Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You couldn't argue the points of my argument. You're a born loser.
IT DOESN'T MATTER YOU FRIGGIN IDIOT. He is running for the chance. You have no skin in this game. If Trumps investigation was legit, he would have contacted the FBI, not Ukraine.You people are such dumb fucks; Amid scrutiny, Rudy Giuliani heads to Ukraine He held back tax payer money you fool. My money. Get a fuckin clue.
No I didn't, because he wasn't doing it to try and get dirt on his political opponent like Trump was.IT DOESN'T MATTER YOU FRIGGIN IDIOT. He is running for the chance. You have no skin in this game. If Trumps investigation was legit, he would have contacted the FBI, not Ukraine.
Trump didn't hold back anything.
Did you have an issue with VP Biden threatening to withhold funds?
Trump called it a favor, remember? Nothing was mentioned about a treaty. Lol! You just presented an irrelevant argument that means nothing. Trump wanted a favor from the president of Ukraine in exchange for military assistance. Legal assistance in criminal matters is not contingent on holding up tax payer funded money to Ukraine. That's called an illegal bribe. Get a clue.You couldn't argue the points of my argument. You're a born loser.
Here's something for ya!
Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
Text - Treaty Document 106-16 - Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
Read it
Learn something
I'll bbl to quiz you.
Much Love,
William J. Clinton.
Yeah, that’s why Ukraine had already started investigating them. LolThere’s nothing to ‘investigate’ – that an ‘investigation’ is ‘warranted’ is a lie.The democrats are accusing Trump of soliciting "foreign interference" in the 2020 election by asking the Ukraine to investigate Burisma. How is investigating Burisma the same as investigating Joe Biden? I'm not seeing the connection. No wonder the voters are rejecting the democrat's inane coup plot, and as Professor Turley explained, it is the democrats in the House that are abusing their power, not Trump.
House Democrats' impeachment report accuses Trump of obstruction, other misconduct
Democrats on Tuesday publicly released a new report accusing President Donald Trump of soliciting Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election for his benefit and obstructing the impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives.
The 300-page report alleges a quid pro quo scheme in which Trump “conditioned official acts on a public announcement by the new Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, of politically-motivated investigations” into former Vice President Joe Biden — a top Democratic presidential candidate — and his son Hunter.
“In pressuring President Zelensky to carry out his demand, President Trump withheld a White House meeting desperately sought by the Ukrainian President, and critical U.S. military assistance to fight Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine,” the report says.
Here's another article with the same accusation:
House Democrats conclude Trump solicited foreign interference in 2020
WASHINGTON – Three House committees investigating the potential impeachment of President Donald Trump uncovered a months-long effort "to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election," according to their draft report released Tuesday.
Let's take a poll....
The right’s propaganda campaign of lies, misinformation, and fake news – such as the lie that Biden was involved in ‘wrongdoing’ concerning Ukraine – is intended to mislead and misinform voters in an effort to turn the voters against Biden.
The lies contrived and propagated by Russia and other foreign entities – with rightists in the United States doing their bidding – are part of Russia’s ongoing interference in the 2020 General Election, and the American political process overall.
Russia preparing ‘perfect storm’ of 2020 election interference, officials warn
2017 Lie of the Year: Russian election action is a hoax
IT DOESN'T MATTER YOU FRIGGIN IDIOT. He is running for the chance. You have no skin in this game. If Trumps investigation was legit, he would have contacted the FBI, not Ukraine.The Dems already proved the crimes with zero Republican defense of those crime. If he is acquitted, that will be the cesspool the Republicans will have to lie in until the election. There are no known defenses for Trump, via the crimes that were proven. The important takeaway from all of this is, Democrats will come out on top proving the crimes, and be leaders in the pursuit of justice, the truth, the rule of law, and the Constitution. Republicans will no longer be the one's the country goes to for legal and moral guidance. They will have earned the official title of criminal organization. They will never be viewed as a party again.What will be "cemented" for 2020 voters is that Trump will be acquitted in the senate, and the democrat's coup plots exposed.
The dems will not be able to prove any crime. All the dems have is hearsay and presumptions, and you apparently can't name any crime either.
You have once again proven yourself to be an absolute idiot with zero functioning’s brain cells. See moron, you can NOT call Plugs Biden a political opponent yet as he has not won his party’s nomination. Biden’s opponents are the other clowns and his own mouth. And his roaming hands. Now STFU. You’re embarrassing yourself more than usual.
Try to understand this moron. Biden is NOT running for President yet. He has not received a nomination yet has he? Thus he is running for a CHANCE to run for President. Of course you lack of brain causes you to not understand that FACT. You lose. Again. As usual.
