Olde Europe
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2014
- 6,025
- 4,523
- 2,065
Back to the instant case, this school district, and others nationwide, cannot ignore the crisis of gun violence in schools and are literally the battlefield for it. So they necessarily come up with policies, which again will vary in cultural values between different parties, including in this case the OP and his son's school. Politicians didn't create that policy --- the school did. It has a direct and intimate investment in its own welfare which given the stark consequences of failing to do that can and does result in hypervigilance. What they come up with may be reasonable or extreme but it's THEIR environment and it's up to them to control it day-to-day. The fact that politician A over here may support that policy while politician B over there opposes it, simply does not make them the originators of that policy. It makes them followers of what they think is the appropriate social trend for them.
This is the same thing I've been preaching the entire time I've been on this site about gun violence in general, the hot issue when I joined USMB, that it's not a question of throwing laws at it but rather a question of cultural values. And I mention that because you personally, I recall, were one of the few who took the effort to understood what I was saying.
So that's why this is not a political issue. Politicians don't start these 'camps'. They may, and they surely do, jump into those camps and in so doing deepen the divide for no good purpose, but make no mistake, they didn't create those camps. WE did. So this idea that goes around that believes "we have a problem and therefore politicians have to fix it" (which then means "my" politicians have to overcome "your" politicians to do so), just sounds like a giant cop-out. That's a giant dead end.
There certainly is a lot of valid thought in the above, and "cultural values" do play a role in all of it. Still, I think you are talking past each other mainly because you are using a narrower definition of "political" than usual, meaning, it's political if politicians are involved in leading roles. I'd say, whenever a group of people gets together to haggle over how not just to deal with themselves, but how a broader circle of people ought to live together, how behavior should be regulated (in a school district, town, State, or the nation), it is already political, no matter professional politicians' involvement, or none. In addition to that, it should also be clear that politics does have an influence on cultural values, as the surge in gun nuttery during the last decades demonstrates.
Moreover, the safety of schools has long escaped your narrower definition, when the schools were declared gun-free zones, and the NRA tried to get that revoked. There is a surprising number of political and professional organizations involved with how guns / violence / counseling etc. and schools should be regulated / improved, including paying attention to first signs indicating a possible later resort to violence. See here, and here, and here, and here, for instance.