Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Do you or do you not believe those data to be accurate?
There are probably a dozen sites you can verify them with.
Do you reject all science that you, yourself have not performed?I have never performed that research myself. Don't see why it matters much.
What matters is that Co2 increased and the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE....
So, if you are practicing actual science, the theory that increased Co2 in the atmosphere causes warming would be
REJECTED
the warmed planet's land, water and air
ALL means of measuring temperature show an increase.
No, it is not. Your claims are false and I can show it.Massive falsehood.
False. Both have been warmng since the Industrial Revolution. Hundreds of thousands of measurements from all over the planet and from orbit above show it.Water and air not warming.
False.Land only warming in growing urban areas due to Urban Heat Sink Effect.
That is incorrect. The data show warming everywhere.FALSEHOOD
ALL FUDGED DATA SHOWS WARMING THAT DOES NOT EXIST IN THE RAW DATA
An excellent suggestionLEARN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FUDGE AND DATA
I am beginning to think that Abu Afak's contention that you are suffering some form of mental illness more and more likely.MAYBE MAYBE YOU WILL GET A CLUE IF YOU DO
www.nbcnews.com
Are you kidding? Go re-read the conclusions of your own linked article. "The atmosphere is indeed warming, not cooling as the data previously showed."DATA is from INSTRUMENTS
FUDGE is from LIARS who did not like the TRUTH of the DATA....
Exhibit A
Key claim against global warming evaporates
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
THE DATA
satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling
THE FUDGE
Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data.
No conflict of interest $$$$ there.... If they admit THE TRUTH of the DATA there would be no reason to continue to fund their FRAUD....
radiosonde instruments used in the 1970's were not as well shielded from sunlight as more recent models.
BULLSHIT EXCUSE TO FUDGE THE DATA AND KEEP BILKING THE TAXPAYER
Are you kidding? Go re-read the conclusions of your own linked article. "The atmosphere is indeed warming, not cooling as the data previously showed."
You know, somehow I don't think you're actually laughing that much.LOL!!!
Mountains of data from hundreds of different sources show it is warming.DATA shows NO WARMING
You are the one who has been lying.The most conflicted liars on the planet fudge the data.
Who do you believe is a "taxpayer funded shill" and why would that make their statements suspect?Taxpayer funded shill insists
Do you ever plan on actually joining the conversation here? I understand you have been booted from other forums. That suggests the possibility that you could be booted from this one. Try actually holding a conversation with someone here. It might help all around.ONLY FUDGE MATTERS
censor that DATA...
Mountains of data
The most prolific of liars in this neighborhood is you. That is the opinion of every single poster on this forum. No one believes you. That ought to mean something to you but I strongly suspect that it does not.Liar. You call FUDGE "data." Either you are too stupid to understand the difference, or you have no concern for truth, or both....
The most prolific of liars in this neighborhood is you. That is the opinion of every single poster on this forum. No one believes you. That ought to mean something to you but I strongly suspect that it does not.
We know that humans are causing global warming because multiple methods show that every scrap of the CO2 increase from pre-industrial levels came from the combustion of fossil fuels. We know that CO2 is the primary cause of the observed warming so, ipso facto, humans are causing climate change.
The most prolific of liars in this neighborhood is you. That is the opinion of every single poster on this forum. No one believes you. That ought to mean something to you but I strongly suspect that it does not.
We know that humans are causing global warming because multiple methods show that every scrap of the CO2 increase from pre-industrial levels came from the combustion of fossil fuels. We know that CO2 is the primary cause of the observed warming so, ipso facto, humans are causing climate change.
You've seen this before.We know that CO2 is the primary cause of the observed warming
So, 51%? More?
Post the math.......if you have it.
So what percentage of the atmosphere is co2?The most prolific of liars in this neighborhood is you. That is the opinion of every single poster on this forum. No one believes you. That ought to mean something to you but I strongly suspect that it does not.
We know that humans are causing global warming because multiple methods show that every scrap of the CO2 increase from pre-industrial levels came from the combustion of fossil fuels. We know that CO2 is the primary cause of the observed warming so, ipso facto, humans are causing climate change.
This has been asked and answered several times in the last couple days. Try to pay more attention. CO2 currently makes up 420 ppmV or 0.042% by volume. Exciting?So what percentage of the atmosphere is co2?
Isn't this kind of like asking how do you know hamsters are responsible for all the shit in their hamster cages?so many clowns, new and old here, say it's all natural
"it goes up, it goes down"
but scientists have actually looked into WHY this cycle is different than the others.
About 615,000,000 results (0.30 seconds)
Search Results
Web results
How We Know Today's Climate Change Is Not Natural
https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2017/04/.../how-we-know-climate-change-is-not-natural/Apr 4, 2017 - Last week, the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology, chaired by climate contrarian Lamar Smith, R-Texas, held a hearing on ...
How do we know global warming is not a natural cycle? | Climate ...
www.climatecentral.org/library/faqs/how_do_we_know_it_is_not_a_natural_cycleNov 7, 2009 - Answer. If the Earth's temperature had been steady for millions of years and only started rising in the past half century or so, the answer would ...
How do we know? - Evidence | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of ...
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. ...Not only was 2016 the warmest year on record, but eight of the 12 months that make up .... the Earth's natural greenhouse effect and suggested that slight changes in the ...
Human fingerprints on climate change rule out natural cycles
https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-natural-cycle.htmHowever, internal forces do not cause climate change. ... and oceanic emissions of CO2 and know that they are small compared to anthropogenic emissions, but ...
[.....]
How Do We Know Humans Are Causing Climate Change? | Climate ...
https://www.climaterealityproject.org/.../how-do-we-know-humans-are-causing-climat...Feb 1, 2019 - Yes, we know humans are responsible for the climate changewe see ... as if we're wrapping another, not-so-natural blanket around the Earth.
Global warming isn't just a natural cycle » Yale Climate Connections
https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/.../global-warming-isnt-just-a-natural-cycle/Sep 18, 2018 - Here's how we know that. ... Global warming isn't just anatural cycle. By Sara Peach on Sep ... The earth's temperature changesnaturally over time. Variations ... Earth's warming: How scientists know it'snot the sun. From Yale ...
How Do We Know that Humans Are the Major Cause of Global ...
https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/science.../human-contribution-to-gw-faq.htmlJump to Natural and human factors that influence the climate (known as ...- Natural climate drivers include the energy ... in snow and ice cover thatchange how much ... if it were not for these human-made and natural tiny particles.
[.....]
`
You've seen this before.
AR6 added the graph to the right. GSAT is Global Surface Air Temperature.
That's ok, just checking that it's a miniscule amount that's allegedly going to wipe out life.This has been asked and answered several times in the last couple days. Try to pay more attention. CO2 currently makes up 420 ppmV or 0.042% by volume. Exciting?
Clouds are listed on the GSAT side. I don't know, but I bet it explains it in the caption. Could you look that up for us?Why did they leave out clouds?
