🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

It isn't about how "hot is that", but rather the effects it causes. For you to continue saying/asking the same things over and over only goes to show that you refuse to open your mind and accept the fact that someone somewhere may know more about the subject than you seem to think you know. If you have a reputable source that can effectively argue against the fact that humans have caused climate change, then by all means, please share it with everyone. Keep in mind, though, that opinions are not facts.

The Sun literally makes our climate. It controls nearly all of climate. Need proof? Show me life on any other planet in the solar system.
 
And BOOM, there you go.

Alarmists are all about science, but they cherry pick science, lmfao
Posting a SurveyS of of ALL the Papers written over a given period (year/Years) is the OPPOSITE of "Cherry Picking" you MORON.
It's the "Consensus."
As is posting the opinion of every relevant Science Org or nationally and internationally: All believers in AGW.

OTOH, Two opponents on the last page posted a SINGLE Dissent to a Giant Consensus in each of the surveys of Thousands each.
THEY/YOU "Cherry Picked" just One each. ie, One was YOUR Youtube of just One/Happler.
IOW: Foxfyre 1 Cherry Pick, and you 1 Cherry Pick.
Me 10+ surveys of Thousands of Scientists/Scientific papers.


You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.

`
 
Last edited:
The Sun literally makes our Climate. It Controls nearly all of Climate. Need Proof? Show me Life on any other Planet in the solar system.
The Sun shines on ALL of this Solar systems planets BUT there's ONLY Life HERE because we have a significant (and conducive) ATMOSPHERE you IDIOT.
If we change it we could alter or lose that that life.
This planet did NOT have any life for app 2/3 of it's existence...
and YOU could Not have existed for longer than that because the Atmosphere was Hostile to human life.

You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.




Note:
I do Not respond to the ONE-LINE Trolls 'jc456,' ToddsterParrot, and Mod MisterBananaPeale.



`
 
Last edited:
Posting a SurveyS of of ALL the Papers written over a given period (year/Years) is the OPPOSITE of "Cherry Picking" you MORON.
It's the "Consensus."
As is posting the opinion of every relevant Science Org or nationally and internationally: All believers in AGW.

OTOH, Two opponents on the last page posted a SINGLE Dissent to a Giant Consensus in each of the surveys of Thousands each.
THEY/YOU "Cherry Picked" just One each. ie, One was YOUR Youtube of just One/Happler.
IOW: Foxfyre 1 Cherry Pick, and you 1 Cherry Pick.
Me 10+ surveys of Thousands.


You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.
You are TOO STUPID TO DEBATE.

`
For the umpteenth time, no consensus in science. Stop humiliating yourself
 
If we are, it’s 0.012% of co2. How hot is that?
Incorrect. This statement and the statement to which it is responding says that only 0.012% of atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic. If you meant something else, please try again.
 
Not really. Changes in pressure are what create wind.
Nope. I wish you warmers knew how this works so you’d all get bent.


The Sun Makes the Wind Blow
The energy in wind comes from the sun. When the sun shines, some of its light reaches the Earth’s surface. The Earth near the Equator receives more of the sun’s energy than the North and South Poles.
Some parts of the Earth absorb more solar energy than others. Some parts reflect more of the sun’s rays back into the air. Light-colored surfaces and water reflect more sunlight than dark surfaces. Snow and ice reflect sunlight, too.
Some types of land absorb more solar energy than others. Dark forests absorb sunlight, while light desert sands reflect it. Land areas usually absorb more energy than water in lakes and oceans.
 
Incorrect. This statement and the statement to which it is responding says that only 0.012% of atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic. If you meant something else, please try again.
No, that’s exactly what I said if your insanity was true. It isn’t true, but.012 is all the CO2 if so. Explain it different, I don’t think you can
 
Nope. I wish you warmers knew how this works so you’d all get bent.


The Sun Makes the Wind Blow
The energy in wind comes from the sun. When the sun shines, some of its light reaches the Earth’s surface. The Earth near the Equator receives more of the sun’s energy than the North and South Poles.
Some parts of the Earth absorb more solar energy than others. Some parts reflect more of the sun’s rays back into the air. Light-colored surfaces and water reflect more sunlight than dark surfaces. Snow and ice reflect sunlight, too.
Some types of land absorb more solar energy than others. Dark forests absorb sunlight, while light desert sands reflect it. Land areas usually absorb more energy than water in lakes and oceans.
Wind is a safe, clean, renewable energy source for making electricity.
 
For the purposes of Earth climate change, the Sun is a constant.

What causes Earth climate change is the positioning of land near the poles. And land moves...
The problem with the climate debacle is that scientists state co2, water vapour, methane, volcanoes, earthquakes, Milankovitch orbit cycles, the sun, sink holes, dust on ice, plate tectonics and so on and so all contributes to and determines/creates the earth's climate. Basically, the earth's climate is complicated.

But the alarmists just always swing round to, "It's mankind and co2, it's as simple as that".
 
The problem with the climate debacle is that scientists state co2, water vapour, methane, volcanoes, earthquakes, Milankovitch orbit cycles, the sun, sink holes, dust on ice, plate tectonics and so on and so all contributes to and determines/creates the earth's climate. Basically, the earth's climate is complicated.

But the alarmists just always swing round to, "It's mankind and co2, it's as simple as that".


90% of Earth ice on Antarctica
7% on Greenland

If Earth had two polar oceans it would have no ice....



R.2a3294ffeab2b7aaf47c6f7a80ae4810
 
90% of Earth ice on Antarctica
7% on Greenland

If Earth had two polar oceans it would have no ice....



R.2a3294ffeab2b7aaf47c6f7a80ae4810
Alarmists don't want Antarctica to be a temperate forest again, it ain't allowed because it will, allegedly, wipe mankind out.

 
Alarmists don't want Antarctica to be a temperate forest again, it ain't allowed because it will, allegedly, wipe mankind out.



Antarctica moved from South Africa to the South Pole during the past 130 million years. Its continent specific ice age started 40+ million years ago.

Greenland was all green 2 million years ago. North America was covered with ice age glacier down to Indiana 1 million years ago.

And that truth busts both Co2 and Sun as NOT THE CAUSE...

Greenland froze while North America thawed. Tectonic plate movement did that, not Sun or Co2....
 
[quote/]Grumblenuts, Wind is a safe, clean, renewable energy source for making electricity.[quote/]

not dependable is one issue, next is the ability to freeze, etc.,
 

Forum List

Back
Top