Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
the answer is indisputable: the tax cuts did their intended job of returning money to taxpayers. The government took in less than it would have otherwise.
How do I know? Brian Riedl said so. Riedl found that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts were responsible for “just 14 percent of the swing from the projected cumulative $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002-2011 to an actual $6.1 trillion deficit.”
How much is just 14 percent? Riedl did the math so I don’t have to: $1.7 trillion. Throw in other tax costs -- primarily the annual patching of the Alternative Minimum Tax, made more expensive by the existence of the Bush tax cuts -- and you get another $400 billion. Throw in the extra interest payments caused by the increased debt -- a cost Riedl conveniently omitted -- and you have $377 billion more.
PostPartisan - Did the Bush tax cuts reduce revenue? Of course.
"Otherwise" is speculative bullshit for mental masturbators.
the answer is indisputable: the tax cuts did their intended job of returning money to taxpayers. The government took in less than it would have otherwise.
How do I know? Brian Riedl said so. Riedl found that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts were responsible for just 14 percent of the swing from the projected cumulative $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002-2011 to an actual $6.1 trillion deficit.
How much is just 14 percent? Riedl did the math so I dont have to: $1.7 trillion. Throw in other tax costs -- primarily the annual patching of the Alternative Minimum Tax, made more expensive by the existence of the Bush tax cuts -- and you get another $400 billion. Throw in the extra interest payments caused by the increased debt -- a cost Riedl conveniently omitted -- and you have $377 billion more.
PostPartisan - Did the Bush tax cuts reduce revenue? Of course.
"Otherwise" is speculative bullshit for mental masturbators.
Revere's bluff was called and his hand is empty. Remember that your mental masturbation, revere, just like your physical, is fun but sterile. You reactionary wacks have offered nothing of worth here. Just sterile thinking.
the answer is indisputable: the tax cuts did their intended job of returning money to taxpayers. The government took in less than it would have otherwise.
How do I know? Brian Riedl said so. Riedl found that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts were responsible for just 14 percent of the swing from the projected cumulative $5.6 trillion surplus for 2002-2011 to an actual $6.1 trillion deficit.
How much is just 14 percent? Riedl did the math so I dont have to: $1.7 trillion. Throw in other tax costs -- primarily the annual patching of the Alternative Minimum Tax, made more expensive by the existence of the Bush tax cuts -- and you get another $400 billion. Throw in the extra interest payments caused by the increased debt -- a cost Riedl conveniently omitted -- and you have $377 billion more.
PostPartisan - Did the Bush tax cuts reduce revenue? Of course.
"Otherwise" is speculative bullshit for mental masturbators.
You never read the article yet you lied and said you did. You keep shifting like sand. You're a troll.
and you suck at it.
PostPartisan - Did the Bush tax cuts reduce revenue? Of course.
Revere and Auto have added absolutely nothing to this discussion: mere spin, talking points, no substance, and a lot of misdirection. Guys, when you provide hard evidence, we can play hard ball. Right now Dante has smacked all of your pitches out of the park.
"Otherwise" is speculative bullshit for mental masturbators.
Revere's bluff was called and his hand is empty. Remember that your mental masturbation, revere, just like your physical, is fun but sterile. You reactionary wacks have offered nothing of worth here. Just sterile thinking.
No, I presented at least two "models" that failed. Obamacare and Porkulus.
What I want to know is when did preserving Liberty go out of vogue?
"Otherwise" is speculative bullshit for mental masturbators.
You never read the article yet you lied and said you did. You keep shifting like sand. You're a troll.
and you suck at it.
PostPartisan - Did the Bush tax cuts reduce revenue? Of course.
I read the article.
Models for a $14T economy as complex as this are crap.
You were helpless, we know, we tried to warn you that when you give Government to much power the only thing they can seem to deliver is higher taxes a bill giving them more power and an apology that they didnt have enough to get the job done the first, second and third time
grow up.
and then eat shit.
Uhh, ok... Awesome "comeback" dood. How about you realize you represent a dinosaur, outdated and failed version of how Governments role in people lives.
Nope, dishwater, your way is the outdated unacceptable model for the 21st century.
You presented nothing, revere, except your inability to reason and to evidence.
Dante is right: you are a troll.
You're done arguing the point, so it's time to attack?
Who's the troll?
You were helpless, we know, we tried to warn you that when you give Government to much power the only thing they can seem to deliver is higher taxes a bill giving them more power and an apology that they didn’t have “enough” to get the job done the first, second and third time…
You are not going to get the victories you believe, and next month will show that.
You guys are not, simply, mainstream.
You presented nothing, revere, except your inability to reason and to evidence.
Dante is right: you are a troll.
Uhh, ok... Awesome "comeback" dood. How about you realize you represent a dinosaur, outdated and failed version of how Governments role in people lives.
Nope, dishwater, your way is the outdated unacceptable model for the 21st century.
Show me where it "my way" has failed in history. Until then this diskwater killed yo shit clean bitch~
Uhh, ok... Awesome "comeback" dood. How about you realize you represent a dinosaur, outdated and failed version of how Governments role in people lives.
Nope, dishwater, your way is the outdated unacceptable model for the 21st century.
Show me where it "my way" has failed in history.
Nope, dishwater, your way is the outdated unacceptable model for the 21st century.
Show me where it "my way" has failed in history.
2000 - 20008 ring a bell?
gawd, you people are awful.
Nope, dishwater, your way is the outdated unacceptable model for the 21st century.
Show me where it "my way" has failed in history. Until then this diskwater killed yo shit clean bitch~
1994 - 2006 under one compliant and one eager president stripped the wealth of the middle class (the real economic strength of America), ran up the public debt by borrowing (and you yell at the Dems?), and damn near broke the economy.
Yep your "way" failed. Sneak off into the dark, little one.
