Disir
Platinum Member
- Sep 30, 2011
- 28,003
- 9,610
- 910
No. Obama thought he could just go in and play Arab Spring and that isn't how it worked out. At all. He had no problem whatsoever destabilizing the region. Hillary and Obama thought they could go in and fund the rebels and overthrow Assad. It was some of the most power resource grabbing crap.
Yes, Obama tried to do something and it has not worked out like that. In Libya he was just plain wrong for doing what he did, and was just having a continuation of previous policy, when he had seemed to want to go in a different direction.
But he didn't destablize the region. He didn't particularly help either, the region was already unstable.
Syria was just the sort of policy where the US knows what it wants, but doesn't want to risk anything to get it because they know it's not worth it. So they start things and then don't finish them, and this causes more problems.
Obama absolutely destabilized the region.
The region was already destabilized, unless of course you think Iraq didn't happen.
U.S.-Financed Groups Had Supporting Role in Arab Uprisings
Yes, the point isn't that the Obama administration didn't help push the Arab Spring. My point was that the region was already in turmoil for the Arab Spring to even be able to take off.