House Democrats Vote To Undermine USSC, Violate Separation of Powers

Yes so you can ask them any question and everything could become before the court.

So how are you confirming advising or consenting to then?

I've addressed this many times already. If you are unable to understand, so be it.
 
Well the law says that the president gets to nominate and the senate must have a confirmation hearing on that nomination. Correct?
He said that's correct. But that did t happen under Obama. The senate refused to hold a confir action hearing for Obama. Stealing a Supreme Court seat.
 
So under the McConnell rule the Democrat only need to win the senate and say that the american people need to decide in the next election when a republican president nominates a Supreme. And not have a confirmation hearing at all.
 
Because Obama was too lazy to fight for it and he wrongly assumed Hilary would win. What happened there was absolutely wrong and as we found out, incredibly hypocritical.
Yes it was. Just line letting Senator believe you thought Roe was precedents.
 
So under the McConnell rule the Democrat only need to win the senate and say that the american people need to decide in the next election when a republican president nominates a Supreme. And not have a confirmation hearing at all.

If I was a Democrat and held the Senate, that is exactly what I would do.
 
Then vote no.
As should have happened...but these Justices lied so that relevant Senators (Collins and Murkowski) cold pretend that they weren't already predetermined to over turn Roe
 
As should have happened...but these Justices lied so that relevant Senators (Collins and Murkowski) cold pretend that they weren't already predetermined to over turn Roe

They get confirmed even without those votes.

Win elections.
 
Likely they don't actually

What was the vote count on their confirmations again?

No matter what the Republicans nominate him or someone just like him unless the (D)'s win elections.
 
Didn't work that way with Gorsuch or Barret did it?

Yes. With Supreme Court justices you have to have the White House AND the Senate now. The bar once was set higher than that but you can thank Harry Reid for undermining that.
 
Yes. With Supreme Court justices you have to have the White House AND the Senate now. The bar once was set higher than that but you can thank Harry Reid for undermining that.
Bullshit. That's McConnell from start to finish
 

Forum List

Back
Top