle for the White House in 2000. Look at the court battle between Coleman and Franken.
Don't you think that John McCain or Hillary Clinton would have been in court for either the nomination or the election.
Barack Obama is a citizen, born in Hawaii, and, as much as you don't like it, the President of the United States.
Now, put your tin foil hat back on before you get a clue.
Oh, World Net Daily is reliable and unbiased ... NOT.Lies and deceit ALWAYS unravel in time, just as this is...
Obama Birth Mystery: More Than 1 Hospital
Myth-busting website, news articles say president not born in location he claims
By Joe Kovacs and Jerome Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
More than eight months after Barack Obama was elected president, the mystery surrounding his precise birthplace is deepening as the myth-busting website Snopes.com – along with several news agencies and an Obama community blog – directly contradict the president's own claim regarding the hospital in which he was born.
In an official letter signed by Obama on White House stationery, the president celebrates his birth at the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii. The facility has posted that letter on its website, along with video of the letter being read in public.
But according to Snopes, the popular online hoax-buster that many rely on as the final word on both important and frivolous stories, Obama was born at a different hospital in the Hawaiian capital.
In Snopes' entry concerning allegations that Obama is a "radical Muslim," the site addresses the birth history of the commander in chief, stating, "Barack Hussein Obama was born on 4 August 1961 at the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii."
WND took a screen shot of the entry and highlighted the name of the hospital.
In this screenshot of Snopes.com highlighted by WND, the myth-busting website asserts President Obama was born at the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, not the Kapi'olani Medical Center in which Obama claims to have been born.
(Note: Within 90 minutes of this WND story being posted, Snopes swapped the hospital of birth to indicate Obama was born at Kapi'olani, but noted some ambiguity by stating, "News accounts have also variously placed his birth as having occurred at Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii.")
Interestingly, in Snopes' entry focusing on the natural-born citizenship controversy, no mention is made of the birth hospital.
But Snopes is not alone in asserting Obama was born at a hospital other than the one he personally claims.
A number of news articles published both in the U.S. and abroad name Queen's Medical Center – not Kapi'olani – as the correct birthplace.
A United Press International report from Nov. 4 states:
"Obama described his birth at Queen's Medical Center in Hawaii Aug. 4, 1961, to a young white woman from Kansas and a father of Luo ethnicity from Nyanza Province in Kenya, as an 'all-America' story transcending orthodox racial stereotypes and experience."
A November 2004 report from the Rainbow Edition News Letter, published by the Education Laboratory School in Hawaii, noted in its lead sentence:
"Barack Obama was born on August 4, 1961 at the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii."
There's more, MUCH more, for any rational person that can see that not only Snopes.com has lost it's credibility by lying for obama, but many people are trying to sweep this issue under the rug, but they're NOT being successful. Obama is hiding a multitude of his documents, B.C., passport, college transcripts, school enrollments, and more.... why? Lies have a way of coming back to bite you in the ass, and now obama lying about where he was born IS biting him in the ass. Here is COLD, HARD, PROOF, and it is NOT a CONSPIRACY... Obama birth mystery: More than 1 hospital
LMAO....sweet willy's link contains a big fat lie:
face the facts, no court has ever heard the case on the merits, merely give perfunctory opinions based not on all the evidence, but on some evidence. it is the height of anti americanism to not allow people to demand proof, the best evidence of a president's constitutional eligibility.....
There is no lie. His BC was posted, is posted, you can find it anywhere.
The case has been rejected for being frivilous.
Your claims are frivilous. It is not reasonable to suspect that the Hawaiian BC, the same BC that is acceptable as proof of US birth for any purpose, is not adequate to prove his place of birth.
The Health Department in Hawaii has repeatedly verified that the BC is a true reflection of the original.
You Fail.
why is it called a birth certifiCATION....it is NOT a certifiCATE...and youre lying that they said it was a "true reflection of the original" flat out lying....they never said that, a true relfection would be a copy moron
why bother, you're lying outright
Yurt,i've posted links and cases regarding standing....and YES, scotus would take the case to declare citizens do not have standing....
your arguments as to why anyone else doesn't bring the claim is a red herring, we are talking about citizens having the right to demand proof.
