I just got my Biden gas pump stickers

[Sunni Man]

You mean to tell us that you defaced someone else's property to push your own political ideals? That's terrorism.

Yea, no doubt I'm on some terrorist list for subversive stickers. ...

 

[petro]

Yea, no doubt I'm on some terrorist list for subversive stickers. ...

Some Karen tried ripping them off some local pumps.
Probably went home and kicked their dog after.

 

[flacaltenn]

You mean to tell us that you defaced someone else's property to push your own political ideals? That's terrorism.

That would bother me if the left DIDN'T USE PAINT instead of stickers to express their opinions.

 

[The Original Tree]

If gas prices go down are you going to go peel them off?

No we will just replace them with other disasters Biden is responsible for like Ukraine-Russia, Iran getting Nukes, Afghanistan, Supply Chain bullshit.

 

[flacaltenn]

Yea, no doubt I'm on some terrorist list for subversive stickers. ...

For the next 2.5 years -- you COULD be. If parents at a school board deserve to have the Patriotic act applied to them (or the Jan 19 protesters for that matter) -- we gotta expect the worse.

 

[The Original Tree]

That would bother me if the left DIDN'T USE PAINT instead of stickers to express their opinions.

What building is that, which BLM defaced with graffiti?

 

[rightnow909]

I ordered a pack of these "I did that" Biden stickers off Ebay, and they arrived in the mail today.
Went to the place I usually get gas, and while filling up my car put a sticker on the pump. On the other side of my gas pump there was a couple of guys filling up their work truck. So I put a Biden sticker on the gas pump they were using. Both of them started laughing and gave me a big thumbs up. ....

View attachment 619673

I saw one sticker that had a kind of evil-looking dude in a hood saying something

like

I hope you care about us Mr President

(why is a thief called that anyway?)

 

[rightnow909]

Nonsense....

View attachment 619702

where can I get a sticker

like this?

=

 

[petro]

What building is that, which BLM defaced with graffiti?

In Mpls, a few months ago major work to I-35 was just completed. The new overpasses already are tagged with BLM graffiti.

 

[rightnow909]

We had peak oil production to 17 million barrels a day in 2019. WE down to about 12 million now.

The policies of Trump could get permits in DAYS........under Biden a half a year or none at all. Want permission SUE ME............ yes Brandon is responsible.

byedim had the nerve to say, when T was pres... RE the violence of Antifa and blm

"it happened under Trump's watch"

that is coming back to bite him

some would say it's all political

but how in God's name was Trump, Mr. Law and Order, responsible for Antifa and blm VIOLENCE

byedim is not too bright...

and by the way, some of that violence ended in MURDER

24 dead last time I looked



+

 

[flacaltenn]

What building is that, which BLM defaced with graffiti?

It was statue -- maybe in Richmond or Charlotesville. I'll go look. Yeah Richmond.

Of course the paint cans came out in D.C. as well.

SHOULD HAVE USED STICKERS !!!! Naughty protesters..

 

[imawhosure]

LOLOLOLOL, the Left knows they're screwed, and all the deflection in the world isn't going to save them. Fuel, empty shelves, inflation out the wazzoo, the border, Afghanistan, Ukraine, China, North Korea, and the list is much longer than that.

You might be able to deflect 1, maybe even 2, but all of them, lololololol. You Leftists are Post Toasties come November. The question isn't if you are, it is by how many, lolololol!

 

[Stormy Daniels]

That would bother me if the left DIDN'T USE PAINT instead of stickers to express their opinions.

Ah, but see, the BLM protests were labeled as terrorism by some.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Yea, no doubt I'm on some terrorist list for subversive stickers. ...

Let's be honest, if you're on there for anything, it's for your religion.

 

[flacaltenn]

Ah, but see, the BLM protests were labeled as terrorism by some.

Yeah because they tagged some of that stuff before they burnt it, looted it, or tore it down.

