Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?What was there to examine? What did they test for? There was never a doubt as to who the victim was and who the shooter was. What to examine? All they did was take the word of a cop over a silent dead man, and through out the witnesses that differed from the cops account of what happened. Where's the dead man's side to test and examine?Good Lord
More than one autopsy was performed. What science? All in agreement and all backed up Wilsons story. None of them backing up the stories of those witnesses that you put you're faith in.
This administration put its nose somewhere that it didn't belong. It had every resource available to produce a finding that would back up their original opinion but could not.
The power and money of the United State Justice department found that the shooting was as reported by Wilson, and yet this is not good enough for the few.
There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
What rest of the evidence besides the story of the cop that did the shooting? And, who's to say that MB's blood inside the patrol car wasn't there due to the cops injuring the victim? It's very possible that the cop grabbed MB, causing him to bleed. He could've been scratched by the cop. There are other explanations besides the cop's side of the story. Again, what other evidence are you talking about here? Please explain. Thanks.No, I'm NOT black. The reports show the results of the shooting, nothing more. The reports show distance, entry and exit wounds, and possible angle and position of both parties. The reports do not show cause, circumstance, words spoken, whether an attack was threatened, whether an actual "charge" was in progress, nor if any other means could've been used to control the situation. Witnesses were cherry picked. Some witnesses lied. Some witnesses were ignored. There was no video. The cop's word is the only actual account to be examined.There was nothing to back up. There was nothing to examine. There were no opposing sides to dispute. There was nothing to say that the only account given wasn't correct. They had nothing to look for other than cause of death and the number of injuries. What else do you believe they were looking for in the examines?FYI - I did NOT have any witnesses. And, of course everything supported the cops side. His was the only side given. The other side was dead and couldn't give an account to examine. Yes, one law enforcement agency investigating another law enforcement agency will produce the truth every single time, you think?
So now you want to ignore the multiple autopsy results that back up Wilsons side?
What do you mean there was nothing to back up?
The autopsy results supported Wilsons testimony and shot down those so called witnesses who said MB had his hands up and that he was shot in the back.
They also showed MB was shot at very close range supporting Wilsons claim that MB went for his gun.
Your claim that this proves nothing pure idiocy.
Do you happen to be black by any chance?
So why was MBs blood found inside of Wilsons Patrol vehicle?
You keep trying to claim the autopsy results dont tell us anything which is complete bullshit when you combine it with the rest of forensic evidence.
Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?What was there to examine? What did they test for? There was never a doubt as to who the victim was and who the shooter was. What to examine? All they did was take the word of a cop over a silent dead man, and through out the witnesses that differed from the cops account of what happened. Where's the dead man's side to test and examine?
There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?What was there to examine? What did they test for? There was never a doubt as to who the victim was and who the shooter was. What to examine? All they did was take the word of a cop over a silent dead man, and through out the witnesses that differed from the cops account of what happened. Where's the dead man's side to test and examine?What science? What technology? What forensics? It was only gun shots and witnesses. No video of the actually shooting, no dispute as to who the victim was and who the shooters was. And, no, I do NOT trust any government agency. Even the FBI DNA lab has been wrong before.Of course only one side can.
What is amazing is that you seem to discount a governmental agency with experts that have studied forensics.
That agency has state of the art technology and science. All that backed up the evidence of several autopsies that all backed up wilsons account.
And the only argument is. You don't trust the man?
Good Lord
More than one autopsy was performed. What science? All in agreement and all backed up Wilsons story. None of them backing up the stories of those witnesses that you put you're faith in.
This administration put its nose somewhere that it didn't belong. It had every resource available to produce a finding that would back up their original opinion but could not.
The power and money of the United State Justice department found that the shooting was as reported by Wilson, and yet this is not good enough for the few.
There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
"How are cops supposed to know if their attacker is armed or not?"
How are cops supposed to tell the difference between a "good guy" with a gun and "bad guy" with a gun. So far, they have shot and killed a lot of innocent people and there's no sign of that lessening.
Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?What was there to examine? What did they test for? There was never a doubt as to who the victim was and who the shooter was. What to examine? All they did was take the word of a cop over a silent dead man, and through out the witnesses that differed from the cops account of what happened. Where's the dead man's side to test and examine?What science? What technology? What forensics? It was only gun shots and witnesses. No video of the actually shooting, no dispute as to who the victim was and who the shooters was. And, no, I do NOT trust any government agency. Even the FBI DNA lab has been wrong before.
Good Lord
More than one autopsy was performed. What science? All in agreement and all backed up Wilsons story. None of them backing up the stories of those witnesses that you put you're faith in.
This administration put its nose somewhere that it didn't belong. It had every resource available to produce a finding that would back up their original opinion but could not.
The power and money of the United State Justice department found that the shooting was as reported by Wilson, and yet this is not good enough for the few.
There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Argh, the wounds tell the position of the body when shot. Only one set of stories do the wounds back up, and that is Wilsons and the witnesses that back his side of the story.
I an NOT defending Mr. Brown. I am speaking about what has become the norm on Main Street America. Mr. Brown just happens to be the subject of this conversation, but it could be about the many others that make daily headlines all across this nation. I could be talking about the 12 year old boy shot while playing in the park, or the homeless man surrounded by 5 or 6 cops and shot while on the ground, or the toddler accidentally shot while a cop was shooting at someone else, or the 92 year old lady in Lithia Springs Georgia, or the many others that make daily headlines. These cases are becoming the norm on Main Street America. Something needs to be done about trigger happy cops with a free pass to kill anyone they feel like killing.Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?
Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
Why are you defending a POS like Brown?
Robbery doesn't mean immediate execution without a trial. And, no weapon was used when he took the cigars from the store. So, now we're allowing cops to be judge, jury, and executioners? Robbery suspects, especially unarmed robbery suspects, should get a trial before sentencing, and not immediately executed.Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?
Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
The stupid MFer just committed a strong arm robbery and you want to give him the benefit of the doubt?
Jesus Christ you're thick headed.
I an NOT defending Mr. Brown. I am speaking about what has become the norm on Main Street America. Mr. Brown just happens to be the subject of this conversation, but it could be about the many others that make daily headlines all across this nation. I could be talking about the 12 year old boy shot while playing in the park, or the homeless man surrounded by 5 or 6 cops and shot while on the ground, or the toddler accidentally shot while a cop was shooting at someone else, or the 92 year old lady in Lithia Springs Georgia, or the many others that make daily headlines. These cases are becoming the norm on Main Street America. Something needs to be done about trigger happy cops with a free pass to kill anyone they feel like killing.Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
Why are you defending a POS like Brown?
And, what's even worse, is the fact that cops investigate cops. Go figure. And, all that's needed to get a free pass is the words, "I feared for my safety", or "He reach for his waist band". Right or wrong?
Yep, correct. The other witness is dead and can't explain the position of the body, nor the exact circumstance surrounding the last few seconds that took place. And, the only witnesses that were considered were the ones supporting the cops. The others were considered to ne liars and dismissed.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?What was there to examine? What did they test for? There was never a doubt as to who the victim was and who the shooter was. What to examine? All they did was take the word of a cop over a silent dead man, and through out the witnesses that differed from the cops account of what happened. Where's the dead man's side to test and examine?What science? What technology? What forensics? It was only gun shots and witnesses. No video of the actually shooting, no dispute as to who the victim was and who the shooters was. And, no, I do NOT trust any government agency. Even the FBI DNA lab has been wrong before.
Good Lord
More than one autopsy was performed. What science? All in agreement and all backed up Wilsons story. None of them backing up the stories of those witnesses that you put you're faith in.
This administration put its nose somewhere that it didn't belong. It had every resource available to produce a finding that would back up their original opinion but could not.
