🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

How Mass Shooters Got Their Guns

if the loony had used a pressure cooker,,what would Obama have said during the speech?
well since the shooter was obama's son; he probably would blame the white zoning and permit committee for allowing a school to be built there
so therefore Obama would not ban the sales of pressure cookers? this means i will still be able to cook rice a roni?


This isnt Tiananmen square!! :lmao:
 
What more do you want? They did not get flagged because except for the Virginia Tech guy they had not done anything that would flag them. And in Virginia's case they refused to provide mental decisions to the Fed.

Police and speed limits don't stop all speeders - but they sure as hell help keep us safer. Same with vehicle laws and enforcement. You rigid gun nutters are hurting all responsible gun owners.


And we have laws equivalent to speed limits…if you use a gun to commit a crime….as in if you break the speed limit…you are punished. We already have those laws for guns.
There is no law prohibiting people from buying a car and even with drunk driving…you are not arrested until you are actually caught breaking he law and driving drunk. And in many cases…you can even drive with a drunk driving conviction if you blow into a tube. What you are suggesting is this….that all drivers must blow into a tube to drive their car just in case they might, might be a drunk driver…instead of mandating the tube for people actually convicted of drunk driving….

That is the proper analogy.
 
So….all of the mass shooters either bought their guns legally or got them when the system broke down or got them illegally……..just what we have been saying since I started posting here….you could have skipped reading that article.

What you guys propose….licensing gun owners, registering guns and universal background checks……all of the mass shooters in the article would have gotten around those three things either by complying with them….or by stealing their guns, or by a government screw up.

So….now that those things are shown not to keep guns out of the hands of mass shooters…what is your next proposal?
 
What do you NaziCon gun nutters think of Martin O'Malley's gun control measures? This is serious shit. If you nutters don't bend - this may be what is coming down the road.

Preventing and Reducing Gun Violence - Martin O'Malley for President

O'Malley is a Leftist douchebag if there ever was one. Even Maryland doesn't like him.

Let me ask you this. If even 10% of the 100,000,000+ gun owners in this country refuse to comply with gun control measures, what do you think would happen?

After all, you people claim we can't move 12,000,000 unarmed illegal invaders.

Sanity will prevail. Ninety percent (90%) of Americans want universal background checks - so that WILL happen in the not too distant future. We also need to greatly improve the accuracy of the federal NICS system.


90% of Americans do not know the issue of Universal Background Checks which is what o'malley and you guys depend on…if they did know the issue they wouldn't support it.
 
Criminal histories and documented mental health problems did not prevent at least eight of the gunmen in 14 recent mass shootings from obtaining their weapons, after federal background checks led to approval of the purchases of the guns used.

DETAILS: How They Got Their Guns - The New York Times

This is a very informative article, and it's non-partisan. It highlights the obvious fact that the NICS federal background checks systems must be improved. Even if a universal background checks system is approved, the system won't be effective until all relevant information is fed into the system.

Hasn't the last couple gotten them from their mommies and daddies? Oregon got em from his Mom, church guy got his from his dad.

Parents quit buying weaponry for your children.


Wrong on both counts….Oregon got his own guns. S.C. got his own gun because the state messed up the background check.
 
If you want to stop private sellers from selling to criminals….and your intent is actually to stop criminals from getting guns and not to make it harder for law abiding people to sell guns…then my solution is the best. When you get a criminal and convict him of a gun crime put a tattoo on his shoulder. Then, if he tries to buy a gun at a private seller, that seller just has to ask to see his shoulder. If he has the mark, the seller knows not to sell him the gun…….easy….immediate….focuses solely on criminals and not law abiding people.

This keeps law abiding people from getting caught in a felony trap if they sell a gun to a neighbor and don't get a background check……

YOu also do not need to license gun owners, register guns or have universal background checks since all three are easily avoided, already, by criminals and mass shooters.

You save money, time, manpower and paperwork. ANd you make it easy for a law abiding citizen to know if they can sell a gun to a buyer.
 