Dont think Sunni Man is going around lighting up gas stations yet. BUT --- you know those Muslms

,,,,,,, a BIGOT would say..

Also noticed in TN and Alabama -- those stickers are pretty much there for the duration. Most of them been there for months.


When "normal people" get activated, they use satire, proper targeting of where they protest, and some restraints that they wont cross. It's a difference you should note. And I LOVE the "I did that" stickers. And REALLY love the BETTER version of it. SunniMan missed out on the better one.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Yeah because they tagged some of that stuff before they burnt it, looted it, or tore it down.

Dont think Sunni Man is going around lighting up gas stations yet. BUT --- you know those Muslms

,,,,,,, a BIGOT would say..

Also noticed in TN and Alabama -- those stickers are pretty much there for the duration. Most of them been there for months.


When "normal people" get activated, they use satire, proper targeting of where they protest, and some restraints that they wont cross. It's a difference you should note. And I LOVE the "I did that" stickers. And REALLY love the BETTER version of it. SunniMan missed out on the better one.

So I think what you're saying is that to call these stickers 'terrorism' is petty, simplistic, and just plain ridiculous and would probably say more about the person making the accusation than the target thereof. That about right?

 

[flacaltenn]

So I think what you're saying is that to call these stickers 'terrorism' is petty, simplistic, and just plain ridiculous and would probably say more about the person making the accusation than the target thereof. That about right?

I think you INVENTED that comparison -- yes? I gave you my opinion on why there's NO comparison between comedic protest stickers and looting, burning, MAJOR destruction, with no list of grievances.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I think you INVENTED that comparison -- yes? I gave you my opinion on why there's NO comparison between comedic protest stickers and looting, burning, MAJOR destruction, with no list of grievances.

Okay, but I'm not the one who brought up all the BLM stuff.

 

[eagle1462010]

Terrorism ......Yup. Anyone who compares the stickers to that has an elevator stuck in the basement.

 

[eagle1462010]

Federal Onshore and Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing Pause and Review - Harvard Law School

This page tracks the federal oil and gas leasing pause and related litigation. For more on these leasing programs, see our Onshore Leasing Page and Offshore Leasing Page. If you’re a reporter and would like to speak with an expert on this rule, please email us. Quick Take The IRA makes it hard...