Negative! The witnesses did testify under sworn testimony that crimes were committed. It wasn't the job of the scholars to decide. They just confirmed that what the witnesses said are confirmed, they were all impeachable offenses. There is zero defense. Stop being so pitifully desperate.Your point is pointless, because Biden and burisma were brought up in the sworn testimony from a dozen or so witnesses, plus three legal scholars cementing the validity of the crimes as pointed out by the witnesses.Clearly the crime Trump is guilty of is investigating Democrats that have committed criminal acts.Unless he has something to hide...
Exactly the point I'm trying to make in the OP.
There is no connection between Biden and Burisma, unless there is a crime involved.
And none of them, including the radical scholars, would admit that a crime had been committed.
Why would we, the US, investigate a foreign company not in our legal jurisdiction?The democrats are accusing Trump of soliciting "foreign interference" in the 2020 election by asking the Ukraine to investigate Burisma. How is investigating Burisma the same as investigating Joe Biden? I'm not seeing the connection. No wonder the voters are rejecting the democrat's inane coup plot, and as Professor Turley explained, it is the democrats in the House that are abusing their power, not Trump.
House Democrats' impeachment report accuses Trump of obstruction, other misconduct
Democrats on Tuesday publicly released a new report accusing President Donald Trump of soliciting Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election for his benefit and obstructing the impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives.
The 300-page report alleges a quid pro quo scheme in which Trump “conditioned official acts on a public announcement by the new Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, of politically-motivated investigations” into former Vice President Joe Biden — a top Democratic presidential candidate — and his son Hunter.
“In pressuring President Zelensky to carry out his demand, President Trump withheld a White House meeting desperately sought by the Ukrainian President, and critical U.S. military assistance to fight Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine,” the report says.
Here's another article with the same accusation:
House Democrats conclude Trump solicited foreign interference in 2020
WASHINGTON – Three House committees investigating the potential impeachment of President Donald Trump uncovered a months-long effort "to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election," according to their draft report released Tuesday.
Let's take a poll....
I hope the senate "rules" for the impeachment trial have the following:
1. No new evidence can be admitted
2. No hearsay evidence is allowed
If those are in effect the dems have no case.
I hope the senate "rules" for the impeachment trial have the following:
1. No new evidence can be admitted
2. No hearsay evidence is allowed
If those are in effect the dems have no case.
Why would oppose no new evidence be admitted?
I hope the senate "rules" for the impeachment trial have the following:
1. No new evidence can be admitted
2. No hearsay evidence is allowed
If those are in effect the dems have no case.
Why would oppose no new evidence be admitted?
The House either has a valid case for impeachment or not, as written.
Its just making the Senate rules favorable to the president, the same way the House made their rules unfair to the president.
I hope the senate "rules" for the impeachment trial have the following:
1. No new evidence can be admitted
2. No hearsay evidence is allowed
If those are in effect the dems have no case.
Why would oppose no new evidence be admitted?
The House either has a valid case for impeachment or not, as written.
Its just making the Senate rules favorable to the president, the same way the House made their rules unfair to the president.
What was unfair about the House rules?
I hope the senate "rules" for the impeachment trial have the following:
1. No new evidence can be admitted
2. No hearsay evidence is allowed
If those are in effect the dems have no case.
Why would oppose no new evidence be admitted?
The House either has a valid case for impeachment or not, as written.
Its just making the Senate rules favorable to the president, the same way the House made their rules unfair to the president.
What was unfair about the House rules?
1. The GOP couldn't call all the witnesses they wanted, such as Ciaramella, Hunter Biden, Chalupa, etc.
2. The Chair told witnesses not to answer GOP many questions
3. The GOP wasn't allowed to issue subpoenas.
4. The democrats did not follow the same protocols for impeachment that were used previously, such as allowing "hearsay" evidence.
I hope the senate "rules" for the impeachment trial have the following:
1. No new evidence can be admitted
2. No hearsay evidence is allowed
If those are in effect the dems have no case.
Why would oppose no new evidence be admitted?
The House either has a valid case for impeachment or not, as written.
Its just making the Senate rules favorable to the president, the same way the House made their rules unfair to the president.
What was unfair about the House rules?
1. The GOP couldn't call all the witnesses they wanted, such as Ciaramella, Hunter Biden, Chalupa, etc.
2. The Chair told witnesses not to answer GOP many questions
3. The GOP wasn't allowed to issue subpoenas.
4. The democrats did not follow the same protocols for impeachment that were used previously, such as allowing "hearsay" evidence.
