Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like Prohibition, the War on Drugs, asset forfeiture, mandated sentences, etc.
Hahaha…poor example….just another non-compliant leftist loon that can’t follow simple instructions.
Don’t comply….get your ass beat, it’s just that simple.
Yep, I read it.
The problem is, right, that if it's illegal to film within 8 feet, all the officer has to do is to get withing that range of the person who is filming, in order to make their filming illegal.
Think about it.
If you want to make a law, make it a law about interfering in police work. Not the filming.
All the filmer has to do is back up and maintain his distance. There are already laws against interfering with police. Aggressive bystanders are often arrested for that.Yep, I read it.
The problem is, right, that if it's illegal to film within 8 feet, all the officer has to do is to get withing that range of the person who is filming, in order to make their filming illegal.
Think about it.
If you want to make a law, make it a law about interfering in police work. Not the filming.
No, that's wrong. The law has an explicitly exception for situations like that.
The law excludes personal recordings from the ban.That means you can't film your own interaction with the police even though, if they choose, if they don't intentionally (or "accidentally") turn it off, they can film you. Weird.
They should hang.An exception that will be ignored or bypassed somehow.
It is obvious these police should be prosecuted, but they won't be.
‘Eight feet’ becomes eight yards – whatever LEO determines.You can step back two feet and still capture everything they are doing.
Do you think the video the young woman captured of Chauvin would have shown him in a better light of taken from a step back?
You get that not one of those things you mention were created by police, right?
If you have a problem with laws that police enforce (many police do) then I suggest you go to the person who created those laws. The legislators who YOU elected.
She WAS MENTALLY ILL, you fucking Gestapo thug.
The police can easily just explain the law to voters and prevent abuses like this.
All the filmer has to do is back up and maintain his distance. There are already laws against interfering with police. Aggressive bystanders are often arrested for that.
ignorant of and intimidated by the law, private citizens will refrain from recording at all to be safe, as intended by Republican lawmakers.
A person with mental illness can be detained by police if they are an imminent threat to themselves or others. They won't be charged with a crime, they will be detained until they can be evaluated by a mental health professional which... in most cities ... means taking them to an emergency room where police will sit with them for hours until they can be seen by a mental health practitioner (almost never a doctor) who will spend five minutes with them and release them.
Except in this case the woman who are not at all threatening in anyway
There have always been bad cops.
They were cops responsible for most of the lynchings of civil rights advocates in the 60s.
We just could never prove it so easily before.
The whole role of police is inherently corrupting, so even those intent on good, end up only doing evil.
Like Prohibition, the War on Drugs, asset forfeiture, mandated sentences, etc.
Because you say so or because you have data to share?Because it was easier to cover for them, and they could quietly murder anyone who they thought was a threat to them.
{...
Alan Chen, a law professor at the University of Denver, said there were several outstanding questions about the law’s enforcement, including how people should respond if an officer moves toward them even though they were recording from more than eight feet away.
“It might deter them from actually recording or might make them back up even further than the eight feet that the law requires,” Mr. Chen said. “There’s certainly some First Amendment concerns here.”
...}
Arizona Law Bans People From Recording Police Within Eight Feet (Published 2022)
Civil rights and news media organizations have objected to the law, which is set to go into effect in September, as a violation of free speech protections.www.nytimes.com
You don't sound like you need it explained to you. Its up to you and your friends to go out and vote the people who write these laws out of office.
Don't blame police if you don't like the law. Police don't write the laws.
Cool…don’t comply and get your ass beat then…I’m fine with that. Meanwhile, I’ll comply, I won’t pull my cell phone out and I’ll smile and laugh with the cop.No one should ever comply with illegal dictates.
The police were entirely in violation of the law.
Hahaha….right! Everybody is “mentally ill” says the leftist freaks.She WAS MENTALLY ILL, you fucking Gestapo thug.
