320 Years of History
Gold Member
I couldn't help but notice that she keeps describing Trump as dangerous. Dangerous foreign policy. Dangerous economic plan, dangerous mid east policy, etc etc. It is like the DNC is handing out instructions to say everything Trump does is dangerous because they know that this is his biggest weakness. Some people may perceive him as a loose cannon and it appears that the Hillary team is going to capitalize and exploit that at every turn.
Nah...they just know their voter base doesn't have a broad vocabulary. LOL There are many synonyms and near synonyms she could have used almost indiscriminately and her points would have been equally germane and accurate. When it comes to describing what precious little there is to Trump's policies, numerous terms apply: nocuous, baneful and baleful, malignant, ruinous, pernicious, parlous and perilous, to list just a few.
Truly, it has become so common to deride Trump that my closest friends and I have made an informal requirement amongst ourselves to at this point only do so alliteratively or keep mum. Something entertaining and pleasurable, besides laughing at Trump and his surrogates' inanity, needs to come from such conversations....LOL
It must be great to be a 'liberal' because you have the freedom to say what you want about the other guy's politician without the fear of retaliation from other people. I can't really say that other people have the same freedom considering how many threads actually get banned on this forum by 'liberals'. It must be great to be you.
I'm not really aware of many threads having been banned. I'm sure there are some, however. The threads I've initiated and in which I have taken controversially conservative stances haven't been banned/closed. Perhaps the poor quality of one's/folks' arguments and remarks that lead to threads being closed? I don't know; I'm not one who closes threads.
BTW, what does your comment have to do with my post? I don't see the thematic connection.