Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Have a link?
Hannity loses advertiser after pushing Seth Rich conspiracy theory
sponsors fined his lying ass ..
How does a sponsor fine someone they sponsor?
slow ain't cha sog ?
Nice non-answer. But, it's what you do.
IF I HAVE TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOU, YOU'RE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND IT .... GOMER.
We should have an investigation to see how much collusion is going on between certain sects of the media and the Democrat party. Seems to Me, that is a form of electioneering.
How about instead we get a message to al-Qaida that we wouldn't have a problem with them running a jetliner (preferably french) into the NY Times building?
I'd be more interested in the breakdown of the individual paychecks, but hey, the networks should have to open their books as well and account for all advertisement money versus 'other' funds received.We should have an investigation to see how much collusion is going on between certain sects of the media and the Democrat party. Seems to Me, that is a form of electioneering.
Probably accepted payment for broadcast time that assailed their opponent too. Damn that media.
I'd be more interested in the breakdown of the individual paychecks, but hey, the networks should have to open their books as well and account for all advertisement money versus 'other' funds received.We should have an investigation to see how much collusion is going on between certain sects of the media and the Democrat party. Seems to Me, that is a form of electioneering.
Probably accepted payment for broadcast time that assailed their opponent too. Damn that media.
What's that? Didn't you know that there was a difference between advertising and graft?
Let me start by saying I believe in freedom of speech. I do not believe in the media knowingly telling a lie to fit their agenda. They continually claim this information or that information has come from a source. I can even see why a source should not be exposed by them but when the accusation has been proven beyond any doubt to be false the media should be fined very heavy. For all we know their source could be their barber or even some homeless person living under a bridge. The media should be responsible for their many misstatements. This might scare them into looking more deeply into a particular thing before they try to destroy someone or at least check out the validity of their sources.
You might want to read this thing called New York Times v. Sullivan.Let me start by saying I believe in freedom of speech. I do not believe in the media knowingly telling a lie to fit their agenda. They continually claim this information or that information has come from a source. I can even see why a source should not be exposed by them but when the accusation has been proven beyond any doubt to be false the media should be fined very heavy. For all we know their source could be their barber or even some homeless person living under a bridge. The media should be responsible for their many misstatements. This might scare them into looking more deeply into a particular thing before they try to destroy someone or at least check out the validity of their sources.
Let me start by saying I believe in freedom of speech. I do not believe in the media knowingly telling a lie to fit their agenda. They continually claim this information or that information has come from a source. I can even see why a source should not be exposed by them but when the accusation has been proven beyond any doubt to be false the media should be fined very heavy. For all we know their source could be their barber or even some homeless person living under a bridge. The media should be responsible for their many misstatements. This might scare them into looking more deeply into a particular thing before they try to destroy someone or at least check out the validity of their sources.
Sean Hanity? Faux is no less faux than cnn or anybodyA better alternative to government sanctions by unnamed bureaucrats is an informed public. Consider that Fox is still the highest rated media source while the one time top dog media darling , CNN, has been reduced to a whiny radical arm of the extreme left wing. Democrats have been underestimating the intelligence of the American public for the last eight years and it cost them the presidency, both houses of congress, most governors and more than 3,000 state and local elections.The victory of a Trump supporting republican in Montana elected to congress in a special election yesterday flies in the face of constant left wing MSM propaganda and a barrage of fake news and it beats "huge fines" and government interference into the 1st Amendment freedom of the press. Let the liberal elites sort it out for themselves while they slide into bankruptcy.
Like I said yesterday, liar, I wrote it. If you like, you can try and find it. You won't unless it's under my name. Next lie, please.A link to his opinion? LOL!Have a link?
Regressive liberal ROE
1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.
2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect
3. Ignore any facts presented.
4. Ridicule spelling and typos, punctuation.
5. Attack the person as being juvenile, ie: "are you 12 years old", question their education, intelligence.
6. Employ misdirection,
6a. smear people
6b. attack religion
7. Lie, make false assumptions
8. Play race/gender card
9. Play gay/lesbian card
10. Play the Nazi/Fascist card
11. Make up stuff
12. Deny constantly
13. Reword and repeat
14. Pretending not to understand when they have been posting about it for days.
15. When losing, resort to personal attacks.
what RW blog did you c/p that from ?
yeah, riiiiiiiiiight, uhhuh, surrrrrrrrrrrrre ya did.
Let me start by saying I believe in freedom of speech. I do not believe in the media knowingly telling a lie to fit their agenda. They continually claim this information or that information has come from a source. I can even see why a source should not be exposed by them but when the accusation has been proven beyond any doubt to be false the media should be fined very heavy. For all we know their source could be their barber or even some homeless person living under a bridge. The media should be responsible for their many misstatements. This might scare them into looking more deeply into a particular thing before they try to destroy someone or at least check out the validity of their sources.
You want a link to someones opinion? LOL!A link to his opinion? LOL!Have a link?
Regressive liberal ROE
1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.
2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect
3. Ignore any facts presented.
4. Ridicule spelling and typos, punctuation.
5. Attack the person as being juvenile, ie: "are you 12 years old", question their education, intelligence.
6. Employ misdirection,
6a. smear people
6b. attack religion
7. Lie, make false assumptions
8. Play race/gender card
9. Play gay/lesbian card
10. Play the Nazi/Fascist card
11. Make up stuff
12. Deny constantly
13. Reword and repeat
14. Pretending not to understand when they have been posting about it for days.
15. When losing, resort to personal attacks.
How about a link to "Huge fines being placed on the media"?
My fault....I tend to read titles according to the English language
"Huge fines placed on media" implies it has happened
"Huge fines "should be" placed on media" implies an opinion
Next time I read a title I will remember that Conservatives struggle with the English language and reply accordingly
I can understand your frustration, but this just can't be done.Let me start by saying I believe in freedom of speech. I do not believe in the media knowingly telling a lie to fit their agenda. They continually claim this information or that information has come from a source. I can even see why a source should not be exposed by them but when the accusation has been proven beyond any doubt to be false the media should be fined very heavy. For all we know their source could be their barber or even some homeless person living under a bridge. The media should be responsible for their many misstatements. This might scare them into looking more deeply into a particular thing before they try to destroy someone or at least check out the validity of their sources.
We should have an investigation to see how much collusion is going on between certain sects of the media and the Democrat party. Seems to Me, that is a form of electioneering.
