Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #121
Then the produce doesn't get picked.The cost of paying locals a living wage is cheaper than the combination of slave-wages for Illegal Aliens + fallout from Illegal Aliens + locals starving.No, mark me down as one of those that believes if YOU want to pay more, feel free to do so.
If (a) the job needs to be done, (b) someone isn't willing to work for what the skills required to do the job are worth, then (c) find someone else willing to do it for that while not providing any social welfare to the one unwilling to work.
If the locals aren't willing to work a job where the pay is equal to the skills required to do it, let them starve.
Next slide, please.
I have an easy solution. Get rid of the illegals and let the locals unwilling to work for a wage equal to their skills starve. Solves any problems including fallout.
Unacceptable.
In order to ensure that it is picked, while keeping Illegal Aliens out of the mix...
The only real-world practical answer is to pay the locals more...
Allowing the free and open labor marketplace to determine the level of wages...
If you've got a better solution that still gets the produce picked without using Illegal Aliens, by all means, lay it out in front of the audience.
Otherwise, sans Illegals, you'll pay more for your produce, whether you like it or not...
Courtesy of the free and open marketplace of labor, driving the narrative...
If they paid $22.00 an hour plus good benefits, they would get plenty of Americans to do the job. I don't mind paying more for produce if I know it's supporting American workers while at the same time, knowing I'm supporting the end of foreign labor dependency.
When discussing minimum wage, the libs have told me it won't raise the price of our hamburgers all that much. But God forbid we get rid of foreign labor causing a wage increase to get our grapes picked. Grapes would be unaffordable according to our liberal friends.
We have or rather had a traditional servant class that worked for low wages and we did quite well....but along comes LBJ and the usual suspects and began to pay the servants to stay home, to have babies and believe they were beautiful and entitled to be supported by the white working class and viola....we no longer have enough folks willing to work the low paying jobs...what sane person wants a hard job that does not pay well when they can stay home and be supported by the gubmint using the tax monies of the white working class to do so?
So the solution is simple....if you do not work you do not eat...that policy has a history....as when the first colonists arrived here...some thought they were too good to work...thus that rule was instituted...if you do not work...you do not eat..it worked back then and it would work now.
For any society to work there must be a distribution of labor...meaning..not everyone can have a high paying job, not everyone can be a nuclear physicist....thus communism always failed because they tried to make everyone equal....as is our policy now...like we do not know that communism aka marxism, aka socialism has never worked and never will work...witness Venezueala....so the solution is to get folks off the dole and when they are presented the choice of working or starving...guess what they will choose. It is not a fair world folks....there is no nirvana on this earth.
Only the idiots on the left would think handing someone more for doing nothing than they could earn with the skills they offer is an incentive for them to get a job.
I have no problem watching people unwilling to for themselves what they should be doing for themselves go without anything including the necessities.