Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a second longer than I spent in Afghanistan, Trump.Ever spent any time in a communist country, dumbrade?
https://www.quora.com/How-many-peop...=uad_mkt_en_acq_us_awin&set=awin&pub_id=78888
"During the war in Afghanistan (2001–present), over 31,000 civilian deaths due to war-related violence have been documented; 29,900 civilians have been wounded.
"Over 111,000 Afghans, including civilians, soldiers and militants, are estimated to have been killed in the conflict."
More MAGA
Were you trying to say “no”? Lack the sack to just say so? Your attempt at deflection is as failed as your blood-thirsty, inhuman ideology, doucherade.
Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...Congratulations.Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...
You spelled "Scholar" correctly.
What do you take seriously, shareholder privilege?You wannabe communist idiots are hilariously accurate manifestations of insanity. Like all truly crazy people, you take yourselves oh-so-seriously.
The Divine Right of Capital by Marjorie Kelly: A Summary
"Today, our worldview has a bias – that stockholders are to be paid as much as possible, while employees are to be paid as little as possible. 'Income for one group is declared good, and income for another group is declared bad.'
"Nowhere is this more clear than in our financial statements.
"Here’s the basic formula you’ll find on financial statements:
"Capital Income + Retained earnings = Revenue – (Employee income + Cost of materials)
"Kelly uses some simple algebra to show that this formula could just as easily be re-written as:
"Employee income + Retained earnings = Revenue – (Capital income + Cost of materials)"
"Kelly uses some simple algebra to show that this formula could just as easily be re-written as:
"Employee income + Retained earnings = Revenue – (Capital income + Cost of materials)"
Is "employee income" magically higher because Kelly used simple algebra to move it to the other side of the formula?
Are employees corporate assets or liabilities?Is "employee income" magically higher because Kelly used simple algebra to move it to the other side of the formula?
What do you take seriously, shareholder privilege?You wannabe communist idiots are hilariously accurate manifestations of insanity. Like all truly crazy people, you take yourselves oh-so-seriously.
The Divine Right of Capital by Marjorie Kelly: A Summary
"Today, our worldview has a bias – that stockholders are to be paid as much as possible, while employees are to be paid as little as possible. 'Income for one group is declared good, and income for another group is declared bad.'
"Nowhere is this more clear than in our financial statements.
"Here’s the basic formula you’ll find on financial statements:
"Capital Income + Retained earnings = Revenue – (Employee income + Cost of materials)
"Kelly uses some simple algebra to show that this formula could just as easily be re-written as:
"Employee income + Retained earnings = Revenue – (Capital income + Cost of materials)"
"Kelly uses some simple algebra to show that this formula could just as easily be re-written as:
"Employee income + Retained earnings = Revenue – (Capital income + Cost of materials)"
Is "employee income" magically higher because Kelly used simple algebra to move it to the other side of the formula?Are employees corporate assets or liabilities?Is "employee income" magically higher because Kelly used simple algebra to move it to the other side of the formula?
Employee income+Retained earnings =
Revenue-(Capital income + Cost of materials).
Isn't it more logical to lump capital providers with material providers?
The people in your silly claim aren't dying because of capitalism.Can't find a way to profit from their deaths?The people in your silly claim aren't dying because of capitalism.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-peop...=uad_mkt_en_acq_us_awin&set=awin&pub_id=78888
"Unemployment causes 45,000 suicides a year worldwide, finds study
"New Study on Rising Suicide Rates in the US Suggests Capitalism Is Quite Literally Killing Americans[4]
"The reason is that competition and the rat race are tearing people apart, causing depression and hopelessness."
No depression and hopelessness in Venezuela, eh?
No capitalistic sanctions involved, right?No depression and hopelessness in Venezuela, eh?
The people in your silly claim aren't dying because of capitalism.Can't find a way to profit from their deaths?The people in your silly claim aren't dying because of capitalism.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-peop...=uad_mkt_en_acq_us_awin&set=awin&pub_id=78888
"Unemployment causes 45,000 suicides a year worldwide, finds study
"New Study on Rising Suicide Rates in the US Suggests Capitalism Is Quite Literally Killing Americans[4]
"The reason is that competition and the rat race are tearing people apart, causing depression and hopelessness."
No depression and hopelessness in Venezuela, eh?No capitalistic sanctions involved, right?No depression and hopelessness in Venezuela, eh?
Trump’s Economic Sanctions Have Cost Venezuela About $6bn Since August 2017
Not a second longer than I spent in Afghanistan, Trump.Ever spent any time in a communist country, dumbrade?
https://www.quora.com/How-many-peop...=uad_mkt_en_acq_us_awin&set=awin&pub_id=78888
"During the war in Afghanistan (2001–present), over 31,000 civilian deaths due to war-related violence have been documented; 29,900 civilians have been wounded.
