How the brexiteers echo the Nazis

[Phoenall]

Nigel Farage to march on Supreme Court alongside 100,000 others as Brexit appeal starts
And so it goes on.
Naked intimidation of the judiciary by modern day stormtroopers. .

Isn't this what your neo nazis and neo marxists do when the laws go against them, but now others are making a peaceful protest it is wrong. So what do you do but invoke godswins law once again as you have no other ammunition to fire. I didnt see you complaining about the muslim lord when he threatened to have 700,000 armed extremists invade and take control of the house's of Parliament

 

[Phoenall]

Nigel Farage to march on Supreme Court alongside 100,000 others as Brexit appeal starts
And so it goes on.
Naked intimidation of the judiciary by modern day stormtroopers. .

Both Theresa May's appeal to the Supreme Court and the Farage march are grandstanding. The Brexiteers have no case and Farage, trying to keep in the limelight, has jumped the Trump sinking ship.

And when the case is proven in Brexit's favour what will you say then. You have enough problems understanding your own nations laws, so what chance do you stand with the UK's. You forget that the last court in the UK happens to be the current government, and after that it is the EU court of Justice

 

[Correll]

I thought the parliament needs to vote on brexit first. I don't understand.

The brexits want to cut parliament out of the process and give the PM sole discretion. The court has told them that they cant hence the squealing of pigs.

The referendum passed with a majority of the people voting for it.


What justification are the judges using to over rule The Right of Self Government by the UK people?

And being upset that a Judge is standing in the way of the Democratically expressed Will of the People is completely valid and just.

Its patently obvious that you dont have any understanding of the situation.

Listen up.

There was a small majority for brexit.

Brexit is triggered by invoking Article 50.

The government had stated that they would do this by March 2017.

Primarily because they needed this time to decide what terms they would seek.

The court has now said that parliament must have a say in the terms as it is not lawful for the government to go it alone.

We all had a vote on brexit but not one of the terms was voted on by the people.

Our representatives now have the chance to debate and decide this.

It is a complicated issue and I am not shocked that a thick fucker like you is struggling with it.

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The brexits want to cut parliament out of the process and give the PM sole discretion. The court has told them that they cant hence the squealing of pigs.

The referendum passed with a majority of the people voting for it.


What justification are the judges using to over rule The Right of Self Government by the UK people?

And being upset that a Judge is standing in the way of the Democratically expressed Will of the People is completely valid and just.

Its patently obvious that you dont have any understanding of the situation.

Listen up.

There was a small majority for brexit.

Brexit is triggered by invoking Article 50.

The government had stated that they would do this by March 2017.

Primarily because they needed this time to decide what terms they would seek.

The court has now said that parliament must have a say in the terms as it is not lawful for the government to go it alone.

We all had a vote on brexit but not one of the terms was voted on by the people.

Our representatives now have the chance to debate and decide this.

It is a complicated issue and I am not shocked that a thick fucker like you is struggling with it.

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

 

[westwall]

The referendum passed with a majority of the people voting for it.


What justification are the judges using to over rule The Right of Self Government by the UK people?

And being upset that a Judge is standing in the way of the Democratically expressed Will of the People is completely valid and just.

Its patently obvious that you dont have any understanding of the situation.

Listen up.

There was a small majority for brexit.

Brexit is triggered by invoking Article 50.

The government had stated that they would do this by March 2017.

Primarily because they needed this time to decide what terms they would seek.

The court has now said that parliament must have a say in the terms as it is not lawful for the government to go it alone.

We all had a vote on brexit but not one of the terms was voted on by the people.

Our representatives now have the chance to debate and decide this.

It is a complicated issue and I am not shocked that a thick fucker like you is struggling with it.

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

Oh? You going to go around and break some heads to make them change to your POV?

 

[xyz]

Nigel Farage to march on Supreme Court alongside 100,000 others as Brexit appeal starts
And so it goes on.
Naked intimidation of the judiciary by modern day stormtroopers. .

Isn't this what your neo nazis and neo marxists do when the laws go against them, but now others are making a peaceful protest it is wrong. So what do you do but invoke godswins law once again as you have no other ammunition to fire. I didnt see you complaining about the muslim lord when he threatened to have 700,000 armed extremists invade and take control of the house's of Parliament

Exactly, neo-Nazis support Brexit:

Europe's far-right unite in praise for UK's Brexit vote

British Neo-Nazis are on the March (and Fox News is eager to help)

This Brexit group targeted National Front supporters for votes on Facebook

Plus you're probably a neo-Nazi yourself Phoenall, why are you cutting yourself down and calling yourself a libtard?

