True and agreed. But COMPLETELY irrelevant here.
No one has ever suggested otherwise. You keep bringing it in here with a "look what I found" as if it has some kind of significance or relevance. It doesn't.
NO IT DOES NOT. It means if you're going slower than somebody else (comparative adjective -- vehicle A slower compared to vehicle B) then you need to be to the right. How fast either one of you are going does not even enter into it.
Except that ridiculous assertion just above.
IRRELEVANT. This is not a speed law; the speed law is separate. The simple laws of physics and prescribed traffic patterns demand a protocol. The protocol is that passing is done to the left. What anyone's speed is as an absolute number at the time is irrelevant. All that matters is the relative speed between the two.
If the world actually worked in this bizarre way -- and I still wanna know why you aren't sharing whatever gave you this cockamamie idea -- the sign would say "Under 65 keep right".
And if in this Bizarro World that sign meant that, then as long as there was a vehicle traveling at the max speed limit in the right lane, no one could ever pass it. So if you had an eight lane highway seven of those lanes would be empty and unusable.
Your logic.
