How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

[Rustic]

Trump & Putin. Yes, It's Really a Thing

Bad source

You're just another fucking dummy. Aren't you embarrassed for people to know how superficial, unsubstantial, and dim witted you are? You should be.....it's a real problem for you.

You still haven't explained your bad source

 

[Liminal]

Trump & Putin. Yes, It's Really a Thing

Bad source

You're just another fucking dummy. Aren't you embarrassed for people to know how superficial, unsubstantial, and dim witted you are? You should be.....it's a real problem for you.

You still haven't explained your bad source

You've done nothing to refute the credibility of the source. Are you just too fucking stupid to understand how that works?

 

[Rustic]

Why would Putin want Trump to win, Tonto? Is this just more Redskin idiocy?

Are you really this fucking stupid? Why does a dummy like you even bother posting?

So you don't know either?

Stay tuned for the upcoming revelations about Trump's close business ties with Putin and Co.

You sound pussy whipped...

Your mother never complained.

 

[Rustic]

Trump & Putin. Yes, It's Really a Thing

Bad source

You're just another fucking dummy. Aren't you embarrassed for people to know how superficial, unsubstantial, and dim witted you are? You should be.....it's a real problem for you.

You still haven't explained your bad source

You've done nothing to refute the credibility of the source. Are you just too fucking stupid to understand how that works?

 

[Liminal]

Looks like I lost another bet. I never could have guessed that you were this stupid.

 

[kaz]

Why would Putin want Trump to win, Tonto? Is this just more Redskin idiocy?

Are you really this fucking stupid? Why does a dummy like you even bother posting?

So you don't know either?

Stay tuned for the upcoming revelations about Trump's close business ties with Putin and Co.

I see, so I'm "fucking stupid" because I didn't know about your conspiracy theory. Wow, you're fucking stupid

Read something once in while....try reading. Then you might not sound so stupid.

What conspiracy sites do you prefer?

 

[deltex1]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Putin would love Hillary as President. He out maneuvered her when she was Sec State...and I'm sure he thinks she will be no challenge as president.

 

[jillian]

YOU fucking LIB Hillary ass likers are the ones who still believe 'Big Mike' wasn't rushing the cop when the cop shot the sub-human scum violent vermin.

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

I will tell you what I tell the radical righties.... you are too far out of the mainstream to know what left of center is. that is where most of the country is.... the country is not where you are.

and, frankly, I'm not really interested in that discussion because dumb Donald as president is too bizarre for words. I don't vote for bigoted fascistic misogynists. so I'm not going to throw away my vote because dumb Donald finds it in his interests to try to obstruct party unity like ted cruz did to him.

as of right now, about 80% to 85% of Bernie people are on the Hillary train. that's better than the percentage of Hillary people supporting Obama at this time eight years ago.

 

[jillian]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Why would Putin want Trump to win, Tonto? Is this just more Redskin idiocy?

dumb Donald loves putin.... that's why.

 

[jillian]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Putin would love Hillary as President. He out maneuvered her when she was Sec State...and I'm sure he thinks she will be no challenge as president.

I'm sure that's true in rightwingnuthackworld where you hate your country so much that you like someone who praises putin and kim jong un

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Lakhota and his fellow idiotic liberals fail to admit that if Hillary and the DNC hadn't done anything wrong, nothing would have been found on the servers to begin with.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Putin would love Hillary as President. He out maneuvered her when she was Sec State...and I'm sure he thinks she will be no challenge as president.

I'm sure that's true in rightwingnuthackworld where you hate your country so much that you like someone who praises putin and kim jong un

People don't hate their country simply because they disagree with you wing nut.

 

[kaz]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Why would Putin want Trump to win, Tonto? Is this just more Redskin idiocy?

dumb Donald loves putin.... that's why.

You got anything not pulled out of your ass?

 

[Liminal]

Are you really this fucking stupid? Why does a dummy like you even bother posting?

So you don't know either?

Stay tuned for the upcoming revelations about Trump's close business ties with Putin and Co.

I see, so I'm "fucking stupid" because I didn't know about your conspiracy theory. Wow, you're fucking stupid

Read something once in while....try reading. Then you might not sound so stupid.

What conspiracy sites do you prefer?

Again, nothing from any of you dummies to actually refute anything. Exactly how fucking stupid are you people?

 

[Fair&Balanced]

What lakhota and the other idiots are trying to pull here is akin to if your younger son read your daughter's diary and then told on her b/c she wrote in it that she had started smoking and your daughter started cursing that it was her brother's fault she got in trouble.