The power and money of the United State Justice department found that the shooting was as reported by Wilson, and yet this is not good enough for the few.
There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Argh, the wounds tell the position of the body when shot. Only one set of stories do the wounds back up, and that is Wilsons and the witnesses that back his side of the story.
I an NOT defending Mr. Brown. I am speaking about what has become the norm on Main Street America. Mr. Brown just happens to be the subject of this conversation, but it could be about the many others that make daily headlines all across this nation. I could be talking about the 12 year old boy shot while playing in the park, or the homeless man surrounded by 5 or 6 cops and shot while on the ground, or the toddler accidentally shot while a cop was shooting at someone else, or the 92 year old lady in Lithia Springs Georgia, or the many others that make daily headlines. These cases are becoming the norm on Main Street America. Something needs to be done about trigger happy cops with a free pass to kill anyone they feel like killing.Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
Why are you defending a POS like Brown?
And, what's even worse, is the fact that cops investigate cops. Go figure. And, all that's needed to get a free pass is the words, "I feared for my safety", or "He reach for his waist band". Right or wrong?
Robbery doesn't mean immediate execution without a trial. And, no weapon was used when he took the cigars from the store. So, now we're allowing cops to be judge, jury, and executioners? Robbery suspects, especially unarmed robbery suspects, should get a trial before sentencing, and not immediately executed.Nice guess. Could it have also been because the victim was doubling over in pain from previous gun shots? Could it have been because the victim was already on his way down when the shot was fired? Was there anyone else that watching that can verify what happened? And, of those watching, which ones were actually believed and included in the final examination and report? How many witnesses were dismissed as liars? How many witnesses that were pro-cop, were actually believed and taken as true accounts of the event? How many witnesses that were not pro-cop, were considered to be unreliable witnesses, liars, and dismissed? Do you have all of those facts handy? Can you answer all of those questions with actual knowledge and supporting data? Or, are you just another pro-cop citizen defending the murder of an unarmed citizen? Which is it?Why? Do tell your version. Could it be because he was bent over, on his way down to the pavement after receiving other gun shots? Could it be the results od extreme pain caused by previous gun shots? You tell me what you know for a fact, to be fact and not opinion.Do you understand why MB received a GSW to the top of his head?
It's because MB was falling forward as Wilson shot for center mass,indicating MB was moving towards Wilson and his momentum caused him to fall forwards rather than backwards thus exposing the top of his head to gunfire as he fell.
The stupid MFer just committed a strong arm robbery and you want to give him the benefit of the doubt?
Jesus Christ you're thick headed.
Yep, correct. The other witness is dead and can't explain the position of the body, nor the exact circumstance surrounding the last few seconds that took place. And, the only witnesses that were considered were the ones supporting the cops. The others were considered to ne liars and dismissed.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?What was there to examine? What did they test for? There was never a doubt as to who the victim was and who the shooter was. What to examine? All they did was take the word of a cop over a silent dead man, and through out the witnesses that differed from the cops account of what happened. Where's the dead man's side to test and examine?Good Lord
More than one autopsy was performed. What science? All in agreement and all backed up Wilsons story. None of them backing up the stories of those witnesses that you put you're faith in.
This administration put its nose somewhere that it didn't belong. It had every resource available to produce a finding that would back up their original opinion but could not.
The power and money of the United State Justice department found that the shooting was as reported by Wilson, and yet this is not good enough for the few.
There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Argh, the wounds tell the position of the body when shot. Only one set of stories do the wounds back up, and that is Wilsons and the witnesses that back his side of the story.
[
I an NOT defending Mr. Brown. I am speaking about what has become the norm on Main Street America. Mr. Brown just happens to be the subject of this conversation, but it could be about the many others that make daily headlines all across this nation. I could be talking about the 12 year old boy shot while playing in the park, or the homeless man surrounded by 5 or 6 cops and shot while on the ground, or the toddler accidentally shot while a cop was shooting at someone else, or the 92 year old lady in Lithia Springs Georgia, or the many others that make daily headlines. These cases are becoming the norm on Main Street America. Something needs to be done about trigger happy cops with a free pass to kill anyone they feel like killing.
