I am DISGUSTED.

[irosie91]

No. No torture. For any reason.

what are you calling "torture"? Have you ever interviewed an incarcerated or "person in custody" who claimed he/she was
"tortured" or subjected to "inhuman conditions"?

 

[Billo_Really]

Then all leftist need to shut up. Its torture

Good comeback! Bravo!

 

[Billo_Really]

what are you calling "torture"? Have you ever interviewed an incarcerated or "person in custody" who claimed he/she was
"tortured" or subjected to "inhuman conditions"?

No.

 

[flacaltenn]

Rights are to be taken away by the proper process of law. By force, no.

No govt can enumerate all my rights. Not even all of your rights. We maintain those BECAUSE our govt assumes those are there and LIMITS ITSELF in what they can "take away".

No wonder you hate this country. You have no clue how it works.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No govt can enumerate all my rights. Not even all of your rights. We maintain those BECAUSE our govt assumes those are there and LIMITS ITSELF in what they can "take away".

No wonder you hate this country. You have no clue how it works.

but the chick wanting to torture people is just fine and cool in your book.

Seems that last line in your post applies to you as well

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I notice that the libs care more about torturing a lowlife scumbag than the torture and KILLING of an unborn, innocent child.

Leftists always defend the wrong people.

Most of the people disagreeing with you are diehard MAGA right-wingers.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I notice that the libs care more about torturing a lowlife scumbag than the torture and KILLING of an unborn, innocent child.

Leftists always defend the wrong people.

you are wrong there are conservatives telling you, you are wrong. And just to remind you if they had tortured him to find her dead body he would walk on the murder charges.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If it’s torture for punishment, no. If it’s torture to get information from the lowlife that COULD save the life of his innocent victim, yes.

Case in point was the ex-felon scumbag who kidnapped, raped, tortured, and then murdered an innocent woman. He refused to give her whereabouts. It was POSSIBLE, though doubtful, that she was still alive, and a few minutes of waterboarding could have given her the 50 years the monster stole from her.

She was already dead, dumbass!

 

[Billo_Really]

No govt can enumerate all my rights. Not even all of your rights. We maintain those BECAUSE our govt assumes those are there and LIMITS ITSELF in what they can "take away".

No wonder you hate this country. You have no clue how it works.

How off topic can you possibly get? The Queen is not even in the ground and my banner is not as shiny as others are!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

But how do you know which thug the torture would not work on? if there’s a chance to save the life of the criminal’s innocent victim, it’s worth a try. The worst that happens is that the ex-felon lowlife suffers a few minutes of misery. The best that happens is that a life was saved,

To do so is unconstitutional. Perhaps you should read it sometime!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

But they didn’t know she was dead at the time.

Where do you think she was, chained to an old Buick's bumper?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Most of the people disagreeing with you are diehard MAGA right-wingers.

Who agreed with that low-life?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Who agreed with that low-life?

a lot thus this thread in the other thread about 15 people liked or commented in support of protectionists demands the cops should have tortured him.

 

[miketx]

And if he was innocent?

Torture him more, for making them get the wrong guy.

 

[flacaltenn]

How off topic can you possibly get? The Queen is not even in the ground and my banner is not as shiny as others are!

Topic is torture. You have a right NOT to be tortured unless a catastrophic nuclear, bio, chemical attack is imminent and you are involved in it. Explaining that WE GIVE govt their rights -- Govt doesn't give us rights is KINDA fundamental to the topic.

 

[Billo_Really]

Topic is torture. You have a right NOT to be tortured unless a catastrophic nuclear, bio, chemical attack is imminent and you are involved in it. Explaining that WE GIVE govt their rights -- Govt doesn't give us rights is KINDA fundamental to the topic.

It is not okay torture anyone, for any reason, at any time.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

And you are rude and insulting simply because I value the life of an innocent woman over some temporary discomfort by her attacker in order to try and save her life.

You advocate torture. That is morally wrong for US citizens and is unconstitutional. How can you resolve that dilemma?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You advocate torture. That is morally wrong for US citizens and is unconstitutional. How can you resolve that dilemma?

its worse she is jewish and had family killed by Germany yet supports those tactics when they make her feel good,

 

[bodecea]

And you are rude and insulting simply because I value the life of an innocent woman over some temporary discomfort by her attacker in order to try and save her life.

You are FOR torture. Nothing more needs to be said.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You already said that. He was more than a suspect. He was a lifelong criminal with hard evidence against him. The woman’s life was worth more than a few minutes of the lowlife’s discomfort.

What part of "unconstitutional" do you not get? Are you stupid or insane?