Hunter Biden agrees to open testimony

Again, there is no reason to save any of those photos because they are so common.
Dang you are lucky.

You display them on other sites too or just this one?

Do you have the one where Giuliani was reaching into his pants for that lady he thought was 15?

What about of Santos crossdressing?

Or DeSantis grooming children?

Oldies but goodies. Good luck with your collections!
 
1701299408958.png
 
So they can smear his dad with lies.

Well, if it’s part of a potential impeachment, then that’s one thing, but just investigating hunter alone, that’s not Congress’ job, unless it’s for some kind of legislative reason.
 
:lol::lol:

Is she still alive? I haven't seen her around, even under aliases....

This thread topic was about trumps legal team asking for video, and the judge for now, turning them down.....

This defence team for his trial, through discovery, were given the transcripts on ALL of the 1/6 video interviews and witness interviews.

They have it ALL. His lawyers are dilly dallying and haven't even read the transcripts.
Probably because they need to have them read to them. tRump is scraping the bottom of the barrel for attorneys at this point!
 
Hunter thinks if the hearing is open the republicans will step in it and use the time to go after Joe which will make Hunter look sympathetic... it won't because no one likes a drug addict and a deadbeat dad.... especially one who illegally sells access to our federal government via his dad....
So why are teabaggers so afraid of proving that in open court?
 
Duplicate thread, oh, and, since when do the suspects subpoenaed to appear before congress get to determine the conditions of the hearing?

Since many people actually even in Congress have ignored congressional subpoenas in recent times.
 
Funny how the left did nothing but "closed door testimony" against Trump for J6. But when it's about Hunter Biden, they want everything out in the open.

Nah, no double standard here, folks.





Trump could have insisted on ope...en let the light shine on these proceedings."
 
With possibly more to come now that the southern district of New York maybe looking into him or the tRump organization!
For years Republicans without any evidence accused the Clinton's of using their foundation as a slush fund and way for foreign governments to give them money. No evidence.

But they don't mind that Trump's foundation was shut down because he was using it as a slush fund. And I'm sure if it wasn't shut down, you'd see a lot of foreign goverments donating to it. And that wouldn't bother them at all.

Every penny Joe Biden has ever made can be accounted for. Republicans found one time when a family member paid him back for a loan he gave them. I'm sure Trump never gave a family member a loan.
 
Why did the January 6th committee conduct 99% of their interviews behind closed doors?
They had hundreds of people they were interviewing and wanted each witness's testimony, not influenced by what other witnesses testified to.... By interviewing them separately, without each witness knowing what the other witnesses said, they felt they would better get to the truth.

In Hunter's case, there are not hundreds of other witnesses that he can be influenced by or that he can influence to coordinate stories.
 
They had hundreds of people they were interviewing and wanted each witness's testimony, not influenced by what other witnesses testified to.... By interviewing them separately, without each witness knowing what the other witnesses said, they felt they would better get to the truth.

In Hunter's case, there are not hundreds of other witnesses that he can be influenced by or that he can influence to coordinate stories.
Interview everyone else first, in private. Then interview Hunter publicly. We're not playing your games. You know we are right not to trust Republicans. This is clearly a witch hunt. So let's hold the hearings in Salem.
 

Forum List

Back
Top