How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

[EMH]

Why would they be the same?

Why wouldn't they?

Greenland and Antarctica are the same... same Bat Planet, same Bat H20....

because Greenland's ice took a million years to get to the southern tip...

Post your evidence

5,000 times already posted.


Top of northern Greenland has 2 million year old DNA = green 2 million years ago

Middle of Greenland went ice age 400k-800k years ago

Vikings chased off Southern Tip by advancing ice age = 1400s

Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green

Greenland was once carpeted in lush forests, a new study shows.

www.livescience.com

A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA - Nature

Analysis of two-million-year-old ancient environmental DNA from the Kap København Formation in North Greenland shows there was an open boreal forest with diverse plant and animal species, of which several taxa have not previously been detected at the site, representing an ecosystem that has no...

www.nature.com

Everyone here has seen these over and over. So have you TROLL...


You and McBullshit and Dennis Quaid are all laughable claiming ice ages are quick and fast. They are, duh, GLACIAL...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why wouldn't they?

Greenland and Antarctica are the same... same Bat Planet, same Bat H20....






5,000 times already posted.


Top of northern Greenland has 2 million year old DNA = green 2 million years ago

Middle of Greenland went ice age 400k-800k years ago

Vikings chased off Southern Tip by advancing ice age = 1400s

Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green

Greenland was once carpeted in lush forests, a new study shows.

www.livescience.com

A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA - Nature

Analysis of two-million-year-old ancient environmental DNA from the Kap København Formation in North Greenland shows there was an open boreal forest with diverse plant and animal species, of which several taxa have not previously been detected at the site, representing an ecosystem that has no...

www.nature.com

Everyone here has seen these over and over. So have you TROLL...


You and McBullshit and Dennis Quaid are all laughable claiming ice ages are quick and fast. They are, duh, GLACIAL...

Why wouldn't they?

One is on a pole. One is thousands of miles away.
One is a continent, one isn't.

And everyone understand, this is arguing that an ice age that started in Northern Canada put 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago in 75k years....

Post your evidence it was 20,000,000 years.

When the North American Ice Age started in northern Canada and got to 76k years old, its ice had not gotten close to Chicago....

Post your evidence.

because Greenland's ice took a million years to get to the southern tip...

Post your evidence

 

[EMH]

One is on a pole. One is thousands of miles away.

Nice try. Greenland is within 600 miles of a pole and hence is in ICE AGE.

One is a continent, one isn't

LOL!!!

Whether or not you define Greenland as continent or island is irrelevant. It is in ICE AGE because of where the top of Northern Greenland is.

Post your evidence

Since that answer is in the post above yours, and this is the 800th time you've pulled this trolling crap, an honest non-partisan Mod would ban you...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nice try. Greenland is within 600 miles of a pole and hence is in ICE AGE.




LOL!!!

Whether or not you define Greenland as continent or island is irrelevant. It is in ICE AGE because of where the top of Northern Greenland is.





Since that answer is in the post above yours, and this is the 800th time you've pulled this trolling crap, an honest non-partisan Mod would ban you...

Nice try. Greenland is within 600 miles of a pole and hence is in ICE AGE.

Nice try.

So why the difference between glaciers on Chicago vs. Antarctica?
Post your evidence
Since that answer is in the post above yours, and this is the 800th time you've pulled this trolling crap

Funny coming from the troll who never posted any evidence.

 

[ReinyDays]

Whether or not you define Greenland as continent or island is irrelevant.

Greenland is part of North America ... the sea-floor spreading is centered in Iceland, east of Greenland ... you can tell because of all the volcanoes in Iceland, but not Greenland ... ha ha ha ...

The Wikipedia article on Antarctica still doesn't support your claims ... do you have an actual scientific citation of are you just making this up as you go along? ... what does ice at 90ºS have to do with no ice in summer at 45ºN ... noting of course the tragic and deadly ice build up in Chicago every winter ... people are just insane to live there IMEIO, no matter how sophisticated the Chase Auditorium is ...

 

[jc456]

Trolling = endlessly asking the same question already answered over and over...


Your argument is that 2.5 mile thick glacier covering Chicago was part of an "ice age" that was only 75k years old.

They have 130k years of data out of Greenland ice cores... and of course an ice core from a glacier doesn't go all the way down, it just scoops from the data that is conveniently good at the top.

Explain how it took Antarctica 40+ million years to get 2.5 mile thick glaciers but Chicago (from Northern Canada no less) took 75k...

Explain how Chicago glaciers 2.5 miles thick are 75k years old while Antarctic glaciers 2.5 miles thick have 800k years of good ice core data....

???????


You won't explain that because you aren't here to debate, you are here to troll.

It is funny you don't understand the debate on this. No, you haven't presented one link or document that proves what you're stating. Not a one. Pictures don't count and has been explained to you, if you Wish to discuss trolling. The ask was made and you failed to post one. Every time in fact.

 

[jc456]

Hardly. Every researcher who studied the issue prior to 2010 came to that same conclusion. Anyone who thinks a glacier 2.5 miles high is not millions of years old is a complete glacier moron.

post a link that confirms that. That has been the ask for many pages now.

 

[jc456]

My side says at least 30,000,000

post one link from your side.

 

[ReinyDays]

I think we're into "physics has nothing to do with glaciers" rhetoric now ... [yawn] ... we can just have S'Tommy dig a hole in his backyard to prove EMH is wrong ... the soil horizons are clear ...

 

[EMH]

Greenland is part of North America

No it is not...

 

[EMH]

The Wikipedia article

spews bullshit about McBullshit as if Antarctica melted after it got to the South Pole = laughable.

 

[EMH]

deadly ice build up in Chicago every winter

Some day maybe you will understand the difference between a snow storm and being buried under 2.5 miles of ice, but not yet...

 

[EMH]

It is funny you don't understand the debate on this. No, you haven't presented one link or document that proves what you're stating. Not a one. Pictures don't count and has been explained to you, if you Wish to discuss trolling. The ask was made and you failed to post one. Every time in fact.

That is one giant lie without a specific instance of where I have failed to document

SPECIFY

 

[EMH]

post one link from your side.

Wow, you are as bad as the Global Warming parrots. If you cannot PARROT it from someone online, it doesn't exist...


How old do you think the ice age that started in Northern Canada that put 2.5 mile glacier on Chicago was? 75k?

 

[EMH]

post a link that confirms that. That has been the ask for many pages now.

Post one link from BEFORE 2010 that says otherwise. All of those are after homO's 2 year silence. Coincidence?

BAWK ON...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Post one link from BEFORE 2010 that says otherwise. All of those are after homO's 2 year silence. Coincidence?

BAWK ON...

All your evidence was deleted by Obama?

He really was magic!

 

[EMH]

All your evidence was deleted by Obama?

He really was magic!

Not mine. Search for North American Ice Age and you get nothing... but McBullshit cycles...

Although the Great Ice Age began a million or more years ago, the last major ice sheet to spread across the North Central United States reached its maximum extent about 20,000 years ago.

ie - Dennis Quaid is right, "ice ages" retreat and expand FULLY based on Co2 in tens of thousands of years, not millions

north american ice age - Google Search

www.google.com

then click on images

north american ice age - Google Search

www.google.com

and you get tons of maps... including this one, which clearly disputes McBullshit because the maximum extent is clearly way past Chicago... which McBullshit says was the max...

So there is a dispute. And all of the McBullshit stuff is after homO's two years of silence...

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

www.google.com

Which then boils down to HOW OLD WERE THE 2.5 MILE THICK GLACIERS on CHICAGO...



Let's stop there.

How old those glaciers were is a key question that there is a dispute.



Agreed

You say 75k, I say 30-50 million years...

 

[EMH]

Nice try. Greenland is within 600 miles of a pole and hence is in ICE AGE.

Nice try.

OK, if you dispute that, then explain why Greenland is covered with ice age glaciers...

and Alaska far further north is NOT....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not mine. Search for North American Ice Age and you get nothing... but McBullshit cycles...

Although the Great Ice Age began a million or more years ago, the last major ice sheet to spread across the North Central United States reached its maximum extent about 20,000 years ago.

ie - Dennis Quaid is right, "ice ages" retreat and expand FULLY based on Co2 in tens of thousands of years, not millions

north american ice age - Google Search

www.google.com

then click on images

north american ice age - Google Search

www.google.com

and you get tons of maps... including this one, which clearly disputes McBullshit because the maximum extent is clearly way past Chicago... which McBullshit says was the max...

So there is a dispute. And all of the McBullshit stuff is after homO's two years of silence...

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

www.google.com

Which then boils down to HOW OLD WERE THE 2.5 MILE THICK GLACIERS on CHICAGO...



Let's stop there.

How old those glaciers were is a key question that there is a dispute.



Agreed

You say 75k, I say 30-50 million years...

You say 75k, I say 30-50 million years...

You just don't have a bit of evidence.

 

[EMH]

You say 75k, I say 30-50 million years...

You just don't have a bit of evidence.

Started a new topic.

Tired of posting the same stuff over and over.

Go there to dispute...