1. none of those are fact witnesses to Trump’s actions. You don’t get to hijack the proceeding to chase down an unrelated matter.
2. The Chair told a few witnesses not to answer questions intended to unmask a whistleblower and were irrelevant to the matter
3. That’s how all committees work. The minority doesn’t get to issue subpoenas unless agreed to by the majority.
4. Hearsay evidence is very often admissible. There are plenty of rules governing it.
If Biden did nothing wrong, then what political dirt are they worried about?Political dirt you idiot.The democrats are accusing Trump of soliciting "foreign interference" in the 2020 election by asking the Ukraine to investigate Burisma. How is investigating Burisma the same as investigating Joe Biden? I'm not seeing the connection. No wonder the voters are rejecting the democrat's inane coup plot, and as Professor Turley explained, it is the democrats in the House that are abusing their power, not Trump.
House Democrats' impeachment report accuses Trump of obstruction, other misconduct
Democrats on Tuesday publicly released a new report accusing President Donald Trump of soliciting Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election for his benefit and obstructing the impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives.
The 300-page report alleges a quid pro quo scheme in which Trump “conditioned official acts on a public announcement by the new Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, of politically-motivated investigations” into former Vice President Joe Biden — a top Democratic presidential candidate — and his son Hunter.
“In pressuring President Zelensky to carry out his demand, President Trump withheld a White House meeting desperately sought by the Ukrainian President, and critical U.S. military assistance to fight Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine,” the report says.
Here's another article with the same accusation:
House Democrats conclude Trump solicited foreign interference in 2020
WASHINGTON – Three House committees investigating the potential impeachment of President Donald Trump uncovered a months-long effort "to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election," according to their draft report released Tuesday.
Let's take a poll....
What the witnesses confirmed aligns with the physical evidence of Trumps own big mouth.Negative! The witnesses did testify under sworn testimony that crimes were committed. It wasn't the job of the scholars to decide. They just confirmed that what the witnesses said are confirmed, they were all impeachable offenses. There is zero defense. Stop being so pitifully desperate.Your point is pointless, because Biden and burisma were brought up in the sworn testimony from a dozen or so witnesses, plus three legal scholars cementing the validity of the crimes as pointed out by the witnesses.Clearly the crime Trump is guilty of is investigating Democrats that have committed criminal acts.
Exactly the point I'm trying to make in the OP.
There is no connection between Biden and Burisma, unless there is a crime involved.
And none of them, including the radical scholars, would admit that a crime had been committed.
You've got one typo that is a mistake.
They just confirmed that what the witnesses said "were" confirmed, they were all impeachable offenses.
That's the issue. What the witnesses said was not confirmed or proven.
I never said Biden was worried about anything. That's not the issue. The issue is that Trump committed a conspiracy to defraud the US from a free and fair election.If Biden did nothing wrong, then what political dirt are they worried about?Political dirt you idiot.The democrats are accusing Trump of soliciting "foreign interference" in the 2020 election by asking the Ukraine to investigate Burisma. How is investigating Burisma the same as investigating Joe Biden? I'm not seeing the connection. No wonder the voters are rejecting the democrat's inane coup plot, and as Professor Turley explained, it is the democrats in the House that are abusing their power, not Trump.
House Democrats' impeachment report accuses Trump of obstruction, other misconduct
Democrats on Tuesday publicly released a new report accusing President Donald Trump of soliciting Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 election for his benefit and obstructing the impeachment inquiry in the House of Representatives.
The 300-page report alleges a quid pro quo scheme in which Trump “conditioned official acts on a public announcement by the new Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, of politically-motivated investigations” into former Vice President Joe Biden — a top Democratic presidential candidate — and his son Hunter.
“In pressuring President Zelensky to carry out his demand, President Trump withheld a White House meeting desperately sought by the Ukrainian President, and critical U.S. military assistance to fight Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine,” the report says.
Here's another article with the same accusation:
House Democrats conclude Trump solicited foreign interference in 2020
WASHINGTON – Three House committees investigating the potential impeachment of President Donald Trump uncovered a months-long effort "to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election," according to their draft report released Tuesday.
Let's take a poll....
Republicans couldn't call witnesses.I hope the senate "rules" for the impeachment trial have the following:
1. No new evidence can be admitted
2. No hearsay evidence is allowed
If those are in effect the dems have no case.
Why would oppose no new evidence be admitted?
The House either has a valid case for impeachment or not, as written.
Its just making the Senate rules favorable to the president, the same way the House made their rules unfair to the president.
What was unfair about the House rules?
