I Could Be Wrong….

[PoliticalChic]

Are you rightwinger.......these one liners are starting to look like his one liner troll posts.....LOL

Be fair.....this one only lies a tenth the number of that other dunce.

 

[MeBelle]

I figured it worked for you, so...

Why can't you stay on topic?

Voice your opinion without insulting other members

wth is your problem?

 

[eagle1462010]

Be fair.....this one only lies a tenth the number of that other dunce.

It's his alter ego.........trying to spin a one line in the opposite direction.

 

[MeBelle]

I lived in Bed Sty for my 1st 20 years Walked 15 blocks to Boys High every day for 4 years NEVER a problem

And how would that work for you in 'today's' world?

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Constitutional expert, Randy Barnett, put it this way:

“The Constitution of the United States begins with the words: “We the People.” But from the earliest days of the American republic, there have been two competing notions of “the People,” which lead to two very different visions of the Constitution.

Those who view “We the People” collectively think popular sovereignty resides in the people as a group, which leads them to favor a “democratic” constitution that allows the “will of the people” to be expressed by majority rule. In contrast, those who think popular sovereignty resides in the people as individuals contend that a “republican” constitution is needed to secure the pre-existing inalienable rights of “We the People,” each and every one, against abuses by the majority.” “Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People” ++++By Randy E. Barnett




7. As you can see, having a personality disorder as Liberals do, that is, having to look to their associates to see if they can have a particular idea, or opinion, makes for a particular outlook in the way the nation is governed.

When Democrats/Liberals/Progressives are in charge, everyone must agree with the orthodoxy of the moment, bake a cake as dictated by the government, break any religious convictions that run counter to that of the authorities.

That is the view of communism, socialism, Progessivism, Liberalism, Fascism and Nazism.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Is that rule in the GOP handbook?

No. That's Godwin's Law.

 

[eddiew]

And how would that work for you in 'today's' world?

Don't believe I'd have a problem Bed Sty moved up from a slummy area to one of the most desired in Bkly'n

 

[eddiew]

Biden will abolish the suburbs ?? Trump is off his rocker ,,but we already knew that

 

[Taz]

Why can't you stay on topic?

Voice your opinion without insulting other members

wth is your problem?

Did you not notice where she tried to insult me first?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Don't believe I'd have a problem Bed Sty moved up from a slummy area to one of the most desired in Bkly'n

I see you don't want to admit your story took place decades ago.


Violent crime rate is 140% of the national average

Bedford-Stuyvesant, NY Crime Rates: Stats & Map

View detailed crime rates in Bedford-Stuyvesant, New York, NY as well as a Bedford-Stuyvesant crime density heat map.

www.areavibes.com

" the neighborhood placed near the bottom of the DNAinfo.com list of safest neighborhoods, "
Bedford-Stuyvesant - DNAinfo.com Crime and Safety Report


Which party is responsible for this?

 

[Taz]

6. Constitutional expert, Randy Barnett, put it this way:

“The Constitution of the United States begins with the words: “We the People.” But from the earliest days of the American republic, there have been two competing notions of “the People,” which lead to two very different visions of the Constitution.

Those who view “We the People” collectively think popular sovereignty resides in the people as a group, which leads them to favor a “democratic” constitution that allows the “will of the people” to be expressed by majority rule. In contrast, those who think popular sovereignty resides in the people as individuals contend that a “republican” constitution is needed to secure the pre-existing inalienable rights of “We the People,” each and every one, against abuses by the majority.” “Our Republican Constitution: Securing the Liberty and Sovereignty of We the People” ++++By Randy E. Barnett




7. As you can see, having a personality disorder as Liberals do, that is, having to look to their associates to see if they can have a particular idea, or opinion, makes for a particular outlook in the way the nation is governed.

When Democrats/Liberals/Progressives are in charge, everyone must agree with the orthodoxy of the moment, bake a cake as dictated by the government, break any religious convictions that run counter to that of the authorities.

That is the view of communism, socialism, Progessivism, Liberalism, Fascism and Nazism.

NEWS FLASH: You're not the "we" in "we the people".

 

[PoliticalChic]

Did you not notice where she tried to insult me first?

Wadda ya' mean, "tried"?????

 

[kaz]

Your title got cut off.

"I Could Be Wrong…. AGAIN."

You don't know that leftists are collectivists? Seriously? Eyes wide shut?

 

[Taz]

Wadda ya' mean, "tried"?????

It was an epic fail, you're not very good at it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

NEWS FLASH: You're not the "we" in "we the people".

This is what brought you slithering in......how about trying to address it?


1.This is what I had in mind: Liberals are fearful folks, and need the reassurance of being part of a mob, a crowd, a group. There is a well-known phrase that memorializes the idea: Lock-Step Liberal. And Lock-stepping has an uncanny similarity to ‘Goose-stepping,’ and we all know what that refers to, the National Socialist Workers Party….er, I mean the Democrat Party.

2. Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.



