Aba Incieni
Gold Member
- Dec 13, 2017
- 8,910
- 1,282
- 290
Explain to the class which part of the definition is faulty. The human or the being part.Your "logic" only works IF you are a member of a brand of religion that holds this view. Moreover, nature aborts pregnancies, as well.It is a being, because it is alive. It is human because a woman cannot conceive anything else. Therefore, it is a human being.It is a potential human being, not an actual one. In any event, I think that a woman who shares your beliefs will not have an abortion. People holding other religious beliefs might. That is their choice.If it will live and become a viable human being, it is murder.Not bringing a zygote/fetus to term is not killing, though.Abortion buries them in body count.
Mind your own business and other people will mind their's.
The birthrate is doing just fine. As a matter of fact, the world is over-populated. Or is your comment a racial thing?Well, they are wrong on both counts.Look at what they actually say. Look how they crow white Christians are dying off. They figure that, at some point, your group will be small and impotent enough that they'll never have to be decent to you. And they may be right.
.
White Christians will be back on the rebound once the economy is impacted by robotics. Then hand made items for barter will return to prominence and the inherent advantage of having kids in terms of economics for the family unit will spur more white babies.
unfortunately, most white people would rather have a second car than a second child and this is pathetic. In earlier times where kids could work the farm this was an advantage in having more healthy educated kids.
When this returns so will the birth rate.
Besides all that, Hispanics are white too, lol.