What do you NaziCon gun nutters think of Martin O'Malley's gun control measures? This is serious shit. If you nutters don't bend - this may be what is coming down the road.

Preventing and Reducing Gun Violence - Martin O'Malley for President

O'Malley is a Leftist douchebag if there ever was one. Even Maryland doesn't like him.

Let me ask you this. If even 10% of the 100,000,000+ gun owners in this country refuse to comply with gun control measures, what do you think would happen?

After all, you people claim we can't move 12,000,000 unarmed illegal invaders.

Sanity will prevail. Ninety percent (90%) of Americans want universal background checks - so that WILL happen in the not too distant future. We also need to greatly improve the accuracy of the federal NICS system.


90% of Americans do not know the issue of Universal Background Checks which is what o'malley and you guys depend on…if they did know the issue they wouldn't support it.

So, you're suggesting that 90% of Americans are stupid and 10% are smart? Is that why responsible gun owners also overwhelmingly support universal background checks? Funny...
 
Criminal histories and documented mental health problems did not prevent at least eight of the gunmen in 14 recent mass shootings from obtaining their weapons, after federal background checks led to approval of the purchases of the guns used.

DETAILS: How They Got Their Guns - The New York Times

This is a very informative article, and it's non-partisan. It highlights the obvious fact that the NICS federal background checks systems must be improved. Even if a universal background checks system is approved, the system won't be effective until all relevant information is fed into the system.
Why do your proposed gun grabbing laws never actually prevent the shooting it's drafted in response to?
admitting they don't work and then going...but, but, but...... funny stuff. But this!!!!!!
 
If you want to stop private sellers from selling to criminals….and your intent is actually to stop criminals from getting guns and not to make it harder for law abiding people to sell guns…then my solution is the best. When you get a criminal and convict him of a gun crime put a tattoo on his shoulder. Then, if he tries to buy a gun at a private seller, that seller just has to ask to see his shoulder. If he has the mark, the seller knows not to sell him the gun…….easy….immediate….focuses solely on criminals and not law abiding people.

This keeps law abiding people from getting caught in a felony trap if they sell a gun to a neighbor and don't get a background check……

YOu also do not need to license gun owners, register guns or have universal background checks since all three are easily avoided, already, by criminals and mass shooters.

You save money, time, manpower and paperwork. ANd you make it easy for a law abiding citizen to know if they can sell a gun to a buyer.
fail.. sorry, but fail..... there is nothing that will help. NOTHING. crazy is crazy and until there is legislation on crazy, you're tough out of luck.
 
If you want to stop private sellers from selling to criminals….and your intent is actually to stop criminals from getting guns and not to make it harder for law abiding people to sell guns…
Make it harder for people to sell guns? OMFG! The truth comes out

Some things in life are tougher than others, Sellers can still make profits with tougher gun laws. What will probably happen is they will sell less guns

thank you :clap2:
 
It's no game and you are wrong. According to these numbers 1,200,000 babies are murdered each year...

abortion is legal. It is not murder


Slavery was legal too…...
Imbecile alert!

Slavery as a wrong was undeniable. Abortion is not murder.
yes it is.
Murder is a crime and it is prosecuted
doesn't mean that abortion isn't murder. It is. i'll make that claim till I die. Now you can't justify killing a heart that is beating. It's murder. PERIOD. I don't care what five people say with robes on.
 
abortion is legal. It is not murder


Slavery was legal too…...
Imbecile alert!

Slavery as a wrong was undeniable. Abortion is not murder.
yes it is.
Murder is a crime and it is prosecuted
doesn't mean that abortion isn't murder. It is. i'll make that claim till I die. Now you can't justify killing a heart that is beating. It's murder. PERIOD. I don't care what five people say with robes on.
a heart = a person? that's nuts and you know it.

A person who's brain has stopped working can be hitched up to a heart/lung machine
 

Forum List

Back
Top