Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It DOESN'T MATTER which "version" is correct. The video is all that is necessary.The only source giving your version is the police union. Official investigators disagree.
Lol I love how you’re retarded enough to believe all of this justified him getting shot. It’s not like the argument has anything to do with whether or not he’s a good person.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
You're an idiot.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
What weapon?Lol I love how you’re retarded enough to believe all of this justified him getting shot. It’s not like the argument has anything to do with whether or not he’s a good person.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
How would you have stopped him, he was going for a weapon and tasers didn't work.
.
Then YOU'RE DEAD. It takes him 1/2 second to suddenly point a gun at you and shoot one shot to your heart, at close range. He can't miss. You don't get it.Uh no. I would not shoot him. If there was information that indicated he had a gun, then yes. This is all basic common sense.
Well not sure why I have to remind you but this guy didn’t have a gun lolThen YOU'RE DEAD. It takes him 1/2 second to suddenly point a gun at you and shoot one shot to your heart, at close range. He can't miss. You don't get it.Uh no. I would not shoot him. If there was information that indicated he had a gun, then yes. This is all basic common sense.
You wold also be in violation of police protocol. Cops are requiring to shoot the instant that the suspects hands disappear from his/her view, Taught in every police academy in america. Same with National Guard (of which I used to be one).
None of your deflections matter. Your weakest deflection is the claim he had a knife as if he was holding a knife. A knife was found in his car. However, your case falls apart because you can't deflect from or defend the major point. The cop shot him seven times at point blank range in the back while holding him from the back of his shirt.The only source giving your version is the police union. Official investigators disagree.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
Right, that's why you provided evidence to support you opinion. NOT! BTW I haven't heard any statement from the police union, you got a link for that? Oh I forgot on other fact, he took the woman's car as well, he was confronted by the police when he returned. So you can add grand theft to the lengthy list of charges.
.
What weapon?Lol I love how you’re retarded enough to believe all of this justified him getting shot. It’s not like the argument has anything to do with whether or not he’s a good person.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
How would you have stopped him, he was going for a weapon and tasers didn't work.
.
You sure you didn’t just make that shit up?What weapon?Lol I love how you’re retarded enough to believe all of this justified him getting shot. It’s not like the argument has anything to do with whether or not he’s a good person.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
How would you have stopped him, he was going for a weapon and tasers didn't work.
.
A knife.
.
None of your deflections matter. Your weakest deflection is the claim he had a knife as if he was holding a knife. A knife was found in his car. However, your case falls apart because you can't deflect from or defend the major point. The cop shot him seven times at point blank range in the back while holding him from the back of his shirt.The only source giving your version is the police union. Official investigators disagree.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
Right, that's why you provided evidence to support you opinion. NOT! BTW I haven't heard any statement from the police union, you got a link for that? Oh I forgot on other fact, he took the woman's car as well, he was confronted by the police when he returned. So you can add grand theft to the lengthy list of charges.
.
You sure you didn’t just make that shit up?What weapon?Lol I love how you’re retarded enough to believe all of this justified him getting shot. It’s not like the argument has anything to do with whether or not he’s a good person.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
How would you have stopped him, he was going for a weapon and tasers didn't work.
.
A knife.
.
You sure you didn’t just make that shit up?What weapon?Lol I love how you’re retarded enough to believe all of this justified him getting shot. It’s not like the argument has anything to do with whether or not he’s a good person.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
He should never have gotten to his car door. Simple as that. They already had weapons trained on him and they should have done a takedown before it went as far as it did. They had the numbers. And not seeing his hands isn't justification to pump 7 rounds point plank into his back. That had to be the most dangerous and sloppy police procedure (If you can call it that) I have ever seen. It endangered not only the perp but the cops themselves.
It's not a liberal or conservative or even a Party of the Rump, it's a Police Procedure and Safety thing and a cop who just wanted to kill someone in the heat of the moment.
The OP left out a few facts, the dude was there violating a restraining order held by a woman he had sexually assaulted. He had a warrant for his arrest. He had already fought with police getting one in a head lock. He had been tasered twice with no effect, that would indicate he was most likely on drugs. You're right it should have never gotten that far, they should have shot him before he reached the car, non-deadly force had proven ineffective.
.
How would you have stopped him, he was going for a weapon and tasers didn't work.
.
A knife.
.
Doesn't matter if suspect has a weapon or not. Just the fact that the cop becomes unable to defend himself (when the suspect's hands disappear), requires him to shoot the suspect. That's the SOP, and it's correct. Otherwise you're having the cop gamble, with his life as the stakes, Not the way we do things in America.What weapon?
You're not a very good student.Man, oh Man, the Party of the Rumpsters sure are active tonight. The Bloodlust is just flowing from them. From pumping in 7 shots, inventing a knife to protecting a killer teen to trying to incite a civil war, it sure is busy tonight. And it isn't even a full moon.
It has absolutely nothing to do with the suspect being a good or bad person. It has only to do with 2 things. The suspect hands being VISIBLE & EMPTY.Lol I love how you’re retarded enough to believe all of this justified him getting shot. It’s not like the argument has anything to do with whether or not he’s a good person.
Doesn't matter if suspect has a weapon or not. Just the fact that the cop becomes unable to defend himself (when the suspect's hands disappear), requires him to shoot the suspect. That's the SOP, and it's correct. Otherwise you're having the cop gamble, with his life as the stakes, Not the way we do things in America.What weapon?
I refuse to play your silly game of fantasy. Being a cop is like being in combat and folks speculating on how they would react in combat is fraudulent, fruitless, and insulting.It DOESN'T MATTER which "version" is correct. The video is all that is necessary.The only source giving your version is the police union. Official investigators disagree.
How about if you answer the question of the OP ? Let's say YOU'RE wearing that blue uniform and a badge. What would YOU do ?
See Post # 26. Maybe read it a little slower this time. Better get it right. It will be you life on the line if you don't.Well not sure why I have to remind you but this guy didn’t have a gun lol
I refuse to play your silly game of fantasy. Being a cop is like being in combat and folks speculating on how they would react in combat is fraudulent, fruitless, and insulting.It DOESN'T MATTER which "version" is correct. The video is all that is necessary.The only source giving your version is the police union. Official investigators disagree.
How about if you answer the question of the OP ? Let's say YOU'RE wearing that blue uniform and a badge. What would YOU do ?
Only shoot if I see a weapon.Liberals who claim that Jason Blake was shot unjustly (which probably is all liberals in this forum), please answer this >.
If YOU were a police officer, and you were questioning somebody about a serious crime, and he suddenly bolts away from you, and then reaches into a car, with his hands now not visible to you, what do you do ?