 

[Correll]

The referendum passed with a majority of the people voting for it.


What justification are the judges using to over rule The Right of Self Government by the UK people?

And being upset that a Judge is standing in the way of the Democratically expressed Will of the People is completely valid and just.

Its patently obvious that you dont have any understanding of the situation.

Listen up.

There was a small majority for brexit.

Brexit is triggered by invoking Article 50.

The government had stated that they would do this by March 2017.

Primarily because they needed this time to decide what terms they would seek.

The court has now said that parliament must have a say in the terms as it is not lawful for the government to go it alone.

We all had a vote on brexit but not one of the terms was voted on by the people.

Our representatives now have the chance to debate and decide this.

It is a complicated issue and I am not shocked that a thick fucker like you is struggling with it.

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

What percentage would make it finished business? And does that work both ways?


What percentage of UK citizens voted to ENTER the EU?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR large scale muslim immigration?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR, political correctness so strong that it actively protected mass child rapists rather than risk giving "ammo" to the bnp?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The Brexit campaign may be prosecuted for lying to voters

The shit gets piled higher.

If only they had been truthful........................

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Its patently obvious that you dont have any understanding of the situation.

Listen up.

There was a small majority for brexit.

Brexit is triggered by invoking Article 50.

The government had stated that they would do this by March 2017.

Primarily because they needed this time to decide what terms they would seek.

The court has now said that parliament must have a say in the terms as it is not lawful for the government to go it alone.

We all had a vote on brexit but not one of the terms was voted on by the people.

Our representatives now have the chance to debate and decide this.

It is a complicated issue and I am not shocked that a thick fucker like you is struggling with it.

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

What percentage would make it finished business? And does that work both ways?


What percentage of UK citizens voted to ENTER the EU?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR large scale muslim immigration?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR, political correctness so strong that it actively protected mass child rapists rather than risk giving "ammo" to the bnp?

I think that 2/3 is a reasonable amount. A clear majority.

 

[Correll]

The Brexit campaign may be prosecuted for lying to voters

The shit gets piled higher.

If only they had been truthful........................

Wow. So, the political movement that challenges the political elite is being investigated with an eye to using the power of the state to shut them down and arrest them for their political activities and you celebrate that.


And you have the lack of self awareness to accuse your enemies of being nazis?

LOL!!!

Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip.

 

[Correll]

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

What percentage would make it finished business? And does that work both ways?


What percentage of UK citizens voted to ENTER the EU?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR large scale muslim immigration?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR, political correctness so strong that it actively protected mass child rapists rather than risk giving "ammo" to the bnp?

I think that 2/3 is a reasonable amount. A clear majority.

And when exactly did 2/3s of the UK vote for EU membership?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The Brexit campaign may be prosecuted for lying to voters

The shit gets piled higher.

If only they had been truthful........................

Wow. So, the political movement that challenges the political elite is being investigated with an eye to using the power of the state to shut them down and arrest them for their political activities and you celebrate that.


And you have the lack of self awareness to accuse your enemies of being nazis?

LOL!!!

Liberals: All the self awareness of a turnip.

They lied, there should be some come backs on that. i doubt that there will be but it does no harm to lay down a marker.

 

[HenryBHough]

Ryanair had laid on dozens of extra flights twixt Cardiff and Brussels in anticipation of hordes of failed "remainers" upping sticks in their blind panic. But all three decided they couldn't afford it so are cowering with their phablets under their wee little beds and wetting themselves in between wankings instead. It seems to give them as much pleasure as an "escape" to EUtopia might....

Ah well....Ryanair deserves a loss now and again.

 

[montelatici]

New Ryanair planes 'to be based outside of UK due to Brexit'

New Ryanair planes 'to be based outside of UK due to Brexit'

 

[Phoenall]

The referendum passed with a majority of the people voting for it.


What justification are the judges using to over rule The Right of Self Government by the UK people?

And being upset that a Judge is standing in the way of the Democratically expressed Will of the People is completely valid and just.

Its patently obvious that you dont have any understanding of the situation.

Listen up.

There was a small majority for brexit.

Brexit is triggered by invoking Article 50.

The government had stated that they would do this by March 2017.

Primarily because they needed this time to decide what terms they would seek.

The court has now said that parliament must have a say in the terms as it is not lawful for the government to go it alone.

We all had a vote on brexit but not one of the terms was voted on by the people.

