Mr. Jones
Senior Member
- Jan 21, 2009
- 2,501
- 163
Asymmetrical structural damage that produced symmetrical collapses, that should have instead leaned, toppled over and taken a longer time to fall are all things that are not explained by NIST. There are no miracles in science, but NIST found it had to resort to a first time miracle to weasel out of explaining WTC 7.Structural damage
To believe NIST is to be ignorant to these things, or worse.
Of course the easiest explanation is that the massive buildings were assisted in their collapses by some other means, like Silverstein was alleged
to have mentioned to his insurance company in a phone call, and noted by a reporter. Perhaps that is why the BBC and other networks knew it would be coming down
just not at the time it was reported on and aired. The problem with this is that a 47 story fortified skyscraper can not be rigged in such a short time, so that leaves pre facilitating the building in the months prior to 9-11 as the only logical explanation.
Last edited: