Hunter Biden

so going after all of trumps people meant you had nothing on trump.
Except they’re going after Trump too, silly.

Or did you forget that he’s a target of a criminal investigation in New York.
trump is not the topic,,, please stop trolling and stick to the topic,,

wouldnt want to get your comments deleted would you???
Why are you complaining about my comment and not the person who brought Trump up in the first place?
because you have a long history of trolling threads and derailing them to make them about trump,,,
But he didn't here. So why are you complaining to him and not to the person (iceberg ) you say is trolling?
I didnt see his comment,,, but colfax has a long history of doing it,,,
Well that's not believable since iceberg's quote about Trump is plainly visible in colfax_m's post...

why???
Uh, because it's plainly visible.
what is???
iceberg's post.
whos that???
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, his name is in the post. It reads, "iceberg." And his quote about Trump is with it. How have you managed to not Darwin yourself so far being as retarded as you are?
how can you be sure???
Because I can read.
read what???
View attachment 401643
I'm not sure what youre trying to say,,,
Sadly, that's on you.
PH owns you waste of life. Your lack of deductive reasoning skills is apparent.
LOL

He owes you a dinner after that reach-around.
You’re gay? Biden campaign is not disputing the authenticity of the emails. LOL. More to come. You should purchase deductive reasoning skills for dummies. Poor waste of life. I made you look stupid again.
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
You disavow everything against your side and amplify everything about Trump.

Ergo, partisan troll.



Tim pool is liberal but not blind.
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
His campaign has stated the email is authentic. Trump said it was fake news and vehemently denied it in the open. Biden hid in the basement. Weak sauce.
 
so going after all of trumps people meant you had nothing on trump.
Except they’re going after Trump too, silly.

Or did you forget that he’s a target of a criminal investigation in New York.
trump is not the topic,,, please stop trolling and stick to the topic,,

wouldnt want to get your comments deleted would you???
Why are you complaining about my comment and not the person who brought Trump up in the first place?
because you have a long history of trolling threads and derailing them to make them about trump,,,
But he didn't here. So why are you complaining to him and not to the person (iceberg ) you say is trolling?
I didnt see his comment,,, but colfax has a long history of doing it,,,
Well that's not believable since iceberg's quote about Trump is plainly visible in colfax_m's post...

why???
Uh, because it's plainly visible.
what is???
iceberg's post.
whos that???
LOLOL

Dumbfuck, his name is in the post. It reads, "iceberg." And his quote about Trump is with it. How have you managed to not Darwin yourself so far being as retarded as you are?
how can you be sure???
Because I can read.
read what???
View attachment 401643
I'm not sure what youre trying to say,,,
Sadly, that's on you.
whats on me???

is it a spider??? I dont like spiders,,,
Not understanding my post.
you posted something???

I must have missed it,,,
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
You disavow everything against your side and amplify everything about Trump.

Ergo, partisan troll.



Tim pool is liberal but not blind.

Colfax is a hypocrite and a coward who put me on ignore. He won’t answer my questions.
 
like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.
What benefit have you provided to this topic?
What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?
Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.
I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
You disavow everything against your side and amplify everything about Trump.

Ergo, partisan troll.



Tim pool is liberal but not blind.


That’s not trolling, that’s having an opinion.

You don’t see this story as a little fishy?
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
You disavow everything against your side and amplify everything about Trump.

Ergo, partisan troll.



Tim pool is liberal but not blind.


That’s not trolling, that’s having an opinion.

You don’t see this story as a little fishy?

Duh. I said that the media in general cannot be trusted. Right or left leaning. But you are a hypocrite who believes leftist media only.
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
You disavow everything against your side and amplify everything about Trump.

Ergo, partisan troll.



Tim pool is liberal but not blind.


That’s not trolling, that’s having an opinion.

You don’t see this story as a little fishy?

You ate the Russia crap burger with a golden spork. You have no room to talk.
 
like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.
What benefit have you provided to this topic?
What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?
Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.
I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
You disavow everything against your side and amplify everything about Trump.

Ergo, partisan troll.



Tim pool is liberal but not blind.


That’s not trolling, that’s having an opinion.

You don’t see this story as a little fishy?

Duh. I said that the media in general cannot be trusted. Right or left leaning. But you are a hypocrite who believes leftist media only.

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.
 
like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.
What benefit have you provided to this topic?
What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?
Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.
I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.
A trolls someone who posts stupid shit they know is stupid to get a reaction and satisfy their sick jollies.
 
Critical thinking about this story leads to serious skepticism.



  1. The very idea that a laptop with a video of Hunter Biden smoking crack on it would be given to a random repair shop to recover is absurd. It is years since his drug use and Burisma dealings became a serious issue of international importance, and professionals would long since have taken custody of any relevant hardware or storage. It is beyond the worst operational security in the world to give an unencrypted device with confidential data on it to a third party. It is, however, very much a valid way for someone to make a device appear to be from a person or organization without providing any verification that it is so.
  2. The repair shop supposedly could not identify Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, as the customer. But the invoice (for $85 — remarkably cheap for diagnosis, recovery, and backup of three damaged Macs) has “Hunter Biden” written right on it, with a phone number and one of the email addresses he reportedly used. It seems unlikely that Hunter Biden’s personal laptop — again, loaded with personal and confidential information, and possibly communications with the VP — would be given to a small repair shop rather (than an Apple Store or vetted dealer) and that shop would be given his personal details for contact. Political operators with large supporting organizations simply don’t do that — though someone else could have.
  3. Even if they did, the idea that Biden or his assistant or whoever would not return to pick up the laptop or pay for the services is extremely suspicious. Again, these are supposedly the personal devices of someone who communicated regularly with the VP, and whose work had come under intense scrutiny long before they were dropped off. They would not be treated lightly or forgotten. On the other hand, someone who wanted this data to be inspected would do exactly this.
  4. That the laptops themselves were open and unencrypted is ridiculous. The serial number of the laptop suggests it was a 2017 MacBook Pro, probably running Mojave. Every Mac running Lion or later has easily enabled built-in encryption. It would be unusual for anyone to provide a laptop for repair that had no password or protection whatsoever on its files, let alone a person like Hunter Biden — again, years into efforts to uncover personal data relating to his work in Ukraine. An actor who wanted this data to be discovered and read would leave it unencrypted.
  5. That this information would be inspected by the repair shop at all is very suspect indeed. Recovery of an ostensibly damaged Mac would likely take the form of cloning the drive and checking its integrity against the original. There is no reason the files or apps themselves would need to be looked at in the course of the work in the first place. Some shops have software that checks file hashes, if they can see them, against a database of known child sex abuse material. And there have been notable breaches of trust where repair staff illicitly accessed the contents of a laptop to get personal data. But there’s really no legitimate reason for this business to inspect the contents of the devices they are working on, let alone share that information with anyone, let alone a partisan operative. The owner, and avid Trump supporter, gave an interview this morning giving inconsistent information on what had happened and suggested he investigated the laptops of his own volition and retained copies for personal protection.
  6. The data itself is not convincing. The Post has published screenshots of emails instead of the full text with metadata — something you would want to do if you wanted to show they were authentic. For stories with potential political implications, it’s wise to verify.
  7. Lastly, the fact that a copy was given to Giuliani and Bannon before being handed over to the FBI, and that it is all being published two weeks before the election, lends the whole thing a familiar stink — one you may remember from other pre-election shenanigans in 2016. The choice of the Post as the outlet for distribution is curious as well; one need only to accidentally step on one in the subway to understand why.
Laundry list of excuses. Why don’t you just admit that the media lies? Doesn’t fit your leftist narrative, eh Cowardly Colfax.
You have a childishly simplistic view of the world.
I disagree. I honestly believe you’re a very stupid person and are beneath me. Will you put me on ignore again like a coward?
he's a troll with a few optional features. but still a troll.
Trolls show up to threads with emotional outbursts that have nothing to do with the topic, which is what you’ve done.

I’ve provided, what 4 or 5 links to stories talking about the suspiciousness of this story. That’s not what a troll does.
You provided fake news to dispute fake news? Logic 101.
Well at least I’m actually discussing the topic instead of trolling.

Want to discuss the topic or do you have a different agenda?
I would but you would just cry and put me on ignore again. And I tried. I asked you why you believed the fake news about Trump but now don’t believe the supposed fake news about Biden? Trump also said “fake news” and was out front fighting it. Biden put a lid on his campaign and hid.

Deductive reasoning skills, which you lack, would make one at least a little suspicious and again you are a hypocrite.
The reasons to doubt this story are listed in my posts. You said they were “excuses” and didn’t try to address them.

So no, you didn’t try.
No. Biden put a lid on it. He is nervous. And sure it could be fake news. But you believed all about Trump. Makes you a hypocrite.
Why wouldn’t he be nervous? Fake news can be very powerful. Doesn’t matter if it’s fabricated. We already know Biden is a target of Russian disinformation. If his campaign isn’t worried about this ongoing threat, they’re not doing their job.

There’s legitimate reasons to have doubts about this story, none of which you’ve touched.
You disavow everything against your side and amplify everything about Trump.

Ergo, partisan troll.



Tim pool is liberal but not blind.


That’s not trolling, that’s having an opinion.

You don’t see this story as a little fishy?

Duh. I said that the media in general cannot be trusted. Right or left leaning. But you are a hypocrite who believes leftist media only.

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.

I broke another one. Why won’t you answer a simple question? Hmmm....lol
 
like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.
What benefit have you provided to this topic?
What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?
Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.
I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.
A trolls someone who posts stupid shit they know is stupid to get a reaction and satisfy their sick jollies.
He won’t answer why he believes questionable leftist media but not questionable rw media. Hmmmm....hypocrisy 101
 
You ate the Russia crap burger with a golden spork. You have no room to talk.
You mean because I believe Russia hacked the DNC to help Trump?

That’s been confirmed over and over again.
And yet we have Hillary email you say fake.

You never apply the same scrutiny for "your side" so you are a fucking partisan troll.

Good day.
 
like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.
What benefit have you provided to this topic?
What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?
Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.
I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.
A trolls someone who posts stupid shit they know is stupid to get a reaction and satisfy their sick jollies.
Mostly correct. It isn’t stupid to point out the odd characteristics of this story.
 
like i said - a troll with a few options added into the base model. but you still a troll.

have a day.
What benefit have you provided to this topic?
What benefit are you providing?

Really wanna play that game, troll boy?
Posting articles talking about reasons to be skeptical of this very fishy story.

It’s an attempt at a discussion.
I ask again, hypocrite, why did you believe the same questionable data on Trump?
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who starts flame wars or intentionally upsets people on the Internetby posting inflammatory and digressive,[1]extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses[2] and normalizing tangential discussion,[3] either for the troll's amusement or a specific gain.
A trolls someone who posts stupid shit they know is stupid to get a reaction and satisfy their sick jollies.
Mostly correct. It isn’t stupid to point out the odd characteristics of this story.
Biden put a lid on his campaign and they have admitted the emails are authentic. Everyone knows that Hunter got the gig because of his dad. I dont care. I do care that hypocrites vilify Trump and turn a blind eye to Biden. Weak sauce. Just admit you’re a hypocrite.
 

Forum List

Back
Top