Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...As soon as Trump goes popping off and talking about meetings with Comey then Comey has the right to defend himself. Especially if Trump is lying about the communications as Comey claims... Plain and simpleIt was Comeys account of what he and trumped talk about which he made public after trump tweeted and spread "lies" in statements and interviews. THis work product line is weak and untrueDoesn't matter, it was work product and releasing it violated a nondisclosure agreement Comey signed.
.
Was Comey not communicating with the president as director of the FBI or not?
If the answer is yes, notes of that meeting ARE work product because he was working. Simple as that.
.
Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.
Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.
.
How do you know the FBI didn't authorize him? After all Trump treats them like shit so it wouldn't be surprising.have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...As soon as Trump goes popping off and talking about meetings with Comey then Comey has the right to defend himself. Especially if Trump is lying about the communications as Comey claims... Plain and simpleIt was Comeys account of what he and trumped talk about which he made public after trump tweeted and spread "lies" in statements and interviews. THis work product line is weak and untrue
Was Comey not communicating with the president as director of the FBI or not?
If the answer is yes, notes of that meeting ARE work product because he was working. Simple as that.
.
Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.
Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.
.
Read it for yourself.
3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.
https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf
.
How do you know the FBI didn't authorize him? After all Trump treats them like shit so it wouldn't be surprising.have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...As soon as Trump goes popping off and talking about meetings with Comey then Comey has the right to defend himself. Especially if Trump is lying about the communications as Comey claims... Plain and simpleWas Comey not communicating with the president as director of the FBI or not?
If the answer is yes, notes of that meeting ARE work product because he was working. Simple as that.
.
Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.
Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.
.
Read it for yourself.
3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.
https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf
.
So why hasn't he been charged with a crime?How do you know the FBI didn't authorize him? After all Trump treats them like shit so it wouldn't be surprising.have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...As soon as Trump goes popping off and talking about meetings with Comey then Comey has the right to defend himself. Especially if Trump is lying about the communications as Comey claims... Plain and simple
Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.
Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.
.
Read it for yourself.
3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.
https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf
.
Comeys boss was the Assistant AG. The approval would have to come from above, not an underling.
.
So why hasn't he been charged with a crime?How do you know the FBI didn't authorize him? After all Trump treats them like shit so it wouldn't be surprising.have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.
Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.
.
Read it for yourself.
3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.
https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf
.
Comeys boss was the Assistant AG. The approval would have to come from above, not an underling.
.
So they aren't charging him. Thanks for clearing that up.So why hasn't he been charged with a crime?How do you know the FBI didn't authorize him? After all Trump treats them like shit so it wouldn't be surprising.have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...
Read it for yourself.
3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.
https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf
.
Comeys boss was the Assistant AG. The approval would have to come from above, not an underling.
.
Ask the DOJ, they would be the ones handling it.
.
Sorry that's classified classifI would like to ask where did the Russian involvement in our election come from. The FBI never got to look at the DNC's computers or servers so how did they know the Russians were involved in the hacking since they never saw the democrats E-mails?
1. Directors in most all cases sign a different agreement than underlings, or an additional one...at least that's how it was at all corporations I worked for....so we need to find the nondisclosure agreement that department heads have to sign....have you read his nondisclosure agreement? Do you have a link for the nondisclosure agreement he signed as a Director? HINT-It would NOT be the same agreement as a director as the ones for employees...As soon as Trump goes popping off and talking about meetings with Comey then Comey has the right to defend himself. Especially if Trump is lying about the communications as Comey claims... Plain and simpleIt was Comeys account of what he and trumped talk about which he made public after trump tweeted and spread "lies" in statements and interviews. THis work product line is weak and untrue
Was Comey not communicating with the president as director of the FBI or not?
If the answer is yes, notes of that meeting ARE work product because he was working. Simple as that.
.
Yep, he could have called a press conference and told reporters his story. Evidently the boy ain't got the balls to stand up for himself as he demonstrated in his sworn testimony. He testified how easily he was stunned, surprised and confused.
Of course surreptitiously giving work product, created as an employee of the US, to a third party to release to the media, could be illegal. It definitely violates his nondisclosure agreement.
.
Read it for yourself.
3. I will not reveal, by any means, any information or material from or related to FBI files or any other information acquired by virtue of my official employment to any unauthorized recipient without prior official written authorization by the FBI.
https://cdnews-pull2-mvaqgu6sx.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/FD-291.pdf
.
Via a COPY of the hard drive....there is not just the one server/hard drive....copies are made to get multiple experts reviewing it at the same time...I would like to ask where did the Russian involvement in our election come from. The FBI never got to look at the DNC's computers or servers so how did they know the Russians were involved in the hacking since they never saw the democrats E-mails?
are the tapes Trump says hes releasing classified ?
Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....He has the power to declassify, if they are.
Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president.
Politifact
are the tapes Trump says hes releasing classified ?
Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....He has the power to declassify, if they are.
Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president.
Politifact
are the tapes Trump says hes releasing classified ?
They are authorized to declassify anything their own departments created and classified.
[
No, but I can say repugs are traitorous scum. Can you? You have already proven it. Follow the yellow brick road
The memo was not classified.
Didn't you hear the testimony?
HEY Mike Comey A private citizen and it was a message HE wrote and it wan't classified So how is that classified,,, What law did he break?
Via a COPY of the hard drive....there is not just the one server/hard drive....copies are made to get multiple experts reviewing it at the same time...I would like to ask where did the Russian involvement in our election come from. The FBI never got to look at the DNC's computers or servers so how did they know the Russians were involved in the hacking since they never saw the democrats E-mails?
Same with department heads such as Directors or Secretaries....He has the power to declassify, if they are.
Experts agreed that the president, as commander-in-chief, is ultimately responsible for classification and declassification. When someone lower in the chain of command handles classification and declassification duties -- which is usually how it’s done -- it’s because they have been delegated to do so by the president directly, or by an appointee chosen by the president.
Politifact
are the tapes Trump says hes releasing classified ?
They are authorized to declassify anything their own departments created and classified.