3. Coulter put it this way: “The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.”

4. People desperate for a badge of identity are highly susceptible to groupthink, in fierce need of a ‘guide,’ and, so, the “foolish, ignorant, and envious persons are freed from the sense of their insignificance and powerlessness.”
Le Bon, “The Crowd: A Study of The Popular Mind,” p.22.




5. They abhor standing up by themselves and elucidating their beliefs, and their most common statement about beliefs is something like, “yeah….me too!!”

Two things one never comes across is a. a Liberal who can defend and explain the doctrines put forth by their party, and b. one ready to offer several books that have formed his geopolitical outlook.

But they love, love, love being able to point to the throng to which they belong, and claim…”all of us, that’s what we all believe!” Cogs in the big wheel of Liberalism.
The aggregation is their authentication, consensus validates their existence, belonging is what their lives are about….and they know what will happen to them if they digress.



Now, here’s why the above is pertinent. While conservatives are 180° opposite the above characteristics, the result is that we on the Right champion individualism, and those described above, the Left, favor collectivism, group-think, following orders.
And it boils down to this: If Liberals are in power, we become a collectivist, socialist nation.
If conservatives are in power.....freedom and liberty.

 

[Dragonlady]

I post threads for the specific purpose of debating points.

Where are the points.....all linked, sourced, documents, as always, .....that you can dispute????

If you can't......you've validated the OP.

And you’re lying. You post threads so you can heap abuse on the FB liberals who discredit and debunk your bullshit.

You can’t even defend the crap you post, nor do you have any debating skills. Reposting your OP endlessly when challenged on its content isn’t “debating”.

Insulting people who debunk your alt-right lies isn’t debating either.

 

[Taz]

You don't know that leftists are collectivists? Seriously? Eyes wide shut?

That was her headline, not mine. I would have gone for delusional.

 

[Taz]

This is what brought you slithering in......how about trying to address it?


1.This is what I had in mind: Liberals are fearful folks, and need the reassurance of being part of a mob, a crowd, a group. There is a well-known phrase that memorializes the idea: Lock-Step Liberal. And Lock-stepping has an uncanny similarity to ‘Goose-stepping,’ and we all know what that refers to, the National Socialist Workers Party….er, I mean the Democrat Party.

2. Liberals, in my experience, are fearful folks who need the bodyguard of big government because they are vulnerable, battered emotional hypochondriacs....they need to insure themselves against every societal misadventure that could occur. They call that 'empathy,' but it's actually neurosis. They have some sort of metaphorical bullet lodged near their heart, just waiting for a slight move which will end it all! Thus, the overwhelming feeling of incipient failure, and apprehension. And, recognizing their own weakness, they lash out at those willing to depend on themselves.



3. Coulter put it this way: “The mob mentality is irresistible to people with a desperate need to be popular, and are perennially afraid of getting a bloody nose on the playground of life. A tell-tale sign is the use of terms like “us” and “we” when they write, or speak…as these pronouns speak of popularity, of membership in the larger group…i.e. the mob.”

4. People desperate for a badge of identity are highly susceptible to groupthink, in fierce need of a ‘guide,’ and, so, the “foolish, ignorant, and envious persons are freed from the sense of their insignificance and powerlessness.”
Le Bon, “The Crowd: A Study of The Popular Mind,” p.22.




5. They abhor standing up by themselves and elucidating their beliefs, and their most common statement about beliefs is something like, “yeah….me too!!”

Two things one never comes across is a. a Liberal who can defend and explain the doctrines put forth by their party, and b. one ready to offer several books that have formed his geopolitical outlook.

But they love, love, love being able to point to the throng to which they belong, and claim…”all of us, that’s what we all believe!” Cogs in the big wheel of Liberalism.
The aggregation is their authentication, consensus validates their existence, belonging is what their lives are about….and they know what will happen to them if they digress.



Now, here’s why the above is pertinent. While conservatives are 180° opposite the above characteristics, the result is that we on the Right champion individualism, and those described above, the Left, favor collectivism, group-think, following orders.
And it boils down to this: If Liberals are in power, we become a collectivist, socialist nation.
If conservatives are in power.....freedom and liberty.

Copy&paste... AGAIN! Shows that you can't think for yourself.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

How do you explain lock step Trumpers? Do they just want to belong to something, because they've been left out for years, and Trump made them feel wanted?

Who are "Trumpers"?
I can tell you - they are a made up group.
Basically, anyone who doesn't rabidly spew hatred towards him is a "Trumper".
Gets back to the OP's point - creating this group in your minds is also a sign of desperation. To be a member of the "better people" - not those "other" people.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Biden will abolish the suburbs ?? Trump is off his rocker ,,but we already knew that

I hate to have to eviscerate you again.....


"Biden and Dems Are Set to Abolish the Suburbs"

Biden and Dems Are Set to Abolish the Suburbs | National Review

If suburban voters knew what the Democrats had in store for them, they’d run screaming in the other direction.

www.nationalreview.com