Our representatives now have the chance to debate and decide this.

It is a complicated issue and I am not shocked that a thick fucker like you is struggling with it.

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

If it was the other way round you would be shouting from the rooftops that you won. The margin is irrelevant as it is the fact the majority voted against staying in the EU. YOU LOST GET OVER IT AND STOP CRYING LIKE A BABY

 

[Phoenall]

Nigel Farage to march on Supreme Court alongside 100,000 others as Brexit appeal starts
And so it goes on.
Naked intimidation of the judiciary by modern day stormtroopers. .

Isn't this what your neo nazis and neo marxists do when the laws go against them, but now others are making a peaceful protest it is wrong. So what do you do but invoke godswins law once again as you have no other ammunition to fire. I didnt see you complaining about the muslim lord when he threatened to have 700,000 armed extremists invade and take control of the house's of Parliament

Exactly, neo-Nazis support Brexit:

Europe's far-right unite in praise for UK's Brexit vote

British Neo-Nazis are on the March (and Fox News is eager to help)

This Brexit group targeted National Front supporters for votes on Facebook

Plus you're probably a neo-Nazi yourself Phoenall, why are you cutting yourself down and calling yourself a libtard?

Because I am not. I see what the EU is doing better than most people and I dont like watching people who have worked hard all their lives being shit on by the likes of you. Forced into paying extra taxes on our heating and cooking so that France and Germany can enjoy cheaper bills. Forced into taking in millions of unemployable Europeans and pay them welfare while seeing our own refused it. Forced into treating people for free in our already overburdened NHS that is on the point of going bust. Forced into accepting unethical and illegal practises because that is how it is done in Europe. Forced to buy tasteless food because the crops grow better in Europe and give better yields

 

[Phoenall]

The Brexit campaign may be prosecuted for lying to voters

The shit gets piled higher.

If only they had been truthful........................

The evidence has shown that project fear are the ones who have consistently LIED to force the people into staying in the EU, all because the rich fat cats knew leaving would cut their profits and make it harder to move to Europe. That is the power behind behind the remain camp, those who have holiday homes in Europe and dont want to pay for a visa every other month when they flit out .


You have a 100% record of LYING on Brexit, and still you try it on

 

[Phoenall]

There was a MAJORITY, meaning that your side could not muster enough votes and so lost. If the majority was 1 it would still be the will of the people. You cant have a do over or best of 3 because you lost a fair vote, the result stands and it was a remit to the government to start the process of leaving the EU. Just because you will lose personally by leaving the EU are not sufficient grounds to scrap the vote and stay. The fact is we in Britain were being suffocated by EU rules and laws that meant we could not control our borders or our welfare, leaving us in debt and struggling to cope. Watching as our heavy industry was decimated and the lucrative orders going to mainland Europe.

So complicated that project fear cant see that they are clamouring for total control by faceless unelected eurocrats in Brussels telling them when they can breathe, eat, go to the toilet and procreate

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

What percentage would make it finished business? And does that work both ways?


What percentage of UK citizens voted to ENTER the EU?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR large scale muslim immigration?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR, political correctness so strong that it actively protected mass child rapists rather than risk giving "ammo" to the bnp?

I think that 2/3 is a reasonable amount. A clear majority.

Just as clear as 1% which is again a clear majority.

If 2/3rds is required then it is not a democratic vote is it , but a neo marxist rigged vote

 

[Phoenall]

New Ryanair planes 'to be based outside of UK due to Brexit'

New Ryanair planes 'to be based outside of UK due to Brexit'

Then they wont attract the bonuses given to UK companies that stay and weather the storm will they. That will give them something else to whinge about as they put up prices and sack more people

 

[Phoenall]

51.9 is not a ringing endorsement and a second referendum should be called at some point.

Keep having votes until you get a result you like.


And no matter how thin the margin is on that vote, that's the last one.

51.9 / 48.1 is not a decisive mandate for such a huge decision.
It isnt finished, in fact it is far from finished business.

What percentage would make it finished business? And does that work both ways?


What percentage of UK citizens voted to ENTER the EU?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR large scale muslim immigration?

What percentage of UK citizens voted FOR, political correctness so strong that it actively protected mass child rapists rather than risk giving "ammo" to the bnp?

I think that 2/3 is a reasonable amount. A clear majority.

And when exactly did 2/3s of the UK vote for EU membership?

They didnt even get that in 1975, when the first referendum was held, so can we claim that was faked as well and this latest is the re-run of that vote ?