How many times will Hillary Clinton inject the word 'dangerous' into her speeches?

I couldn't help but notice that she keeps describing Trump as dangerous. Dangerous foreign policy. Dangerous economic plan, dangerous mid east policy, etc etc. It is like the DNC is handing out instructions to say everything Trump does is dangerous because they know that this is his biggest weakness. Some people may perceive him as a loose cannon and it appears that the Hillary team is going to capitalize and exploit that at every turn.

Nah...they just know their voter base doesn't have a broad vocabulary. LOL There are many synonyms and near synonyms she could have used almost indiscriminately and her points would have been equally germane and accurate. When it comes to describing what precious little there is to Trump's policies, numerous terms apply: nocuous, baneful and baleful, malignant, ruinous, pernicious, parlous and perilous, to list just a few.

Truly, it has become so common to deride Trump that my closest friends and I have made an informal requirement amongst ourselves to at this point only do so alliteratively or keep mum. Something entertaining and pleasurable, besides laughing at Trump and his surrogates' inanity, needs to come from such conversations....LOL

It must be great to be a 'liberal' because you have the freedom to say what you want about the other guy's politician without the fear of retaliation from other people. I can't really say that other people have the same freedom considering how many threads actually get banned on this forum by 'liberals'. It must be great to be you.

I'm not really aware of many threads having been banned. I'm sure there are some, however. The threads I've initiated and in which I have taken controversially conservative stances haven't been banned/closed. Perhaps the poor quality of one's/folks' arguments and remarks that lead to threads being closed? I don't know; I'm not one who closes threads.

BTW, what does your comment have to do with my post? I don't see the thematic connection.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/us/politics/transcript-trump-foreign-policy.html?_r=0

It all began with a dangerous idea that we could make western democracies out of countries that had no experience or interests in becoming a western democracy.

It is a dangerous world, more dangerous now than it has ever been.


Miami Debate:

TRUMP: We have some protesters who are bad dudes, they have done bad things. They are swinging, they are really dangerous and they get in there and they start hitting people.



Detroit Debate:

We are in a very dangerous place. We have a depleted military. Totally depleted.


Trump calls for Muslim ban:

Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life.

Your point being? I really can't see the point that you are making other than Trump said the word dangerous. I wasn't accusing Hillary of using the word dangerous because that would be stupid. It would be like accusing someone of using the word 'at', 'bee', or 'button'. It wouldn't make any sense to do that at all. What I said was that it is a part of her political strategy to capitalize on the fears and doubts people may have about Trump. It is a part of her overall strategy to say everything he does is dangerous.
 
I couldn't help but notice that she keeps describing Trump as dangerous. Dangerous foreign policy. Dangerous economic plan, dangerous mid east policy, etc etc. It is like the DNC is handing out instructions to say everything Trump does is dangerous because they know that this is his biggest weakness. Some people may perceive him as a loose cannon and it appears that the Hillary team is going to capitalize and exploit that at every turn.

Nah...they just know their voter base doesn't have a broad vocabulary. LOL There are many synonyms and near synonyms she could have used almost indiscriminately and her points would have been equally germane and accurate. When it comes to describing what precious little there is to Trump's policies, numerous terms apply: nocuous, baneful and baleful, malignant, ruinous, pernicious, parlous and perilous, to list just a few.

Truly, it has become so common to deride Trump that my closest friends and I have made an informal requirement amongst ourselves to at this point only do so alliteratively or keep mum. Something entertaining and pleasurable, besides laughing at Trump and his surrogates' inanity, needs to come from such conversations....LOL

It must be great to be a 'liberal' because you have the freedom to say what you want about the other guy's politician without the fear of retaliation from other people. I can't really say that other people have the same freedom considering how many threads actually get banned on this forum by 'liberals'. It must be great to be you.

I'm not really aware of many threads having been banned. I'm sure there are some, however. The threads I've initiated and in which I have taken controversially conservative stances haven't been banned/closed. Perhaps the poor quality of one's/folks' arguments and remarks that lead to threads being closed?

That is not a reason to ban something.
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/28/us/politics/transcript-trump-foreign-policy.html?_r=0

It all began with a dangerous idea that we could make western democracies out of countries that had no experience or interests in becoming a western democracy.

It is a dangerous world, more dangerous now than it has ever been.


Miami Debate:

TRUMP: We have some protesters who are bad dudes, they have done bad things. They are swinging, they are really dangerous and they get in there and they start hitting people.



Detroit Debate:

We are in a very dangerous place. We have a depleted military. Totally depleted.


Trump calls for Muslim ban:

Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life.

Your point being? I really can't see the point that you are making other than Trump said the word dangerous. I wasn't accusing Hillary of using the word dangerous because that would be stupid. It would be like accusing someone of using the word 'at', 'bee', or 'button'. It wouldn't make any sense to do that at all. What I said was that it is a part of her political strategy to capitalize on the fears and doubts people may have about Trump. It is a part of her overall strategy to say everything he does is dangerous.

Even Hillary can be right once in a while.
 
Hillary can survive "crooked."

"Dangerous" Donald is a political death sentence.

The left have come to this realization for some time now and have accepted it as that's just who she is....
Crooked and deceitful and over the top ambitious who doesn't care one bit about the people she needs to elect her.
That's the Hildebeast.
 
All people have freedom of speech.

But not all expression is freedom of speech.

I am just going to say that is quite informative because if all expression isn't protected under freedom of speech then how do you say all people can express themselves as much as they want? It just points out to the fact that 'liberals' today are not liberals at all.
Your comment just points out you don't understand language above the 8th grade.

You are just a fascist asshole who should be taken on a hunting trip to meet up with some banjo playing homosexual rapist. Seriously...fuck yourself in the ass.
As I said . . .
 
Hillary can survive "crooked."

"Dangerous" Donald is a political death sentence.

The left have come to this realization for some time now and have accepted it as that's just who she is....
Crooked and deceitful and over the top ambitious who doesn't care one bit about the people she needs to elect her.
That's the Hildebeast.
Yeah but if the choice is Joffrey or the Imp, I'm going with immoral and ambitious.
 
Dangerous Donald. Hmmm...that's fair. After all, he stuck an adjective on all his opponents. Lyin' Ted. Little Marco. Crazy Bernie. Crooked Hillary.

Turnabout is fair play.

Dangerous Donald. I like it!
 
Hillary can survive "crooked."

"Dangerous" Donald is a political death sentence.

The left have come to this realization for some time now and have accepted it as that's just who she is....
Crooked and deceitful and over the top ambitious who doesn't care one bit about the people she needs to elect her.
That's the Hildebeast.
And Donald is dangerous.

That is why I am voting for Johnson.
 
It is directly proportionate to the number of time he, Donald "The Liar" Trump, uses the phrase "Crooked" Hillary.

But seriously anyone who is constantly out of touch with "known reality" as Donald is, would truly a dangerous president. He would be a danger to us all, not just the select minorities he targets.
 
Dangerous Donald. Hmmm...that's fair. After all, he stuck an adjective on all his opponents. Lyin' Ted. Little Marco. Crazy Bernie. Crooked Hillary.

Turnabout is fair play.

Dangerous Donald. I like it!
Donny Dangerous! :D

Or does my handle make him sound too much like a super hero?????
 
On the 9-11 attack on US in 2012 50 days before the Election, Hillary proved how dangerous she can be.......reckless is more like it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top