How the Democrats rigged the 2020 election

In other words Sean Hannity told them trump would win.
Polls said that Hillary was going to win in 2016. But when she lost, democrats stepped back, and tried to figure out why they lost.

In 2020 Trump was supposed to win, but when he lost republicans denied reality and insisted Trump actually won in 2020. If only they could prove how.
He did win.
:itsok:
Does not work. There was massive and obvious fraud and it is going to be proven.
 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

Biased. Politifact and poynter institute. Might as well quote the Washington Post, NY Times and Huffington Post.
 
The establishment of both parties couldn't let Trump stay in power because he was preventing them from their robbery as usual method of governance. They couldn't stand the fact that an unlimited amount of money was there for the taking and Trump was forcing them to be honest. Stealing the election was their only salvation. In addition to the easy money, there were also large numbers of DOJ people who stood a good chance of ending up in jail if Trump was reelected. The stolen election was a big part of the DOJ criminal coverup.
Trump was doing the robbing.
 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

Biased. Politifact and poynter institute. Might as well quote the Washington Post, NY Times and Huffington Post.
Those are highly credible sources.
 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

Biased. Politifact and poynter institute. Might as well quote the Washington Post, NY Times and Huffington Post.
They have lost all credibility. Why do people believe people that lied to to them for 4+ years? It does not say much about their intelligence.
 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

Biased. Politifact and poynter institute. Might as well quote the Washington Post, NY Times and Huffington Post.
Those are highly credible sources.
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

Biased. Politifact and poynter institute. Might as well quote the Washington Post, NY Times and Huffington Post.
They have lost all credibility. Why do people believe people that lied to to them for 4+ years? It does not say much about their intelligence.
Agree...for 4 years Trump lied to you.

'nuff said.
 
I imagine it would take years to cross check very name to see if they voted more than one time or check records to see if the people even existed. Democrats know it and that's what they are counting on.
 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

Biased. Politifact and poynter institute. Might as well quote the Washington Post, NY Times and Huffington Post.
Those are highly credible sources.
Highly leftist propaganda.
 
Because when Florida ran such a voter purge, they found that over 10,000 legitimate voters had been "purged". Because the criteria didn't require an exact match, and people with similar names were purged.

One example was a florida reverend, who had the same first and last name (different middle name) of a convicted felon. And his name was purged.
Do you have a link to that story?

Start here, more to come

Biased. Politifact and poynter institute. Might as well quote the Washington Post, NY Times and Huffington Post.
They have lost all credibility. Why do people believe people that lied to to them for 4+ years? It does not say much about their intelligence.
Agree...for 4 years Trump lied to you.

'nuff said.
Not what I said, but the troll response was precious.
 
This is a serious thread, opened (and hopefully kept) in the Clean Debate Zone so that we can have some serious and thoughtful clarity on this whole controversy.

Obviously this is a complicated topic, but what I'm after here is focus, clarity, and conciseness. Your shortest, clearest, most succinct responses.

From what I'm reading, seeing and hearing, this is what Trump supporters believe happened before, during and after the 2020 elections, in three parts:

1. Fearing that President Donald Trump would win re-election in 2020, the Democrats approached and worked with the Chinese government to release a deadly virus that would disrupt the 2020 American election process and provide an excuse for the Democrats to revise/ease voting requirements. These looser requirements would provide the cover they needed to (among other things) insert doctored ballots (some of which may have been doctored by the Chinese themselves), hide/destroy ballots, and count legal ballots multiple times. Dr Anthony Fauci, a key member of the government's health system, was recruited to spread false and misleading information to the public and advance this effort.

2. A large number of individuals and organizations successfully pulled off the fraud, either working in concert or alone. Providing cover and aid in this endeavor were China, the American major media, American local media, the Democratic Party, SmartMatic and Dominion Software.

3. Once the fraud was detected, the following individuals and groups purposely and actively participated in its coverup in some way, either through dishonesty or the refusal to examine the clear and voluminous evidence of fraud that was provided: The US Supreme Court, Trump-appointed judges, GOP state election officials, GOP governors, GOP state legislatures, the FBI, the CIA, Trump's Justice Department, Trump's Attorney General, Vice President Mike Pence, the Democratic Party, the American major media and Republican congresspeople. To date, these individuals and groups have been successful in holding off the exposure of the evidence.

As I understand it, that is the issue, in a nutshell, as succinct as I can make it.

Is this fair and accurate? Please comment and make your best effort to keep this focused, clear and concise.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
 
Look at Barr, Wray and Krebs. Why would anyone think that the Republican Establishment wanted a legitimate election?
Yes! Let’s do that! Let’s take a look at Chris Krebs. He claimed the elections were “the most secure in US history” on 60 Minutes.

The Epoch Times is not a credible source for anything. You need a REAL source.

 
This is a serious thread, opened (and hopefully kept) in the Clean Debate Zone so that we can have some serious and thoughtful clarity on this whole controversy.

Obviously this is a complicated topic, but what I'm after here is focus, clarity, and conciseness. Your shortest, clearest, most succinct responses.

From what I'm reading, seeing and hearing, this is what Trump supporters believe happened before, during and after the 2020 elections, in three parts:

1. Fearing that President Donald Trump would win re-election in 2020, the Democrats approached and worked with the Chinese government to release a deadly virus that would disrupt the 2020 American election process and provide an excuse for the Democrats to revise/ease voting requirements. These looser requirements would provide the cover they needed to (among other things) insert doctored ballots (some of which may have been doctored by the Chinese themselves), hide/destroy ballots, and count legal ballots multiple times. Dr Anthony Fauci, a key member of the government's health system, was recruited to spread false and misleading information to the public and advance this effort.

2. A large number of individuals and organizations successfully pulled off the fraud, either working in concert or alone. Providing cover and aid in this endeavor were China, the American major media, American local media, the Democratic Party, SmartMatic and Dominion Software.

3. Once the fraud was detected, the following individuals and groups purposely and actively participated in its coverup in some way, either through dishonesty or the refusal to examine the clear and voluminous evidence of fraud that was provided: The US Supreme Court, Trump-appointed judges, GOP state election officials, GOP governors, GOP state legislatures, the FBI, the CIA, Trump's Justice Department, Trump's Attorney General, Vice President Mike Pence, the Democratic Party, the American major media and Republican congresspeople. To date, these individuals and groups have been successful in holding off the exposure of the evidence.

As I understand it, that is the issue, in a nutshell, as succinct as I can make it.

Is this fair and accurate? Please comment and make your best effort to keep this focused, clear and concise.
Sure, pal! The Dems in concert with China released the virus & stole the election from Trump & only Trump but didn't dare fuck with Mitch & Lindsey, or a number of other Republican candidates! Thanks for confirming my suspicions again that you guys need some serious therapy.
 
Look at Barr, Wray and Krebs. Why would anyone think that the Republican Establishment wanted a legitimate election?
Yes! Let’s do that! Let’s take a look at Chris Krebs. He claimed the elections were “the most secure in US history” on 60 Minutes.

The Epoch Times is not a credible source for anything. You need a REAL source.

It is the Fact checkers that have no credibility. They have been exposed as bought and paid for.
 
Look at Barr, Wray and Krebs. Why would anyone think that the Republican Establishment wanted a legitimate election?
Yes! Let’s do that! Let’s take a look at Chris Krebs. He claimed the elections were “the most secure in US history” on 60 Minutes.

The Epoch Times is not a credible source for anything. You need a REAL source.

It is the Fact checkers that have no credibility. They have been exposed as bought and paid for.
Wrong.
 

Forum List

Back
Top