And, what's even worse, is the fact that cops investigate cops. Go figure. And, all that's needed to get a free pass is the words, "I feared for my safety", or "He reach for his waist band". Right or wrong?
He was guilty of robbery, and should have been given his day in court. He stole cigars and should've been punished for what he did. But, robbery doesn't carry an immediate death sentence carried out by a cop within minutes of the robbery. We have a court system that punishes crime, including robbery. The cop played judge, jury, and executioner within minutes of the robbery. Do we allow cops to be judge, jury, and executioner each time the law is broken?"How are cops supposed to know if their attacker is armed or not?"
How are cops supposed to tell the difference between a "good guy" with a gun and "bad guy" with a gun. So far, they have shot and killed a lot of innocent people and there's no sign of that lessening.
So MB was innocent?
And the bad guy is usually pretty easy to spot,he'll be the one running away or shooting at the cops.
The cops didnt appear to have any problem whatsoever deciding who was the criminal here.
Crazy Woman Pulls Out A Gun During A Fight Inside Restaurant Threatens To Shoot New Video
He was guilty of robbery, and should have been given his day in court. He stole cigars and should've been punished for what he did. But, robbery doesn't carry an immediate death sentence carried out by a cop within minutes of the robbery. We have a court system that punishes crime, including robbery. The cop played judge, jury, and executioner within minutes of the robbery. Do we allow cops to be judge, jury, and executioner each time the law is broken?"How are cops supposed to know if their attacker is armed or not?"
How are cops supposed to tell the difference between a "good guy" with a gun and "bad guy" with a gun. So far, they have shot and killed a lot of innocent people and there's no sign of that lessening.
So MB was innocent?
And the bad guy is usually pretty easy to spot,he'll be the one running away or shooting at the cops.
The cops didnt appear to have any problem whatsoever deciding who was the criminal here.
Crazy Woman Pulls Out A Gun During A Fight Inside Restaurant Threatens To Shoot New Video
What evidence showed that the two construction workers were lying? What evidence showed anyone lying? Remember, it was investigated by law enforcement, and not an independent outside source. Is it possible that law enforcement looks after their own? Has it ever happened before? Or, do you believe all law enforcement agencies are honest and above board? Do cops turn on cops as a normal occurrence? Have you ever heard of cops covering for other cops, or agencies covering for other agencies? And, who was there to deny what was accepted as evidence? The dead man couldn't dispute the events that lead up the shooting. So, naturally, the cops version was the only one carrying any weight in the matter. And, yes, witnesses were dismissed by the very law enforcement agency doing the investigating.Yep, correct. The other witness is dead and can't explain the position of the body, nor the exact circumstance surrounding the last few seconds that took place. And, the only witnesses that were considered were the ones supporting the cops. The others were considered to ne liars and dismissed.Entry and exist wounds do NOT tell the story of what happened. They only tell what happened during the actual firing of the weapon, nothing more. Those wounds tell what happened as the cop was shooting, nothing more. It doesn't tell the circumstances, the words spoken, the attitude of either party, the situation that caused it to occur, nor the actual threat, if there was one. Or, can you provide evidence to dispute that also?What was there to examine? What did they test for? There was never a doubt as to who the victim was and who the shooter was. What to examine? All they did was take the word of a cop over a silent dead man, and through out the witnesses that differed from the cops account of what happened. Where's the dead man's side to test and examine?
There was a body. The body, entrance and exit wounds would tell you which witness stories to believe and which to not.
Where's the mans side of the story? Had he submitted to a lawful order, he could tell it himself.
Argh, the wounds tell the position of the body when shot. Only one set of stories do the wounds back up, and that is Wilsons and the witnesses that back his side of the story.
Because the evidence showed they were lying. Derp.....