eelp.law.harvard.edu

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION​

Read More
Jan. 20, 2021 DOI issues Secretarial Order No. 3395, announcing that the agency is temporarily suspending its authority to issue any onshore or offshore fossil fuel authorizations, including new lease sales, for 60 days.
Jan. 20, 2021 In Executive Order 13990, President Biden revokes the Trump Executive Order 13783 titled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth.” EO 13783 directed federal agencies to streamline the oil and gas leasing process and suspend, revise, or rescind regulations that burdened the development of domestic energy resources.
Jan. 27, 2021 President Biden signs Executive Order 14008, which pauses all new federal offshore and onshore oil and gas leasing pending a comprehensive review of the leasing and permitting program. The order also revokes Trump’s EO 13795.
March 15, 2021 The Biden administration asks the Ninth Circuit to dismiss the case reviewing President Obama’s withdrawing certain Arctic and Atlantic coastal areas from oil and gas leasing in light of President Biden revoking President Trump’s EO 13795 (the EO challenged in this case). The Biden administration asks the court to vacate the lower court ruling and remand with instructions to dismiss the case. League of Conservation Voters v. Trump, No. 19-35460 (9th Cir.).
March 24, 2021 Louisiana and twelve other states file a lawsuit challenging President Biden’s pause on new federal oil and gas lease sales arguing that the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and the current 5-year Leasing Program prohibit the moratorium. Louisiana v. Biden, Docket No. 2:21-CV-00778 (W.D. La.).
April 13, 2021 The Ninth Circuit dismisses the appeal of the March 29, 2019 decision by a federal judge to reinstate President Obama’s withdrawals of Arctic and Atlantic areas from oil and gas leasing because President Biden’s Executive Order 13990 revoking Trump’s EO 13795 rendered the appeal moot. League of Conservation Voters v. Trump, No. 19-35460 (9th Cir.).
June 15, 2021 A federal judge in the Western District of Louisiana issues a preliminary injunction blocking President Biden’s pause on oil and gas lease sales. The court holds that the leasing moratorium violates statutory authority given to DOI, the Bureau of Land Management, and BOEM under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and the current 5-year leasing program. The judge further holds that the immediate impact of the pause renders the preliminary injunction an appropriate remedy and that the DOI may not continue to pause upcoming Lease Sales 257 or 258. Louisiana v. Biden, Docket No. 2:21-CV-00778 (W.D. La.).
Aug. 9, 2021 Plaintiff states file a motion asking the court to order Lease Sale 257 and asking the federal government to show why its failure to make the sale does not put it in contempt of the preliminary injunction. Louisiana v. Biden, Docket No. 2:21-CV-00778 (W.D. La.).
Aug. 16, 2021 The Biden administration appeals the preliminary injunction that blocked the moratorium on new federal oil and gas leasing. Louisiana v. Biden, Docket No. 2:21-CV-00778 (W.D. La.).
Aug. 24, 2021 DOI announces that it will continue to prepare lease sales during the appeal process.
Aug. 24, 2021 The Department of Justice (DOJ) files a memorandum in response to the plaintiff states’ August 9 motion. DOJ argues that DOI had restarted the leasing program and was therefore complying with the preliminary injunction. DOJ further argues that the preliminary injunction did not require the Lease Sale to occur on any timeline, and the government was therefore entitled to complete a new environmental review. Louisiana v. Biden, Docket No. 2:21-CV-00778 (W.D. La.).
Aug. 31, 2021 Environmental groups file a lawsuit challenging DOI’s decision to hold Lease Sale 257 in the Gulf of Mexico, seeking vacatur and injunction of the sale. The groups argue that the sale of Lease 257 violates the NEPA and the APA and estimate that the sale “will result in the production of up to 1.12 billion barrels and 4.4 trillion cubic feet of fossil fuels over the next 50 years.” Friends of the Earth, et al. v. Haaland, et al., Docket No. 1:21-cv-02317 (D.D.C.).
Sept. 17, 2021 Plaintiff states withdraw their motion to compel Lease Sale 257. Louisiana v. Biden, Docket No. 2:21-CV-00778 (W.D. La.).
Oct. 4, 2021 BOEM publishes a notice in the federal register that it will open and publicly announce bids received for oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico Outercontinental Gas Lease Sale 257 on Nov. 17, 2021.
Oct. 29, 2021 BOEM publishes a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for Lease Sale 258, which would offer leasing for oil and gas in Cook Inlet in the Gulf of Alaska. BOEM also announces a 45-day public comment period on the DEIS.
Nov. 17, 2021 BOEM holds its largest sale ever, the Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale 257 for 308 tracts, covering 1.07 million acres of federal waters in the Gulf. In approving the sale, the DOI claimed it was acting “consistent with a U.S. District Court’s preliminary injunction.” However, environmental groups argue that this sale was not required by the June 15 preliminary injunction. These groups contend that by not conducting a new environmental review like the DOJ memo suggested was allowed, the federal government sped up the lease sale and worked against its decarbonization goals.
