HUGE: House Speaker McCarthy Handed Over 41,000 Hours of Jan 6 Video to Tucker Carlson

Their claim was a documentary type telling of what happened on January 6th.
Selected for editorial content......this is the fear from the left that their charade will be exposed through access to the same video footage the J6 committee 'used'.
The insurrectionists showed up the following day.
The night before would have been DC residents.
Even Ray Epps testimony revealed in a 94 page transcript showed he and friends and family were there before and on J6.
 
Maybe an attempt at inciting. Crowd smelled a rat, didn't they?

Incitement requires advocacy that is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action....else its protected by the 1st amendment and perfectly legal.

There's a rally, a couple of meals and a night's sleep between what Ray Epps said and the attack on the capitol. There's no 'imminent lawless action' in Ray Epps statement.
 
If you could see all the tapes, you could view how and where the secret service took Mike Pence.
Senator Dianne Feinstien's chauffeur for 20 years was a Chinese spy. Congressman Eric Swalwell's mistress was a spy for China. President Biden allowed a Chinese Spy balloon to drift and hover over our nuclear missile sites gathering communications and who knows wat else.

And your hair is on fire about what might be in 40,000 hours of security video? Give us all a break!

wTVQRG-Th.gif
 
And your hair is on fire about what might be in 40,000 hours of security video? Give us all a break!
As I said, they can't release footage that shows how and where the secret service took Mike Pence. Or the egress and safe rooms they evacuated the members of congress to.
 
Incitement requires advocacy that is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action....else its protected by the 1st amendment and perfectly legal.

There's a rally, a couple of meals and a night's sleep between what Ray Epps said and the attack on the capitol. There's no 'imminent lawless action' in Ray Epps statement.

Inciting would be determined at the prosecution level, no on an obscure internet forum.
I never said anything regarding Epps and imminet lawless action.
 
Inciting would be determined at the prosecution level, no on an obscure internet forum.
I never said anything regarding Epps and imminet lawless action.
You didn't say anything about 'imminent lawless action.'

But the Supreme Court did.
They've set the constitutional standard of protected speech as it relates to incitement in Hess V. Indiana.

Incitement isn't protected speech when it advocates imminent lawless action. If it doesn't, its protected.

There's nothing imminent about a statement made the day before.
 
He's the one making the claim like he has knowledge we don't.
Everyone was interviewed. The tecord includes all video. Use your brain, or do you want the MAGAs to know everything next time.*

* Protip if you get near the VP, they will stack your bodies like cordwood.
 
Everyone was interviewed. The tecord includes all video. Use your brain, or do you want the MAGAs to know everything next time.*

* Protip if you get near the VP, they will stack your bodies like cordwood.
What’s that got to do with winless knowing what is dangerous on the videos?
 
What’s that got to do with winless knowing what is dangerous on the videos?
You are indeed deeply stupid. You probably are watching Fox right now.

These are confidential security videos and now a huckster has them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top