 

[Liminal]

YOU fucking LIB Hillary ass likers are the ones who still believe 'Big Mike' wasn't rushing the cop when the cop shot the sub-human scum violent vermin.

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

I will tell you what I tell the radical righties.... you are too far out of the mainstream to know what left of center is. that is where most of the country is.... the country is not where you are.

and, frankly, I'm not really interested in that discussion because dumb Donald as president is too bizarre for words. I don't vote for bigoted fascistic misogynists. so I'm not going to throw away my vote because dumb Donald finds it in his interests to try to obstruct party unity like ted cruz did to him.

as of right now, about 80% to 85% of Bernie people are on the Hillary train. that's better than the percentage of Hillary people supporting Obama at this time eight years ago.

I'd love to see the source for your phoney unsubstantiated numbers.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

YOU fucking LIB Hillary ass likers are the ones who still believe 'Big Mike' wasn't rushing the cop when the cop shot the sub-human scum violent vermin.

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

I will tell you what I tell the radical righties.... you are too far out of the mainstream to know what left of center is. that is where most of the country is.... the country is not where you are.

and, frankly, I'm not really interested in that discussion because dumb Donald as president is too bizarre for words. I don't vote for bigoted fascistic misogynists. so I'm not going to throw away my vote because dumb Donald finds it in his interests to try to obstruct party unity like ted cruz did to him.

as of right now, about 80% to 85% of Bernie people are on the Hillary train. that's better than the percentage of Hillary people supporting Obama at this time eight years ago.

LOL first of all, there are several major issues where Trump is actually left of Hillary and second of all, noway are 80% of Bernie supporters behind Hillary.

 

[jillian]

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

I will tell you what I tell the radical righties.... you are too far out of the mainstream to know what left of center is. that is where most of the country is.... the country is not where you are.

and, frankly, I'm not really interested in that discussion because dumb Donald as president is too bizarre for words. I don't vote for bigoted fascistic misogynists. so I'm not going to throw away my vote because dumb Donald finds it in his interests to try to obstruct party unity like ted cruz did to him.

as of right now, about 80% to 85% of Bernie people are on the Hillary train. that's better than the percentage of Hillary people supporting Obama at this time eight years ago.

I'd love to see the source for your phoney unsubstantiated numbers.

I love concern trolls like you.

go vote for dumb Donald.


pssst;...... this rightwing rag said 22% of Bernie voters were voting trump. that means everyone else is going to vote the party nominee no matter what. that's about 80%. and I'm pretty sure a good number of those "Bernie people" were rightwingers trying to skew the primaries by giving dumb Donald a candidate he could beat more easily. (which is why Bernie never won in closed primary states and mostly won in caucus states where college kids had a lot more time to hang out than adults did).

22% of Bernie Sanders Supporters to Vote Trump

you have to be a moron to be Bernie or bust at this point.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

I will tell you what I tell the radical righties.... you are too far out of the mainstream to know what left of center is. that is where most of the country is.... the country is not where you are.

and, frankly, I'm not really interested in that discussion because dumb Donald as president is too bizarre for words. I don't vote for bigoted fascistic misogynists. so I'm not going to throw away my vote because dumb Donald finds it in his interests to try to obstruct party unity like ted cruz did to him.

as of right now, about 80% to 85% of Bernie people are on the Hillary train. that's better than the percentage of Hillary people supporting Obama at this time eight years ago.

I'd love to see the source for your phoney unsubstantiated numbers.

I love concern trolls like you.

go vote for dumb Donald.


pssst;...... this rightwing rag said 22% of Bernie voters were voting trump. that means everyone else is going to vote the party nominee no matter what. that's about 80%. and I'm pretty sure a good number of those "Bernie people" were rightwingers trying to skew the primaries by giving dumb Donald a candidate he could beat more easily. (which is why Bernie never won in closed primary states and mostly won in caucus states where college kids had a lot more time to hang out than adults did).

22% of Bernie Sanders Supporters to Vote Trump

you have to be a moron to be Bernie or bust at this point.

OMG you are stupid. IF 22% of Bernie supporters vote for Trump , that doesn't mean the other 78% are definitely voting for Hillary. I actually bet more Bernie supporters just don't vote at all, then vote for both Hillary and Trump combined.

 

[jillian]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

thank you for your faux concern for the democratic party.


Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Lakhota and his fellow idiotic liberals fail to admit that if Hillary and the DNC hadn't done anything wrong, nothing would have been found on the servers to begin with.

thank you for your faux concern for the democratic party.