Nov. 26, 2021 DOI issues a report reviewing the federal oil and gas leasing process and making recommendations for reform. The report finds, among other things, that the current system does not give taxpayers fair returns and does not fully account for environmental harm, and that the current system encourages speculation by and decreases competition among oil companies. The report outlines recommendations to fix these problems and concludes that DOI is deciding how it will act on these recommendations and encourages Congress to pass reforms to the oil and gas leasing process.
Dec. 3, 2021 Democratic members of the House Committee on Natural Resources file an amicus brief in support of environmental groups challenging the Gulf of Mexico lease sale, arguing that the administration’s environmental review “substantially underestimates” the environmental harms of the lease sale. The brief also argues that the nationwide injunction issued by the District Court for the Western District of Louisiana “in no way excused” DOI’s obligations under NEPA and the APA. Friends of the Earth, et al., v. Haaland, et al., No. 21-cv-02317-RC (D.D.C.).
Jan. 19, 2022 Over 360 environmental groups sent a legal petition to the Biden administration to reduce oil and gas drilling to 98% lower than current levels by 2035. The petition explains that, without action, it will be difficult for the United States to keep its pledge to keep global temperatures from rising beyond 1.5℃.
Jan. 20, 2022 Over 80 environmental organizations sign and send a letter to the Biden administration, which urges the Department of the Interior to write a new 5-year Offshore Lease Program that bans lease sales starting in 2022. The letter also calls on Secretary Haaland to repudiate Lease Sale 257.
Jan. 27, 2022 The District Court for the District of Columbia blocks Lease Sale 257 in the Gulf of Mexico because the Department of the Interior failed to take a “hard look” at the environmental impact of the project or to account for the effect of overseas fossil fuel use when calculating climate impacts, which violated the National Environmental Policy Act. Friends of the Earth, et al., v. Haaland, et al., No. 21-cv-02317-RC (D.D.C.). For more background on the ruling, see EELP’s overview of the NEPA Review Process or visit our NEPA Tracker Page for the most up to date review requirements.
Feb. 1, 2022 The Department of the Interior mistakenly posted language on its oil and gas webpage that indicated royalty fees for leases would increase to 18.75%. The Department later removed the language, and a spokesperson for the Department said the decision to increase royalty rates was not yet final.
Feb. 8, 2022 Intervenor defendant, the American Petroleum Institute files a notice of appeal with the D.C. Circuit, challenging the D.C District Court’s decision to block Lease Sale 257 in the Gulf of Mexico. Friends of the Earth, et al. v. Haaland, et al., Docket No. 1:21-cv-02317 (D.D.C.).
Feb. 14, 2022 Louisiana, another intervenor defendant, files a notice of appeal in the D.C. Circuit case that blocked Lease Sale 257. Friends of the Earth, et al. v. Haaland, et al., Docket No. 22-05037 (D.C. Cir).
Feb. 14, 2022 The Biden administration asks the 5th Circuit to reverse the Western District of Louisiana’s decision that blocked the Biden administration’s moratorium on new oil and gas drilling on federal lands and waters. Among other issues, the Biden administration argues that Biden’s Executive Order 14008 is both lawful and unreviewable and that the plaintiffs relied on erroneous interpretations of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and the Mineral Leasing Act. Louisiana v. Biden, Docket No. 21-30505 (5th Cir.)
Feb. 18, 2022 Environmental groups file a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction in the D.C. Circuit case that blocked Lease Sale 257. Friends of the Earth, et al. v. Haaland, et al., Docket No. 22-05037 (D.C. Cir).
Feb. 22, 2022 A federal judge in the Western District of Louisiana blocks the Biden administration’s application of an interim social cost of carbon metric., Louisiana v. Biden, No. 21-cv-01074 (W.D. La.). For updates on the metric and this litigation, see our Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases tracker page. In light of this decision, the Biden administration announces that it will delay decisions on new oil and gas drilling on federal lands.
Feb. 28, 2022 The Biden administration announces that it will not appeal the District Court’s decision that canceled Lease Sale 257 in the Gulf of Mexico. Friends of the Earth, et al. v. Haaland, et al., Docket No. 1:21-cv-02317 (D.D.C.).
Mar. 8, 2022 The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denies an emergency motion by American Petroleum Institute to expedite the appeal of the District Court decision that canceled Lease Sale 257. Friends of the Earth, et al. v. Haaland, et al., Docket No. 22-05037 (D.C. Cir).