How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

[The Breeze]

No question at all. Hillary's private server was less secure than the computer or phone you're banging on right now. A number of tech experts have confirmed this.

The odds that her server wasn't hacked are 0%.

No, that's a delusional fairy tale that you just yanked out of your biutt.

What, you mean you actually believe it?

Oh my god. We've got a live one here! He actually believes the stories that his masters fed him about Clinton!

You know things are getting rough when they trot out mamooth to spin in the wind, too damn funny.

 

[mamooth]

Breeze, since you're jumping in, why don't you tell us how the election was rigged. Be specific, and back up your claims with evidence.

I'll understand if you run. I keep asking that question, and the Hillary-haters all run. It's what defines them.

You don't have to be neutered to be a Hillary-hater ... oh wait, you do. No human possessing gonads could act that way.

 

[dannyboys]

Breeze, since you're jumping in, why don't you tell us how the election was rigged. Be specific, and back up your claims with evidence.

I'll understand if you run. I keep asking that question, and the Hillary-haters all run. It's what defines them.

You don't have to be neutered to be a Hillary-hater ... oh wait, you do. No human possessing gonads could act that way.

Why did the "Ramen Noodle Head' resign?

 

[Liminal]

And you Trump followers are all just as fucking stupid as you can possibly be. In fact, you Trump dummies are such sad examples of humanity that you evidently have few reasons to continue living. Please draw the appropriate conclusions and act accordingly.

Take 2 aspirin and go to bed, I think you are having a Trump breakdown...lol

Trump is dogshit.........his followers are all dumber than dogshit.

 

[jillian]

YOU fucking LIB Hillary ass likers are the ones who still believe 'Big Mike' wasn't rushing the cop when the cop shot the sub-human scum violent vermin.

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

 

[jillian]

Breeze, since you're jumping in, why don't you tell us how the election was rigged. Be specific, and back up your claims with evidence.

I'll understand if you run. I keep asking that question, and the Hillary-haters all run. It's what defines them.

You don't have to be neutered to be a Hillary-hater ... oh wait, you do. No human possessing gonads could act that way.

Why did the "Ramen Noodle Head' resign?

to shut up you imbeciles. *shrug*

and take you out of the news cycle, idiota.

 

[Liminal]

YOU fucking LIB Hillary ass likers are the ones who still believe 'Big Mike' wasn't rushing the cop when the cop shot the sub-human scum violent vermin.

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

 

[Lakhota]

YOU fucking LIB Hillary ass likers are the ones who still believe 'Big Mike' wasn't rushing the cop when the cop shot the sub-human scum violent vermin.

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

Who are you voting for? Putin's puppet?

 

[hadit]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Let's first see this come from another source.

 

[Liminal]

YOU fucking LIB Hillary ass likers are the ones who still believe 'Big Mike' wasn't rushing the cop when the cop shot the sub-human scum violent vermin.

Calm down, little racist. This thread isn't about your racism. It's about your side lying about Clinton, and following the orders of yoru DearLeaderVlad.

Since you jumped in, why don't you spell out for us what the DNC supposedly did to Sanders.

I'm noticing a pattern. I keep asking the Hillary-haters to show what the DNC actually did, and none of those wusses will respond. They know they're all lying, but none of them is willing to break with the herd and admit it. Worst case of herd-mentality I've ever seen.

So if the DNC didn't do anything "wrong" why don't you explain why the 'Ramen Noodle Head' resigned?
Why don't you explain why Donna Brazile personally "apologized" to Sanders.
I'm sure you be able to explain it.
Putin and Trump are to blame right?

so you have a problem with curly hair, too, little boy?

at least it's not dumb Donald's pompadour. now go vote for your Orangeman like a good little bigoted misogynist who is clueless as to why no one but old white men like your candidate

Yes, by all means, vote for Hilary.....the other right wing candidate.

Who are you voting for? Putin's puppet?

No. It's because of my racist, sexist, misogynistic Sanders like opinions that I've decided to vote for Jill Stein.

 

[Wolfpack1]

I don't think Putin is part of Wikileaks. It's gone after him the past.

 

[hadit]

I can't wait for the russkies to release all of Hillary's State Department bathroom server classified data. If they hacked the Dems, a crude server in a bathroom should have been super easy to hack. It just a matter of timing for maximum effect...just wonder if the FBI gets the missing emails and data can it still be used to indict??

Of course it could. Double jeopardy doesn't apply since she was never tried.

 

[Liminal]

I don't think Putin is part of Wikileaks. It's gone after him the past.

He's not. The idiots in the corporate media are trying to conflate Assange with Snowden. I wonder if they could possibly be more obvious with their dishonesty?

 

[Wolfpack1]

I don't think Putin is part of Wikileaks. It's gone after him the past.

He's not. The idiots in the corporate media are trying to conflate Assange with Snowden. I wonder if they could possibly be more obvious with their dishonesty?

People want it both ways. If Wikileaks exposes their people for being very corrupt, they attack it. But if it exposes their rivals for being very corrupt, they celebrate it. These Wikileak Emails are very serious. They do expose the Democratic Party as being much more corrupt than most thought.

