Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good point on the blm protest, we had many officials giving police stand down orders and saying let them riot. There was no concern for the safety of the families living in apartments above the business that were being stormed and torched.In other words "You didnt cause this riot, but since you didnt tell them to stop, the riot is now YOUR fault, Trump". Ok, so how was Trump supposed to tell rioters to stop rioting? People who are busy chucking rocks at the police arent checking their twitter feed, so how the fuck was he supposed to tell them anything?
Also, which democrat is at fault for the BLM riots because they didnt tell BLM to stop rioting, or does your standard only apply to the right??
In other words "You didnt cause this riot, but since you didnt tell them to stop, the riot is now YOUR fault, Trump". Ok, so how was Trump supposed to tell rioters to stop rioting? People who are busy chucking rocks at the police arent checking their twitter feed, so how the fuck was he supposed to tell them anything?
Also, which democrat is at fault for the BLM riots because they didnt tell BLM to stop rioting, or does your standard only apply to the right??
Trump was no more in charge of protesters who support him than democrats were in charge of summer long protesters who support democrats.I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.
At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.
Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.
From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:
FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.
Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.
The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)
Not only did the democrats not tell them to stop....they encouraged them, paid for them, bailed them out of jail, took a knee in support of them....the democrats used their brown shirts, blm and antifa, to attack Trump before the election....7 months of democrat party violence to hurt Trump....
Yea that makes sense put Republicans on the committee that are part of the investigation and die hard Trump Humpers.Why did Pelosi remove republicans that were questioning her lack of proper securities posture? OH, Thats RIght .. they didn't fit her agenda... GET TRUMP. GO F/O
Hillary has never conceded... She still thinks it was stolen to this very day, just ask her...
www.npr.org
I take it the "hearings" were another dudIf you fill a mob with lies to enrage them
Tell them they need to do something about the election
Send them to the Capitol
That is incitement
I take it the "hearings" were another dud
He told them all to go home and before that he said "peacefully and patrioticly" make their voices heard. What crime is that?I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.
At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.
Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.
From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:
FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.
Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.
The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)
He told them all to go home and before that he said "peacefully and patrioticly" make their voices heard. What crime is that?
This is just another dog and pony show for TDS suffering DC elitist. A show trial to hide their own failures and corruption
If Trump did anything that resembles a crime then Pelosi and the dems that called for cities to burn for BLM and attacks on the Supreme Court justices should be worse right?2 hours after it started and he was informed it was going down. Rump is a criminal who is finally starting to pay the price.
When you only hear the prosecution‘s version of a case it is easy to believe the defendant is guilty.I really hate to say this, and I fully acknowledge that Schumer and Pelosi committed their share of wrongdoing in the matter, but the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the January 6 riot to continue by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
This is a two-edged sword that cuts at both sides. Chuck Schumer sat on vital intel about plans to storm the Capitol, and Nancy Pelosi twice turned down requests to use National Guard troops to guard the Capitol on January 6, even though Trump had approved their use. However, the January 6 committee has found clear evidence that Trump purposely allowed the riot to continue, that he purposely delayed telling his supporters to stand down after the riot began.
Trump clearly acted as an accessory to the riot after it began. He never called for violence before it occurred; in fact, he urged his supporters to protest peacefully, and he authorized 20,000 NG troops to guard the Capitol. But once the riot began, he acted as an accessory to a felony by refusing to immediately call on his supporters to cease and desist. This was a serious criminal action, and the GOP should repudiate Trump and expel him from the party over it.
At the other end, Schumer's failure to act on the FBI intel, or even to ensure that the capitol police received the intel, is inexcusable and suggests that he wanted the riot to occur so he could use it for propaganda purposes against the Republicans. The Democrats should force Schumer to resign over his failure to act on the FBI intel.
Similarly, Nancy Pelosi's inexplicable failure to allow NG troops to help guard the Capitol on January 6 suggests that she, too, wanted the riot to occur so it could be used for propaganda purposes. The claim that she refused to use the troops because this would have been "bad optics" is lame, given that she had no problem forcing the troops to guard the Capitol for five months after the riot, long after there was any credible need for them to be there. Pelosi should be forced to resign because of her refusal to allow NG troops to guard the Capitol on January 6.
From John Solomon's second blockbuster article based on newly obtained documents:
FBI intelligence warning that Jan. 6 protesters might violently storm the Capitol, target lawmakers and blockade Democrats in tunnels was never sent to frontline police commanders and officers, but was quietly emailed the night before to a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to documents that raise new concern that politics trumped security preparedness in the fateful hours before the riot.
Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed top Schumer aide Kelly Fado, now the Senate's deputy sergeant of arms, at about 9:40 p.m. on Jan. 5, 2021 saying he wanted to "provide you visibility" to new intelligence that an FBI threat analysis center had received from a website owner, according to documents obtained by Just the News.
The information explicitly warned that demonstrators had detailed maps of the tunnel systems around the Capitol frequented by lawmakers and their staffs and they were plotting to create a "perimeter" for potential violence and to find "Democratic members early to block them from entering the Capitol." One point of entry the rioters were targeting was the Library of Congress, he warned.(Jan. 6 Bombshell: Schumer team received FBI intel about possible violence, frontline cops didn't)
When you only hear the prosecution‘s version of a case it is easy to believe the defendant is guilty.
so nothing to speak of then.If you mean that the dud Orange MAGA Domestic Terrorist and Traitor will face criminal charges in at least 2 states and the DOJ, you would be right.
Yes, it was only a hearing and a kangaroo hearing at best.Well, if an indictment lands on the desk.
And.....if a trial ensues....you may get your defendant's version.
No?
BTW....who is your defendant? Remember, this is only...merely...a 'hearing'. You may be fretting over a fantasy. IMHO
Give us some examples where they called for cities to burn.If Trump did anything that resembles a crime then Pelosi and the dems that called for cities to burn for BLM and attacks on the Supreme Court justices should be worse right?
No? Then STFU
I take it the "hearings" were another dud
Yes, it was only a hearing and a kangaroo hearing at best.
may be true, but...Especially with if you are a MAGA Conservative
...that pretty much symbolizes the nation
No, that symbolizes Trump Humpersmay be true, but...
...that pretty much symbolizes the nation