"Over 111,000 Afghans, including civilians, soldiers and militants, are estimated to have been killed in the conflict."
More MAGA
Were you trying to say “no”? Lack the sack to just say so? Your attempt at deflection is as failed as your blood-thirsty, inhuman ideology, doucherade.
Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...Congratulations.Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...
You spelled "Scholar" correctly.
I guess he's got no path to 270 against Hillary, the most qualified candidate....ever. DURR
Good thing he was born rich.I guess he's got no path to 270 against Hillary, the most qualified candidate....ever. DURR
Using this income statement, corporations would maximize returns to employees in part by driving down capital income as low as possible. Sound good?Isn't it more logical to lump capital providers with material providers?
If that's what you want to do...….doesn't change reality.
If employees were a corporation's greatest asset, does that mean layoffs are wholesale destruction of assets as opposed to an elimination of expenses?
......
Congratulations.
You spelled "Scholar" correctly....
If employees were a corporation's greatest asset, does that mean layoffs are wholesale destruction of assets as opposed to an elimination of expenses?
How will the richest among us protect themselves and their property if (when?) catastrophic climate chaos makes money worthless?
MR Online | How the rich plan to rule a burning planet
"Writing in the Guardian in 2018, media theorist and futurist Douglas Rushkoff related his experience of being paid half his annual salary to speak at 'a super-deluxe private resort … on the subject of "the future of technology’”. He was expecting a room full of investment bankers. When he arrived, however, he was introduced to 'five super-wealthy guys … from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world'. Rushkoff wrote:
"'After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology.
"They had come with questions of their own … Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? … Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: "How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?"
"The Event.
"That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down … They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs.
"But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless?
"What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader?
"The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew.
"Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for survival."
If your plan calls for allowing the world to drown in the swamp of mass death and destruction while you cower in a South Pacific bunker protected by hired killers wearing exploding collars, you are not likely to win much in the way of public support for the capitalist state economics that are creating the next mass extinction, are you?
Not a second longer than I spent in Afghanistan, Trump.Ever spent any time in a communist country, dumbrade?
https://www.quora.com/How-many-peop...=uad_mkt_en_acq_us_awin&set=awin&pub_id=78888
"During the war in Afghanistan (2001–present), over 31,000 civilian deaths due to war-related violence have been documented; 29,900 civilians have been wounded.
"Over 111,000 Afghans, including civilians, soldiers and militants, are estimated to have been killed in the conflict."
More MAGA
Were you trying to say “no”? Lack the sack to just say so? Your attempt at deflection is as failed as your blood-thirsty, inhuman ideology, doucherade.
Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...Congratulations.Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...
You spelled "Scholar" correctly.
I guess he's got no path to 270 against Hillary, the most qualified candidate....ever. DURRGood thing he was born rich.I guess he's got no path to 270 against Hillary, the most qualified candidate....ever. DURR
Using this income statement, corporations would maximize returns to employees in part by driving down capital income as low as possible. Sound good?Isn't it more logical to lump capital providers with material providers?
If that's what you want to do...….doesn't change reality.
Employee income + Retained earnings =
Revenue - (Capital income + Cost of materials)
Where's the gun?I bought a safe for my valuables, luckily Fallout taught me exactly what to put in it for the end of the world...
View attachment 297449
Not a second longer than I spent in Afghanistan, Trump.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-peop...=uad_mkt_en_acq_us_awin&set=awin&pub_id=78888
"During the war in Afghanistan (2001–present), over 31,000 civilian deaths due to war-related violence have been documented; 29,900 civilians have been wounded.
"Over 111,000 Afghans, including civilians, soldiers and militants, are estimated to have been killed in the conflict."
More MAGA
Were you trying to say “no”? Lack the sack to just say so? Your attempt at deflection is as failed as your blood-thirsty, inhuman ideology, doucherade.
Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...Congratulations.Oh, and about your ‘source’...
What a scholar...
You spelled "Scholar" correctly.
I guess he's got no path to 270 against Hillary, the most qualified candidate....ever. DURRGood thing he was born rich.I guess he's got no path to 270 against Hillary, the most qualified candidate....ever. DURR
Yup, the rich guy spent half as much and still beat Hillary.
Lost by 3 million votes, remember?Yup, the rich guy spent half as much and still beat Hillary.
Where's the gun?I bought a safe for my valuables, luckily Fallout taught me exactly what to put in it for the end of the world...
View attachment 297449
If employees were a corporation's greatest asset, does that mean layoffs are wholesale destruction of assets as opposed to an elimination of expenses?
Any business that isn't in business to make money, isn't in business long.
If you don't want to be an employee ... then become an employer. Sponging off the productive members of society isn't (or at least shouldn't) be an option.
Are those who make money from money sponging off productive members of society?f you don't want to be an employee ... then become an employer. Sponging off the productive members of society isn't (or at least shouldn't) be an option.