 

[Liminal]

I don't think Putin is part of Wikileaks. It's gone after him the past.

He's not. The idiots in the corporate media are trying to conflate Assange with Snowden. I wonder if they could possibly be more obvious with their dishonesty?

People want it both ways. If Wikileaks exposes their people for being very corrupt, they attack it. But if it exposes their rivals for being very corrupt, they celebrate it. These Wikileak Emails are very serious. They do expose the Democratic Party as being much more corrupt than most thought.

More corrupt than people thought? No, I don't think anyone is at all surprised by any of this.

 

[Lakhota]

FBI Investigates Hacking Of Democratic National Committee

Will the trail lead to Putin? We shall see...

 

[AnCap'n_Murica]

If we can rely on anyone to really get to the bottom of things, it's James Comey!

 

[Wolfpack1]

If we can rely on anyone to really get to the bottom of things, it's James Comey!

That is funny.

 

[Flopper]

Does not matter who owns the video camera that records you putting a knife in someone's back... As long as it is evidence to be used in the guilty party's prosecution...

Vladimir Putin: I think I mentioned our ”guilt“ in the floods in Europe. I think this is another such joke. Actually, I think it is indecent to mention Russia when speaking of any issue, even those we have nothing to do with, to make our country out to be some kind of scarecrow. This not what intelligent people would do, I think.

Meeting with heads of international news agencies

Strange is it not. Liberals point the blame to Russian's for knowing about liberal crimes. They have no proof the Russian's did it and no defense for what they did. But someone else MUST be guilty. It's the liberal way.

The question is what is the rational for leaking these emails at this time if it's not to help Trump?

What world are you living in that Assange would help Trump?

Assange, Wikileaks, Snowden, Russia.
It's more about creating distension. This goes back to the cold war. Anything the Russians can do to created dissension in the US, is good for Russia.

However, Trump's promise to ease tensions with Russia and compliments Putin and Trump have exchanged certainly indicate that Russia would not be unhappy with a Trump victory.

 

[Rustic]

Evidence suggests that a Russian intelligence group was the source of the most recent Wikileaks intel dump, which was aimed to influence the U.S. election.

Close your eyes and imagine that a hacking group backed by Russian President Vladimir Putin broke into the email system of a major U.S. political party. The group stole thousands of sensitive messages and then published them through an obliging third party in a way that was strategically timed to influence the United States presidential election. Now open your eyes, because that’s what just happened.

On Friday, Wikileaks published 20,000 emails stolen from the Democratic National Committee. They reveal, among other things,thuggish infighting, a push by a top DNC official to use Bernie Sanders’ religious convictions against him in the South, and attempts to strong-arm media outlets. In other words, they reveal the Washington campaign monster for what it is.

But leave aside the purported content of the Wikileaks data dump (to which numerous other outlets have devoted considerable attention) and consider the source. Considerable evidence shows that the Wikileaks dump was an orchestrated act by the Russian government, working through proxies, to undermine Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign.

“This has all the hallmarks of tradecraft. The only rationale to release such data from the Russian bulletproof host was to empower one candidate against another. The Cold War is alive and well,” Tom Kellermann, the CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures told Defense One.

Here’s the timeline: On June 14, cybersecurity company CrowdStrike, under contract with the DNC, announced in a blog post that two separate Russian intelligence groups had gained access to the DNC network. One group, FANCY BEAR or APT 28, gained access in April. The other, COZY BEAR, (also called Cozy Duke andAPT 29) first breached the network in the summer of 2015.

Cybersecurity company FireEye first discovered APT 29 in 2014 and was quick to point out a clear Kremlin connection. “We suspect the Russian government sponsors the group because of the organizations it targets and the data it steals. Additionally, APT 29 appeared to cease operations on Russian holidays, and their work hours seem to align with the UTC +3 time zone, which contains cities such as Moscow and St. Petersburg,” they wrote in their report on the group. Other U.S. officials have said that the group looks like it has sponsorship from the Russian government due in large part to the level of sophistication behind the group’s attacks.

It’s the same group that hit the State Department, the White House, and the civilian email of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.The group’s modus operandi (a spearphishing attack that uploads adistinctive remote access tool on the target’s computer) is well known to cyber-security researchers.

In his blog post on the DNC breaches CrowdStrike’s CTO Dmitri Alperovitchwrote “We’ve had lots of experience with both of these actors attempting to target our customers in the past and know them well. In fact, our team considers them some of the best adversaries out of all the numerous nation-state, criminal and hacktivist/terrorist groups we encounter on a daily basis. Their tradecraft is superb, operational security second to none and the extensive usage of ‘living-off-the-land’ techniques enables them to easily bypass many security solutions they encounter.”

The next day, an individual calling himself Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the culprit behind the breach and released key documents to back up the claim, writing: “Shame on CrowdStrike.”

More: How Putin Weaponized Wikileaks to Influence the Election of an American President

One would hope that most Americans would be smart enough not to take Putin's bait. We'll see...

Washington redskin is making shit up again, Putin is harmless. Lol